skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675290acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

The Diffusion of Support in an Online Social Movement: Evidence from the Adoption of Equal-Sign Profile Pictures

Published:28 February 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In March of 2013, 3 million Facebook users changed their profile picture to one of an equals sign to express support of same-sex marriage. We demonstrate that this action shows complex diffusion characteristics congruent with threshold models, with most users observing several of their friends changing their profile picture before taking the action themselves. While the number of friends played a role in the adoption dynamics, so did demographic characteristics and the general propensity of the individual to change their profile picture. We show via simulation that the adoption curve is consistent with a heterogeneous-threshold model, in which the probability of adoption depends on both the number of friends and the susceptibility of the individual.

References

  1. Aral, S., Muchnik, L., and Sundararajan, A. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 51 (2009), 21544--21549.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., and Lan, X. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In Proc. KDD'06, ACM (2006), 44--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., and Adamic, L. The role of social networks in information diffusion. In Proc. WWW'12, ACM (2012), 519--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., and Fowler, J. H. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489, 7415 (2012), 295--298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Centola, D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329, 5996 (2010), 1194--1197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Centola, D. An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science 334, 6060 (2011), 1269--1272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Centola, D., and Macy, M. Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology 113, 3 (2007), 702--734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cohen, J. Gay marriage support hits new high in post-abc poll. Washington Post, 18 March 2013. Available: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/03/18/gaymarriage-support-hits-new-high-in-post-abc-poll/ {Last accessed: 22 February 2014}, March 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Conover, M. D., Davis, C., Ferrara, E., McKelvey, K., Menczer, F., and Flammini, A. The geospatial characteristics of a social movement communication network. PloS one 8, 3 (2013), e55957.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Conover, M. D., Ferrara, E., Menczer, F., and Flammini, A. The digital evolution of occupy wall street. PloS one 8, 5 (2013), e64679.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. De Domenico, M., Lima, A., Mougel, P., and Musolesi, M. The anatomy of a scientific rumor. Scientific reports 3 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. De Domenico, M., Lima, A., Mougel, P., and Musolesi, M. Role of committed minorities in times of crisis. Scientific reports 3, 1371 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dow, P. A., Adamic, L. A., and Friggeri, A. The Anatomy of Large Facebook Cascades. In Proc ICWSM'13 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Friggeri, A., Adamic, L. A., Eckles, D., and Cheng, J. Rumor Cascades. In Proc ICWSM'14 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. González-Bailín, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., and Moreno, Y. The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Scientific reports 1 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gould, R. V. Multiple networks and mobilization in the paris commune, 1871. American Sociological Review (1991), 716--729.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Granovetter, M. Threshold models of collective behavior. American journal of sociology (1978), 1420--1443.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Herek, G. M., and Glunt, E. K. Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey. The Journal of Sex Research 30, 3 (August 1993), 239--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. ImageMagick Studio, L. Imagemagick (version 6.8.7-2) {computer software}, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Merton, R. K., et al. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and control in modern society 18, 1 (1954), 18--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Leskovec, J., Adamic, L. A., and Huberman, B. A. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB) 1, 1 (2007), 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Liaw, A., and Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomforest. R News 2, 3 (2002), 18--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I., and Boyd, D. The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 tunisian and egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication 5 (2011), 1375--1405.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Macskassy, S. A., and Michelson, M. Why do people retweet? anti-homophily wins the day! In Proc. ICWSM'11 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. McAdam, D. Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology (1986), 64--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American journal of sociology (1977), 1212--1241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mejova, Y., and Weber, I. Quantifying politics using online data: Introduction. Social Science Computer Review (2013), 0894439313506848. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Olson, L. R., Cadge, W., and Harrison, J. T. Religion and public opinion about same-sex marriage*. Social Science Quarterly 87, 2 (2006), 340--360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Olson, M. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Rao, H., Greve, H. R., and Davis, G. F. Fool's gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by wall street analysts. Administrative Science Quarterly 46, 3 (2001), 502--526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Romero, D. M., Meeder, B., and Kleinberg, J. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter. In Proc. WWW'11, ACM (2011), 695--704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Shalizi, C. R., and Thomas, A. C. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods & Research 40, 2 (2011), 211--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Sherkat, D. E., Powell-Williams, M., Maddox, G., and De Vries, K. M. Religion, politics, and support for same-sex marriage in the united states, 1988--2008. Social Science Research 40, 1 (2011), 167--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Starbird, K., and Palen, L. (How) will the revolution be retweeted?: information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. In Proc. CSCSW'12 (2012), 7--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ver Steeg, G., Ghosh, R., and Lerman, K. What stops social epidemics? In Proc. ICWSM'11 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Weng, L., Menczer, F., and Ahn, Y.-Y. Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Scientific reports 3 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Diffusion of Support in an Online Social Movement: Evidence from the Adoption of Equal-Sign Profile Pictures

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
      February 2015
      1956 pages
      ISBN:9781450329224
      DOI:10.1145/2675133

      Copyright © 2015 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 February 2015

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate161of575submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader