ABSTRACT
The TEI-community is based a various paradigms. We believe that the community matures by scrutinising these different paradigms and unravelling the consequences for designing for tangible, embedded and embodied interaction. In this paper we explore the consequences and possibilities of phenomenology-inspired embodied theory, and more specifically the concept of embodied sensemaking, i.e. human sensemaking using sensorimotor couplings to support social coordination between people. Based on our theoretical setting, we introduce seven design principles for developing face-to-face embodied sensemaking technology. We show in this paper how we used these principles to develop a mobile design and sensemaking studio for the encounter between two persons to sketch a future at the cross-section of their disciplines. By explaining these principles, we aim to show what embodied theory can bring the TEI-community, and invite others to do the same.
Supplemental Material
- Beer, R.D. (2008). Dynamical systems and embedded cognition. In: K. Frankish and W. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
- Capra, F. (2002). The Hidden Connections. A Science for Sustainable Living. Harper Collins, London.Google Scholar
- Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition : On human knowledge and computer representation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Google ScholarDigital Library
- De Jaegher, H. and Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485507.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Dreyfus, H. (1996). The Current Relevance of MerleauPonty's Phenomenology of Embodiment. In Haber and Weiss (eds), Perspectives on Embodiment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Dreyfus, H.L. (2002). Intelligence without representation: Merleau-ponty's critique of mental representation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 367--83Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dreyfus, H. Wrathall, M., Kelly, S., Carman, T., Haugeland, J., Thomson, I., Taylor, C. and Borgmann, A. (2010). Being in the world. In a film by Tao Ruspoli. Mangusta Productions.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J.J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. London: Lawrence Erlbaum (reprinted in 1986).Google Scholar
- Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialects of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4 (2), 123--143.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gombrich, E.H. (1966). Leonardo's method for working out compositions. Norm and form: studies in the art of the Renaissance. Oxford: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
- Goodwin (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of pragmatics, 32, 1489--1522.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goodwin, C. (2003). The semiotic body in its environment. In: Coupland & Gwyn (Eds.), Discourses of the Body, 19--42. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Hornecker, E. and Buur, J. (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. Proc. of Human Factors in Comput. Sys. '06, Apr. 22--27, 437--446, New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hornecker, E., Jacob, R., Hummels, C., Ullmer, B., Schmidt, A., Hoven, van den E. and Mazalek, A. (2008). TEI Goes On: Tangible and Embedded Interaction. In: D. Hong (Ed.). IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7 (2), 91--96Google Scholar
- Hummels, C.C.M (2004). Educating interaction, experience and diversity. In: The changing face of design education; Proceedings of the 2nd IEPDE Conference (Delft, NL, September 2--3), 247--254.Google Scholar
- Ingold, T. (2008). When Ant Meets Spider. Social theory for arthropods. In: C. Knappett, L. Malafouris (eds.), Material Agency, 209--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ishii, H. (2008). Tangible bits: beyond pixels. In Proceedings of the 2nd int. TEI Conference (Bonn, Germany, February 18 20). New York: ACM, xv-xxv. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ishii, H., Lakatos, D., Bonanni, L. and Labrune, J.B. (2012) Radical Atoms: Beyond tangible bits, toward transformable materials. Interactions 19(1). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jaasma, Ph., Trotto, A. and Hummels, C. (2014). Irresistible brushes or open stickies? Bodystorming vs. Brainstorming. In: Proceedings of DRS'14 (Umeå, Sweden, June 15--19).Google Scholar
- Klemmer, S.R., Hartman, B. and Takayama, L. (2008) How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. Proceedings of the 2nd int. TEI Conference (Bonn, Germany, February 18 20). ACM, New York.Google Scholar
- Lave, J., (1988). Cognition in Practice. Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthews, E. (2006). Merleau Ponty. A guide for the perplexed, Continuum: London, UK.Google Scholar
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
- Sennett, R. (2012). Together. The rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. London: Penguin GroupGoogle Scholar
- Solomon, C., Banerjee, A., Horn, M. (2014). Ultimate trainer: instructional feedback for ultimate frisbee players. Proc TEI 2014. ACM, New York, 137--140. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steffensen, S.V. (2012). Care and conversing in dialogical systems. In: Language Sciences, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.langsci.2012.03.008Google ScholarCross Ref
- Suchman, L.A. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions 2nd expanded edition. New York and Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Theraulaz & Bonabeau (1999). A brief history of stigmergy. Artificial Life, 5, 97--116. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trotto (2011). Rights through Making. Doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Trotto, A., Hummels, C. and Levy, P. (2012). Developing a Kansei design approach to cater for ethics. In: Proceedings of KEER 2012 Conference (Penghu, Taiwan, May 22-25).Google Scholar
- Trotto, A. & Hummels, C.C.M. (2013). Engage me, do! Engagement Catalysers to ignite a (design) conversation. In: Proc. of DPPI '13. (Newcastle, September 3--5), 136--145. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Van Dijk, J. (2013). Creating traces, sharing insight: explorations in embodied cognition design. Doctoral dissertation. Eindhoven University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Van Dijk, J., Mousette, C., Kuenen, C.D. & Hummels, C.C.M. (2013). Radical Clashes: What Tangible Interaction is Made of. In Proceedings of the 7th Int. TEI'13 Conference. New York, USA: ACM, 323--326. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Van Dijk, J., Van der Lugt, R. and Hummels, C. (2014a). Beyond distributed representation: embodied cognition design supporting socio-sensorimotor couplings. In: Proceedings of the 8th Int. TEI'14 Conference. New York, USA: ACM, 181--188 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Van Dijk, J. & Mitchell, R. (2014b) Co-Embodied Technology: A Design space for Human Being. TEI'14 WIP poster.Vygotsky, L. S. (1956). Thought and Language. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Seven Principles to Design for Embodied Sensemaking
Recommendations
Designing for Embodied Being-in-the-World: Two Cases, Seven Principles and One Framework
TEI '17: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied InteractionHow may we design coherent, physical-digital hybrid artifacts as meaningful, mediating elements in a persons' embodied "Being-in-the-World" We explore this question through two cases, one of designing for a person with autism spectrum disorder and one ...
Embodied Encounters Studio: A Tangible Platform for Sensemaking
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis papers shows the Embodied Encounters Studio (EES) which facilitates live encounters between 2-4 persons while stimulating them to have a hands-on discussion, and which facilitates also the recording of the encounters, thus collecting data for ...
Researching the body and movement through artistic performative installations for collaborative digital sensemaking
KUI '23: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Culture and Computer Science: Code and MaterialityWhen tackling digital transformation, Digital Sensemaking, as researched in the DIGI-Sense project, empowers humans to reflect on the meaning from an intertwined cognitive, aesthetic, and body perspective. Sensemaking is fundamental for meaningful (work) ...
Comments