Focused, Aroused, but so Distractible: Temporal Perspectives on Multitasking and Communications

ABSTRACT

A common assumption in studies of interruptions is that one is focused in an activity and then distracted by other stimuli. We take the reverse perspective and examine whether one might first be in an attentional state that makes one susceptible to communications typically associated with distraction. We explore the confluence of multitasking and workplace communications from three temporal perspectives -- prior to an interaction, when tasks and communications are interleaved, and at the end of the day. Using logging techniques and experience sampling, we observed 32 employees in situ for five days. We found that certain attentional states lead people to be more susceptible to particular types of interaction. Rote work is followed by more Facebook or face-to-face interaction. Focused and aroused states are followed by more email. The more time in email and face-fo-face interaction, and the more total screen switches, the less productive people feel at the day's end. We present the notion of emotional homeostasis along with new directions for multitasking research.

References

1. Adler, R.F. and Benbunan-Fich, R. Self-interruptions in discretionary multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29 (4). 1441--1449.
2. Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E. and Alstyne, M.W.V. Information Technology and Information Worker Productivity. Information Systems Research, 2011.
3. Barley, S., Meyerson, D. and Grodal, S. Email as a Source and Symbol of Stress. Organization Science, 2011, 22 (4). 887--906.
4. Buck, R. Social and emotional functions in facial expression and communication: The readout hypothesis. Biological Psychology, 1994, 38. 95--115.
5. Chrousos, G. and Gold, P. The concepts of stress and stress symptom disorders: Overview of physical and behavioral homeostatis. JAMA, 1992, 267 (9). 1244-
6. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E. and Wilhite, S., A diary study of task switching and interruptions. in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2004), 175--182.
7. Dabbish, L., Mark, G., #237, Gonz, c.M., #225 and lez. Why do i keep interrupting myself?: environment, habit and self-interruption Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011, 3127--3130.
8. Ean, L.C. Face-to-face Versus Computer-mediated Communicaton: Exploring Employee's Preference of Effective Employee Communication Channel. International Journal for the Advancement of Science and Arts, 2010, 1 (2). 38--47.
9. Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1957.
10. Gonzalez, V.M. and Mark, G., "Constant, Constant, Multi-tasking Craziness": Managing Multiple Working Spheres. in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (Vienna, Austria, 2004), 113--120.
11. Grandey, A.A., Tam, A.P. and Brauburger, A.L. Affective States and Traits in the Workplace: Diary and Survey Data from Young Workers. Motivation and Emotion, 2002, 26 (1). 31--55.
12. Heider, F. Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 1944, 51 (6). 358374.
13. Hektner, J., Schmidt, J. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007.
14. Herzberg, F. The Motivation to Work. Transaction Publishers, 1993.
15. Hodges, S., Williams, L., Berry, E., Izadi, S., Srinivasan, J., Butler, A., Smyth, G., Kapur, N. and Wood, K. SenseCam: A Retrospective Memory Aid Ubicomp, 2006, 177--193.
16. Iqbal, S.T. and Horvitz, E., Disruption and Recovery of Computing Tasks: Field Study, Analysis and Directions. in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (San Jose, California, USA, 2007), 677--686.
17. Jin, J. and Dabbish, L.A. Self-interruption on the computer: a typology of discretionary task interleaving Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Boston, MA, USA, 2009, 1799--1808.
18. Kohler, W. Dynamics in Psychology. Liverright, New York, 1942.
19. Lewin, K. Defining the "Field at a Given Time.". Psychological Review, 1943, 50. 292--310.
20. Mark, G., Gonzalez, V.M. and Harris, J. No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work in Proceeding of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems ACM Press, Portland, Oregon, USA 2005, 321--330
21. Mark, G., Hausstein, D. and Klocke, U. The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Florence, Italy, 2008, 107--110.
22. Mark, G., Iqbal, S.T., Czerwinski, M. and Johns, P. Bored mondays and focused afternoons: the rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2014, 3025--3034.
23. Mark, G., Iqbal, S.T., Czerwinski, M. and Johns, P. Capturing the Mood: Facebook and Face-to-Face Encounters in the Workplace ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2014, (to appear).
24. Mark, G., Wang, Y. and Niiya, M. Stress and multitasking in everyday college life: an empirical study of online activity Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2014, 4150.
25. Neuberg, S.L., Kenrick, D.T. and Schaller, M. Human Threat Management Systems: Self-Protection and Disease Avoidance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2011, 35. 1042--1051.
26. O'Conaill, B. and Frohlich, D., Timespace in the workplace: dealing with interruptions. in CHI, (1995), 262--263.
27. Posner, J., Russell, J.A. and Peterson, B.S. The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 2005, 17. 715--734.
28. Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Rom, V. and Bakker, A. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 2002, 3. 7192.
29. Watson, D., Clark, A.L. and Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 56 (6). 1063--1070.
30. Wood, W. and Neal, D.T. A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychological Review, 2007, 114 (4). 843--863.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

• Social and professional topics

  • Computing / technology policy