skip to main content
10.1145/2677199.2680577acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Seven Principles to Design for Embodied Sensemaking

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 January 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The TEI-community is based a various paradigms. We believe that the community matures by scrutinising these different paradigms and unravelling the consequences for designing for tangible, embedded and embodied interaction. In this paper we explore the consequences and possibilities of phenomenology-inspired embodied theory, and more specifically the concept of embodied sensemaking, i.e. human sensemaking using sensorimotor couplings to support social coordination between people. Based on our theoretical setting, we introduce seven design principles for developing face-to-face embodied sensemaking technology. We show in this paper how we used these principles to develop a mobile design and sensemaking studio for the encounter between two persons to sketch a future at the cross-section of their disciplines. By explaining these principles, we aim to show what embodied theory can bring the TEI-community, and invite others to do the same.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p21.mp4

mp4

274.4 MB

References

  1. Beer, R.D. (2008). Dynamical systems and embedded cognition. In: K. Frankish and W. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Capra, F. (2002). The Hidden Connections. A Science for Sustainable Living. Harper Collins, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition : On human knowledge and computer representation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. De Jaegher, H. and Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dreyfus, H. (1996). The Current Relevance of MerleauPonty's Phenomenology of Embodiment. In Haber and Weiss (eds), Perspectives on Embodiment. London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dreyfus, H.L. (2002). Intelligence without representation: Merleau-ponty's critique of mental representation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 367--83Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dreyfus, H. Wrathall, M., Kelly, S., Carman, T., Haugeland, J., Thomson, I., Taylor, C. and Borgmann, A. (2010). Being in the world. In a film by Tao Ruspoli. Mangusta Productions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibson, J.J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. London: Lawrence Erlbaum (reprinted in 1986).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialects of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4 (2), 123--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gombrich, E.H. (1966). Leonardo's method for working out compositions. Norm and form: studies in the art of the Renaissance. Oxford: Phaidon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodwin (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of pragmatics, 32, 1489--1522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Goodwin, C. (2003). The semiotic body in its environment. In: Coupland & Gwyn (Eds.), Discourses of the Body, 19--42. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hornecker, E. and Buur, J. (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. Proc. of Human Factors in Comput. Sys. '06, Apr. 22--27, 437--446, New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hornecker, E., Jacob, R., Hummels, C., Ullmer, B., Schmidt, A., Hoven, van den E. and Mazalek, A. (2008). TEI Goes On: Tangible and Embedded Interaction. In: D. Hong (Ed.). IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7 (2), 91--96Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hummels, C.C.M (2004). Educating interaction, experience and diversity. In: The changing face of design education; Proceedings of the 2nd IEPDE Conference (Delft, NL, September 2--3), 247--254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ingold, T. (2008). When Ant Meets Spider. Social theory for arthropods. In: C. Knappett, L. Malafouris (eds.), Material Agency, 209--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ishii, H. (2008). Tangible bits: beyond pixels. In Proceedings of the 2nd int. TEI Conference (Bonn, Germany, February 18 20). New York: ACM, xv-xxv. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ishii, H., Lakatos, D., Bonanni, L. and Labrune, J.B. (2012) Radical Atoms: Beyond tangible bits, toward transformable materials. Interactions 19(1). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jaasma, Ph., Trotto, A. and Hummels, C. (2014). Irresistible brushes or open stickies? Bodystorming vs. Brainstorming. In: Proceedings of DRS'14 (Umeå, Sweden, June 15--19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Klemmer, S.R., Hartman, B. and Takayama, L. (2008) How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. Proceedings of the 2nd int. TEI Conference (Bonn, Germany, February 18 20). ACM, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lave, J., (1988). Cognition in Practice. Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Matthews, E. (2006). Merleau Ponty. A guide for the perplexed, Continuum: London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith. New York: Humanities Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sennett, R. (2012). Together. The rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. London: Penguin GroupGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Solomon, C., Banerjee, A., Horn, M. (2014). Ultimate trainer: instructional feedback for ultimate frisbee players. Proc TEI 2014. ACM, New York, 137--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Steffensen, S.V. (2012). Care and conversing in dialogical systems. In: Language Sciences, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.langsci.2012.03.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Suchman, L.A. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions 2nd expanded edition. New York and Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Theraulaz & Bonabeau (1999). A brief history of stigmergy. Artificial Life, 5, 97--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Trotto (2011). Rights through Making. Doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Trotto, A., Hummels, C. and Levy, P. (2012). Developing a Kansei design approach to cater for ethics. In: Proceedings of KEER 2012 Conference (Penghu, Taiwan, May 22-25).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Trotto, A. & Hummels, C.C.M. (2013). Engage me, do! Engagement Catalysers to ignite a (design) conversation. In: Proc. of DPPI '13. (Newcastle, September 3--5), 136--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Van Dijk, J. (2013). Creating traces, sharing insight: explorations in embodied cognition design. Doctoral dissertation. Eindhoven University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Dijk, J., Mousette, C., Kuenen, C.D. & Hummels, C.C.M. (2013). Radical Clashes: What Tangible Interaction is Made of. In Proceedings of the 7th Int. TEI'13 Conference. New York, USA: ACM, 323--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Van Dijk, J., Van der Lugt, R. and Hummels, C. (2014a). Beyond distributed representation: embodied cognition design supporting socio-sensorimotor couplings. In: Proceedings of the 8th Int. TEI'14 Conference. New York, USA: ACM, 181--188 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Van Dijk, J. & Mitchell, R. (2014b) Co-Embodied Technology: A Design space for Human Being. TEI'14 WIP poster.Vygotsky, L. S. (1956). Thought and Language. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Seven Principles to Design for Embodied Sensemaking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '15: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      January 2015
      766 pages
      ISBN:9781450333054
      DOI:10.1145/2677199

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 January 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate63of222submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader