skip to main content
10.1145/2669711.2669911acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A multimodal learning analytics view of HTML5 APIs: technical benefits and privacy risks

Published:01 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

During the last decade, students and teachers have been using a wide variety of web platforms to enhance education. Traditional forums, blogs, wikis, Learning Management Systems or social networks coexist with an astonishing volume of mobile learning apps. All of these platforms provide insightful logs of users' interactions. This is especially true when educational researchers take advantage of smartphones to gather and analyze learning processes in a multimodal manner (not only users' clicks or touch events, but also audio, video, location, motion, temperature, humidity or luminosity, among others). This paper describes the potential advantages of using HTML5 APIs to enhance education using web apps in mobile environments from a Multimodal Learning Analytics perspective, and discusses the privacy risks of this new scenario.

References

  1. P. Blikstein, 2013, April. "Multimodal learning analytics". In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 102--106). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Sharples, J. Taylor, and G. Vavoula. 2005. "Towards a theory of mobile learning". Proceedings of mLearn 2005 1 (1), 1--9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Swenson. 2014. "Establishing an ethical literacy for learning analytics". In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge (LAK '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 246--250. DOI=10.1145/2567574.2567613 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2567574.2567613 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K. Shilton. 2009. "Four billion little brothers?: privacy, mobile phones, and ubiquitous data collection". Commun. ACM 52, 11 (November 2009), 48--53. DOI=10.1145/1592761.1592778 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1592761.1592778 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Even-Levy. 2011. "HTML5 --- Opportunities for Mobile Devices". Retrieved 07-07, 2014, from http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/681/html5--opportunities-for-mobile-devicesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Aljohani Naif and H. C. Davis. 2012. "Learning analytics in mobile and ubiquitous learning environments". In, 11th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning: mLearn 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 16 - 18 Oct 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Popescu. 2013. "Geolocation API Specification". W3C Recommendation 24 October 2013. Retrieved 07-07, 2014, from http://www.w3.org/TR/geolocation-API/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Block, and A. Popescu. 2011. "DeviceOrientation Event Specification". W3C Working Draft 1 December 2011. Retrieved 07-07, 2014, from http://www.w3.org/TR/orientation-event/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Kostiainen and M. Lamouri. 2012. "Battery Status API". W3C Candidate Recommendation 08 May 2012. See http://www.w3.org/TR/battery-status/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Lamouri. 2014. "The Network Information API". W3C Working Group Note 10 April 2014. Retrieved 07-07, 2014, from http://www.w3.org/TR/netinfo-api/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Byers, F. Hirsch and D. Hazaël-Massieux. 2009. "Permissions for Device API Access". W3C Editor's Draft 30 September 2010. Retrieved from http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/api-perms/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. I. Hickson. 2013. "Web Storage". W3C Recommendation 30 July 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/webstorage/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Ranganathan and J. Sicking. 2013. "File API". W3C Last Call Working Draft 12 September 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. N. Mehta, J. Sicking, E. Graff, A. Popescu, J. Orlow and J. Bell. 2013. "Indexed Database API". W3C Candidate Recommendation 04 July 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Device APIs Working Group. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Turner and A. Kostiainen. 2014. "Ambient Light Events". W3C Last Call Working Draft 19 June 2014. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/ambient-light/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Cáceres and N. V. Balaji. 2014. "Ambient Temperature Events". Unofficial Draft 07 July 2014. Retrieved from: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/tip/temperature/Overview.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Cáceres and N. V. Balaji. 2014. "Ambient Humidity Events". Unofficial Draft 07 July 2014. Retrieved from: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/default/humidity/Overview.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D Tran. 2014. "Atmospheric Pressure Events". Unofficial Draft 07 July 2014. Retrieved from: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/default/pressure/Overview.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Kostiainen and D. Tran. 2014. "Proximity Events". W3C Editor's Draft 28 April 2014. Retrieved from: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/default/proximity/Overview.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Pietersand G. Adams. 2013. "CSSOM View Module". W3C Working Draft 17 December 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/cssom-view/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. D. Schepers, S. Moon, M. Brubeck, A. Barstow. 2013. "Touch Events". W3C Recommendation 10 October 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/touch-events/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. A. Kostiainen. 2014. "Vibration API". W3C Last Call Working Draft 19 June 2014. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/vibration/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. D. C. Burnett, A. Bergkvist, C. Jennings and A. Narayanan. 2014. "Media Capture and Streams". W3C Editor's Draft 04 July 2014. Retrieved from: http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/getusermedia.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. A. Bergkvist, D. C. Burnett, C. Jennings and A. Narayanan. 2013. "WebRTC 1.0: Real-time Communication Between Browsers". W3C Working Draft 10 September 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Pfeiffer, P. Jägenstedt and I. Hickson. 2014. "WebVTT: The Web Video Text Tracks Format". Draft Community Group Report 18 June 2014. Retrieved from: http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. D. Jackson, D. Hyatt, and C. Marrin. 2009. "CSS Animations Module Level 3", W3C Working Draft 20 March 2009. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-animations-20090320Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. P. Schmitz and A. Cohen. 2001. "SMIL Animation", W3C Recommendation 04-September-2001. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-smil-animation-20010904/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. Robinson and C. McCormack. 2012. "Timing control for script-based animations", W3C Working Draft 21 February 2012. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WDanimation-timing-20120221/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. E. Dahlström, P. Dengler, A. Grasso, C. Lilley, C. McCormack, D. Schepers, and J. Watt. 2011. "Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.1 (Second Edition)", W3C Recommendation 16 August 2011. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-SVG11-20110816/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. I. Hickson. 2012. "HTML Canvas 2D Context", W3C Working Draft 20 March 2012. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-2dcontext-20120320/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. C. Marrin. 2011."WebGL Specification, Version 1.0", 10 February 2011. Retrieved from https://www.khronos.org/registry/webgl/specs/1.0/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. I. Hickson, 2012."WHATWG HTML Living Standard, Last Updated 13 March 2012, 9 Web Workers". Retrieved from http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/currentwork/multipage/workers.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. I. Hickson. 2012. "HTML5 Web Messaging". W3C Candidate Recommendation 01 May 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/webmessaging/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. P. Viola, and M. Jones. 2001. "Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features". In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001. CVPR 2001. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. I-511). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. G. Shires and H. Wennborg. 2012. "Web Speech API Specification". 19 October 2012. Retrieved from: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/speech-api/raw-file/tip/speechapi.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. I. Hickson. 2012. "The WebSocket API". W3C Candidate Recommendation 20 September 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/websockets/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. A. van Kesteren. 2012. "XMLHttpRequest Level 2". W3C Working Draft 17 January 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest2/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. J. Mann. 2012. "High Resolution Time". W3C Recommendation 17 December 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/hr-time/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. J. Mann, Z. Wang and A. Quach. 2012. "User Timing". Editor's Draft July 11, 2012. Retrieved from: https://w3c.github.io/web-performance/specs/UserTiming/Overview.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. A. Jain, J. Mann, Z. Wang and A. Quach. 2014. "Resource Timing". Editor's Draft June 09, 2014. Retrieved from: https://w3c.github.io/web-performance/specs/ResourceTiming/Overview.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Z. Wang and A. Jain. 2013. "Navigation Timing". Editor's Draft January 25th, 2013. Retrieved from: https://w3c.github.io/web-performance/specs/NavigationTiming/Overview.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. A. van Kesteren, A. Gregor, Msger, A. Russell and R. Berjon. 2014. "W3C DOM4". W3C Candidate Recommendation 08 May 2014. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/dom/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. HTML5: Drag and drop: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WDhtml5-20101019/dnd.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. HTML5: Focus management: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/editing.html#focusGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. J. Mann and A. Jain. 2013."Page Visibility (Second Edition)". W3C Recommendation 29 October 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/page-visibility/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. A. van Kesteren and T. Çelik. 2012. "Fullscreen API". W3C Working Draft 03 July 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/fullscreen/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. V. Scheib. 2013. "Pointer Lock API". W3C Candidate Recommendation 17 December 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/pointerlock/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. HTML5: Session history and navigation: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110113/history.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Eynon R, Fry J and Schroeder, R. 2008. "The Ethics of Internet Research". In: G. Blank, R. Lee and N. Fielding (eds) Handbook of Online Research Methods. Sage: London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. R. Ferguson and S. Buckingham Shum. 2012. "Social learning analytics: five approaches". In: 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK '12), 29 Apr - 02 May 2012, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 23--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. S. Slade and P. Prinsloo. 2013. "Learning Analytics: Ethical Issues and Dilemmas". American Behavioral Scientist 0002764213479366, first published on March 4, 2013 doi:10.1177/0002764213479366Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. A. Pardo and G. Siemens. 2014. "Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics". British Journal of Educational Technology 45, 438--450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. A. K. Ghosh and T. M. Swaminatha. 2001. "Software security and privacy risks in mobile e-commerce". Commun. ACM 44, 2 (Feb. 2001), 51--57. DOI=10.1145/359205.359227 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/359205.359227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. P. Klasnja, S. Consolvo and T. Choudhury. 2009. "Exploring privacy concerns about personal sensing". In H. Tokuda, M. Beigl, A. Friday, A. J. Bernheim Brush & Y. Tobe (Eds). International conference pervasive (pp. 176--183). Berlin: Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. EUP. 1995. Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. European Union: European Parliament.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. EUP. 2002. Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector. European Union: European Parliament.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. EUP. 2014. The working party on the protection of individuals with regards to the processing of personal data. Opinion 05/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. D. Kay, N. Korn, and C. Oppenheim. 2012. "Legal, Risk and Ethical Aspects of Analytics in Higher Education". Center for Educational Technology & Interoperability Standards, vol. 1, no. 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A multimodal learning analytics view of HTML5 APIs: technical benefits and privacy risks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEEM '14: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
      October 2014
      711 pages
      ISBN:9781450328968
      DOI:10.1145/2669711

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader