What is Tumblr: a statistical overview and comparison

Abstract

Tumblr, as one of the most popular microblogging platforms, has gained momentum recently. It is reported to have 166.4 millions of users and 73.4 billions of posts by January 2014. While many articles about Tumblr have been published in major press, there is not much scholar work so far. In this paper, we provide some pioneer analysis on Tumblr from a variety of aspects. We study the social network structure among Tumblr users, analyze its user generated content, and describe reblogging patterns to analyze its user behavior. We aim to provide a comprehensive statistical overview of Tumblr and compare it with other popular social services, including blogosphere, Twitter and Facebook, in answering a couple of key questions: What is Tumblr? How is Tumblr different from other social media networks? In short, we find Tumblr has more rich content than other microblogging platforms, and it contains hybrid characteristics of social networking, traditional blogosphere, and social media. This work serves as an early snapshot of Tumblr that later work can leverage.

References

1. N. Agarwal, H. Liu, L. Tang, and P. S. Yu. Identifying the influential bloggers in a community. In Proceedings of WSDM, 2008.
2. A. Anagnostopoulos, R. Kumar, and M. Mahdian. Influence and correlation in social networks. In Proceedings of KDD, 2008.
3. E. Bakshy, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts. Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In Proceedings of WSDM, 2011.
4. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan:. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:993--1022, 2003.
5. S. Chang, V. Kumar, E. Gilbert, and L. Terveen. Specialization, homophily, and gender in a social curation site: Findings from pinterest. In Proceedings of The 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW'14, 2014.
6. A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman. Power-law distributions in empirical data. arXiv, 706, 2007.
7. E. Gilbert, S. Bakhshi, S. Chang, and L. Terveen. 'i need to try this!': A statistical overview of pinterest. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2013.
8. N. Hochman and R. Schwartz. Visualizing instagram: Tracing cultural visual rhythms. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Social Media Visualization (SocMedVis) in conjunction with ICWSM, 2012.
9. J. E. Hopcroft, T. Lou, and J. Tang. Who will follow you back?: reciprocal relationship prediction. In Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), pages 1137--1146, 2011.
10. A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07, pages 56--65, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
11. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. B. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media. In Proceedings of 19th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 2010.
12. C. Lampe, N. Ellison, and C. Steinfield. A familiar face(book): Profile elements as signals in an online social network. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2007.
13. J. Leskovec and E. Horvitz. Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In WWW '08: Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 915--924, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
14. M. McGlohon, J. Leskovec, C. Faloutsos, M. Hurst, and N. S. Glance. Finding patterns in blog shapes and blog evolution. In Proceedings of ICWSM, 2007.
15. A. Mislove, M. Marcon, K. P. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In IMC '07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pages 29--42, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
16. S. Mittal, N. Gupta, P. Dewan, and P. Kumaraguru. The pinbang theory: Discovering the pinterest world. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.4952, 2013.
17. B. Nardi, D. J. Schiano, S. Gumbrecht, and L. Swartz. Why we blog. Commun. ACM, 47(12):41--46, 2004.
18. M. E. J. Newman. Assortative mixing in networks. Physical review letters, 89(20): 208701, 2002.
19. M. E. J. Newman. Mixing patterns in networks. Physical Review E, 67(2): 026126, 2003.
20. R. Ottoni, J. P. Pesce, D. Las Casas, G. Franciscani, P. Kumaruguru, and V. Almeida. Ladies first: Analyzing gender roles and behaviors in pinterest. Proceedings of ICWSM, 2013.
21. X. Shi, B. Tseng, , and L. A. Adamic. Looking at the blogosphere topology through different lenses. In Proceedings of ICWSM, 2007.
22. J. Ugander, B. Karrer, L. Backstrom, and C. Marlow. The anatomy of the facebook social graph. arXiv preprint arXiv:1111.4503, 2011.
23. J. Weng, E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He. Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In Proceedings of WSDM, pages 1137--1146, 2010.
24. S. Wu, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts. Who says what to whom on twitter. In Proceedings of WWW 2011.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction paradigms

      • Web-based interaction

• Information systems

  • Information retrieval

  • Information storage systems

  • Information systems applications

    • Data mining