skip to main content
10.1145/2668883.2668888acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswhConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Zero-Effort Camera-Assisted Calibration Techniques for Wearable Motion Sensors

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Activity recognition using wearable motion sensors plays an important role in pervasive wellness and healthcare monitoring applications. The activity recognition algorithms are often designed to work with a known orientation of sensors on the body. In the case of accidental displacement of the motion sensors, it is important to identify the new sensor location and orientation. This step, often called calibration or recalibration, requires extra effort from the user to either perform a set of known movements, or enter information about the placement of the sensors manually. In this paper, we propose a camera-assisted calibration approach that does not require any extra effort from the user. The calibration is done seamlessly when the user appears in front of the camera (in our case, a Kinect camera) and performs an arbitrary activity of choice (e.g., walking in front of the camera). We provide experimental results supporting the effectiveness of our approach.

References

  1. S. Mitchell, J. Collin, C. De Luca, A. Burrows, and L. Lipsitz, "Open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms in parkinson's disease: increased mediolateral activity during quiet standing," Neuroscience letters, vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 133--136, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. Pansiot, D. Stoyanov, D. McIlwraith, B. P. Lo, and G.-Z. Yang, "Ambient and wearable sensor fusion for activity recognition in healthcare monitoring systems," in 4th international workshop on wearable and implantable body sensor networks (BSN 2007), pp. 208--212, Springer, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. U. Steinhoff and B. Schiele, "Dead reckoning from the pocket-an experimental study," in Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 162--170, IEEE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Chavarriaga, H. Bayati, and J. D. Millán, "Unsupervised adaptation for acceleration-based activity recognition: robustness to sensor displacement and rotation," Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 479--490, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Henpraserttae, S. Thiemjarus, and S. Marukatat, "Accurate activity recognition using a mobile phone regardless of device orientation and location," in Body Sensor Networks (BSN), 2011 International Conference on, pp. 41--46, IEEE, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Kale, J. Lee, R. Lotfian, and R. Jafari, "Impact of sensor misplacement on dynamic time warping based human activity recognition using wearable computers," in Proceedings of the conference on Wireless Health, p. 7, ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K. Kunze and P. Lukowicz, "Dealing with sensor displacement in motion-based onbody activity recognition systems," in Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, pp. 20--29, ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. K. Forster, D. Roggen, and G. Troster, "Unsupervised classifier self-calibration through repeated context occurences: is there robustness against sensor displacement to gain?," in Wearable Computers, 2009. ISWC'09. International Symposium on, pp. 77--84, IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. K. Kunze, P. Lukowicz, H. Junker, and G. Tröster, "Where am i: Recognizing on-body positions of wearable sensors," in Location-and Context-Awareness, pp. 264--275, Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Kunze, P. Lukowicz, K. Partridge, and B. Begole, "Which way am i facing: Inferring horizontal device orientation from an accelerometer signal," in Wearable Computers, 2009. ISWC'09. International Symposium on, pp. 149--150, IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. O. Madgwick, A. J. Harrison, and R. Vaidyanathan, "Estimation of imu and marg orientation using a gradient descent algorithm," in Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 1--7, IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. J. Kuffner, "Effective sampling and distance metrics for 3d rigid body path planning," in Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA'04. 2004 IEEE International Conference on, vol. 4, pp. 3993--3998, IEEE, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Q. Huynh, "Metrics for 3d rotations: Comparison and analysis," Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 155--164, 2009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Zero-Effort Camera-Assisted Calibration Techniques for Wearable Motion Sensors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WH '14: Proceedings of the Wireless Health 2014 on National Institutes of Health
      October 2014
      97 pages
      ISBN:9781450331609
      DOI:10.1145/2668883

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • tutorial
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate35of139submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader