Understanding the Effects of Crowdfunding on Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy

ABSTRACT

Crowdfunding is emerging as a new socio-technical system that is changing how entrepreneurs interact with their community of financial supporters. While computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) researchers have begun to explore how this new type of system influences entrepreneurial work, less is understood about how the system influences their psychological experience - specifically self-efficacy, or belief in one's own ability to succeed at a task, which affects persistence, learning, and performance. Drawing on Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory, we conducted a qualitative study of 53 entrepreneurs using crowdfunding and found that crowdfunding can influence self-efficacy through (1) social validation, (2) role modeling, (3) mastery, and (4) physiological states supported by socio-technical features, such as displaying a concrete goal, examples of other's work, or public feedback. Results suggest how socio-technical systems can be designed to help entrepreneurs perform to enhance our economic and social prosperity.

References

1. Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., and Goldfarb, A. Offline Relationships, Distance, and the Internet: The Geography of Crowdfunding. National Bureau of Economic Research,, Cambridge, MA, 2011.
2. Alexa.com. 2011. http://www.alexa.com/.
3. Asch, S. Opinions and Social Pressure. Scientific American 193, 5 (1955), 31--35.
4. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company, 1997.
5. Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., and Schwienbacher, A. Crowdfunding: An Industrial Organization Perspective. Prepare for the workshop on Digital Business Models: Understanding Strategies, (2010).
6. Benkler, Y., Shaw, A., and Hill, B. M. Peer Production: A Modality of Collective Intelligence. In The Collective Intelligence Handbook. (in preparation).
7. Boyd, N. G. and Vozikis, G. S. The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18, (1994), 63--63.
8. Chen, C., Greene, P. G., and Crick, A. Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers. Journal of Business Venturing' 13, (1998), 295--316.
9. Dabbish, L., Stuart, C., Tsay, J., and Herbsleb, J. Social coding in GitHub: Transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. Proc. of CSCW, ACM (2012), 1277--1286.
10. Dow, S., Gerber, E., and Wong, A. A pilot study of using crowds in the classroom. Proc. of CHI, (2013), 227--236.
11. Gangadharbatla, H. Facebook me: Collective self-esteem, need to belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the iGeneration's attitudes toward social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising 8, 2 (2008), 5--15.
12. Gerber, E. M. and Hui, J. Crowdfunding: Motivations and Deterrents for Participation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 6 (2013), 34:1--34:32.
13. Gilbert, E. Designing social translucence over social networks. Proc. of CHI, (2012), 2731--2740.
14. Gist, M. E. Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review 12, 3 (1987), 472--485.
15. Greenberg, M. Learning to Fail: Experiencing Public Failure Online Through Crowdfunding. Proc. of CHI, (2014).
16. Grudin, J. and Poltrock, S. E. Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware. Advances in Computers 45, (1997), 269--320.
17. Hackman, J. R. and Oldham, G. R. Work redesign. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, 1980.
18. Hui, J., Gerber, E., and Gergle, D. Understanding and Leveraging Social Networks for Crowdfunding: Opportunities and Challenges. Proc. of DIS, (2014).
19. Hui, J. S., Greenberg, M. D., and Gerber, E. M. Understanding the Role of Community in Crowdfunding Work. Proc. of CSCW, (2014), 62--74.
20. IndieGoGo.com. 2011.
21. Kickstarter.com. 2013. http://www.kickstarter.com/.
22. Kittur, N., Nickerson, J., Bernstein, M., et al. The Fu-ture of Crowd Work. Proc. of CSCW, (2013), 1301--1318.
23. Kollock, P. The economies of online cooperation. Communities in cyberspace, (1999), 220.
24. Kraut, R. E. and Resnick, P. Building successful online communities. The MIT Press, 2012.
25. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 1991.
26. Liang, C.-Y., Chen, C.-H., and Hsu, Y.-L. The Participation Motivation and Work Styles of the Administrators for Chinese Wikipedia (Article written in Chinese). Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences 46, 1 (2008), 81--109.
27. Luther, K., Caine, K., Ziegler, K., and Bruckman, A. Why it works (when it works): success factors in online creative collaboration. Proc. of GROUP, ACM (2010), 1--10.
28. Marlow, J. and Dabbish, L. From rookie to all-star: professional development in a graphic design social networking site. Proc. of CSCW, ACM (2014), 922--933.
29. McMullen, J. S. and Shepherd, D. A. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review 31, 1 (2006), 132--152.
30. Mintzberg, H. An Emerging Strategy of "Direct" Research. Administrative Science Quarterly 24, (1979), 580--589.
31. Muller, M., Geyer, W., Soule, T., Daniels, S., and Cheng, L.-T. Crowdfunding inside the enterprise: employee-initiatives for innovation and collaboration. Proc. of CHI, (2013), 503--512.
32. Panovich, K., Miller, R., and Karger, D. Tie strength in question & answer on social network sites. Proc. of CSCW, ACM (2012), 1057--1066.
33. Rafaeli, S. and Ariel, Y. 11 Online Motivational Factors: Incentives for Participation and Contribution in Wikipedia. (2008).
34. Restivo, M. and van de Rijt, A. Experimental study of informal rewards in peer production. PloS one 7, 3 (2012), e34358.
35. Rosen, Y. and Rimor, R. Using a collaborative database to enhance students' knowledge construction. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 5, 1 (2009), 187--195.
36. Shane, S. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Northampton, MA, 2003.
37. Sharratt, M. and Usoro, A. Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice. Electronic Journal on Knowledge Management 1, 2 (2003), 187--196.
38. Shea, P. and Bidjerano, T. Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education 55, 4 (2010), 1721--1731.
39. Spradley, J. P. Participant Observation. Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1980.
40. Vygotsky, L. S. The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Plenum, New York, 1987.
41. Ward, C. and Ramachandran, V. Crowdfunding the next hit: Microfunding online experience goods. Proc. of NIPS, Workshop on Computational Social Science and the Wisdom of Crowds, (2010).
42. Warschauer, M. Computer-mediated collaborative learning: theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal 81, 4 (1997), 470--481.
43. Weick, K. E. Sensemaking in Organizations: Small Structures with Large Consequences. In Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research. Simon & Schuster, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993, 10--37.
44. Kickstarter Stats. Kickstarter. http://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats.
45. Wikipedia editor survey: Top-line data released - Wikimedia blog. http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/06/17/wikipedia-editor-survey-top-line-data-released/.
46. Cards Against Humanity.
47. Techstars. Techstars. http://www.techstars.com/.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

    • Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms

      • Computer supported cooperative work

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction paradigms

      • Web-based interaction

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing and business

      • Computer supported cooperative work