skip to main content
10.1145/2677199.2680547acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Scotty: Relocating Physical Objects Across Distances Using Destructive Scanning, Encryption, and 3D Printing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 January 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a simple self-contained appliance that allows relocating inanimate physical objects across distance. Each unit consists of an off-the-shelf 3D printer that we have extended with a 3-axis milling machine, a camera, and a micro-controller for encryption/decryption and transmission. Users place an object into the sender unit, enter the address of a receiver unit, and press the relocate button. The sender unit now digitizes the original object layer-by-layer: it shaves off material using the built-in milling machine, takes a photo using the built-in camera, encrypts the layer using the public key of the receiver, and transmits it. The receiving unit decrypts the layer in real-time and starts printing right away. Users thus see the object appear layer-by-layer on the receiver side as it disappears layer-by-layer at the sender side. Scotty is different from previous systems that copy physical objects, as its destruction and encryption mechanism guarantees that only one copy of the object exists at a time. Even though our current prototype is limited to single-material plastic objects, it allows us to address two application scenarios: (1) Scotty can help preserve the uniqueness and thus the emotional value of physical objects shared between friends. (2) Scotty can address some of the licensing issues involved in fast electronic delivery of physical goods. We explore the former in an exploratory user study with three pairs of participants.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

tei105.mp4

mp4

42.2 MB

References

  1. AluCarriage: http://shop.raffle.ch/shop/alucarriage-dual/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Belk, R. W. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, '88, 139--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamin, W. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 1936.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. CGI, www.cgiinspection.com/Pearl700.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Y., Li, K., Qian, X. Direct Geometry Processing For Tele-Fabrication. Proc. ASME '12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, Y.H., Ng, C.T. Integrated reverse engineering and rapid prototyping. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 3--4, '97, 481--484,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Domiter, V., Zalik, B. Sweep-line algorithm for constrained Delaunay triangulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science '08, Vol. 22, No. 4, 449--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Galantucci, L.M., Percoco, G., Spina, R. Telemanufacturing of reverse engineered parts: A case study. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 217 No. 5, '03, 727--731.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gershenfeld, N. Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop From Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. Basic Books, '07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hood, B.M., Bloom, P. Children prefer certain individuals over perfect duplicates. Cognition '08, Vol. 106, 455--462.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hood, B.M., Gjersoe, N. L., Bloom, P. Do children think that duplicating the body also duplicates the mind? Cognition, Volume 125, Issue 3, '12, 466--474.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jung, E.K.Y. et al. Manufacturing control system. U.S. Patent 8286236, filed January 31, '08, issued September 10, '12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lan, H. A re-configurable cross-sectional imaging system for reverse engineering based on a CNC milling machine. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 37 (3--4), '08, 341--353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, W.C., Chen, L.W. Design and fabrication of a general purpose 3D digitizer based on grinding technique. Materials Science Forum, Vol. 594, '08, 714.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Libsodium Encryption Library, https://github.com/jedisct1/libsodiumGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, Z., Wang, L., Lu, B. Integrating cross-sectional imaging based reverse engineering with rapid prototyping. Computers in Industry 57 (2), '06, 131--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Luo, R.C., Lee, W.Z., Chou, J.H., Leong, H.T. The development of Internet accessible rapid prototyping system. Proc. IECON '99, 1498--1503.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mueller, S., Mohr, T., Guenther, K., Frohnhofen, J., Baudisch, P. faBrickation: Fast 3D Printing of Functioning Objects by Integrating Construction Kit Building Blocks. Proc. CHI'14, 3827--3834. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Newman, G.E., Bloom, P. Art and Authenticity: The Importance of Originals in Judgements of Value. Journal of Experimental Psychology '11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Odom, W., Pierce, J., Stolterman, E., Blevis, E. Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. Proc. CHI'09, 1053--1062. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Paul, C. Fluid Borders: The Aesthetic Evolution of Digital Sculpture. International Sculpture Center, Web Special. http://www.sculpture.org/documents/webspec/ digscul/digscul6.shtmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Reyes, R. World's First 3D Fax Machine. '91. https://webspace.utexas.edu/reyesr/self/3D_fax.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Savage, V., Chang, C., Hartmann, B. Sauron: embedded single-camera sensing of printed physical user interfaces. Proc. UIST'13, 447--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sharpe, N. F., Arewa, O.B. Is Apple Playing Fair? Navigating the iPod FairPlay DRM Controversy. Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 5.2, '07, 331--349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Stratasys, 3D printer: Objet500 Connex3, http://www.stratasys.com/Objet500Connex3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Vidimce, K., Wang, S.-P., Ragan-Kelley, J., Matusik, W. OpenFab: A Programmable Pipeline for MultiMaterial Fabrication. ACM Trans. Graph 32 (4), '13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. ZMQ4 TCP library, https://github.com/pebbe/zmq4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Zoran, A., Buechley, L. Hybrid reAssemblage: An Exploration of Craft, Digital Fabrication and Artifact Uniqueness. Leonardo Journal '13, Vol. 46, No. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Scotty: Relocating Physical Objects Across Distances Using Destructive Scanning, Encryption, and 3D Printing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '15: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      January 2015
      766 pages
      ISBN:9781450333054
      DOI:10.1145/2677199

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 January 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate63of222submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader