skip to main content
10.5555/2664323.2664340acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspringsimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Visual robot programming: linking design, simulation, and fabrication

Published:13 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the creative industry, architects and designers have to realize complex, prototypical projects without the profit margins or the economy of scale of other industries. One of the core enablers of such processes are fluid and efficient workflows that allow a maximum of flexibility throughout the design process. However, rather than fully automating the design process, approaches are required that allow quick and intuitive changes of key parameters. Using visual programming tools, architects and designers are now able to create their own virtual simulation environments, where they can change key parameters with the push of a slider, and observe the results on their designs in real time. This research shows approaches how parametric environments can be extended beyond simple design iterations to directly link the design with robotic fabrication. Due to their inherent multifunctionality, robotic arms are of special interest to the creative industry and can profit from the similar versatility of visual programming environments.

References

  1. Braumann J. and Brell-Cokcan, S. 2011. Parametric Robot Control: Integrated CAD/CAM for Architectural Design. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the ACADIA, Calgary. 242--251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brell-Cokcan S. and Braumann, J. 2010. A New Parametric Design Tool for Robot Milling. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the ACADIA, New York. 357--363.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brell-Cokcan S. and Comploi D. 2006. Method for controlling bending machines WO 2006055998 A1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cross, N., Naughton, J., and Walker, D. 1981. Design Method and Scientific Method. Design Studies 2 (4). 195--201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Davis, D. and Peters, B. 2013. Design Ecosystems: Customising the Architectural Design Enviroment with Software Plug-ins. Architectural Design 83 (2). 124--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fleischmann, M. and Menges, A. 2012. Physics-Based Modeling as an Alternative Approach to Geometrical Constrain-Modeling for the Design of Elastically-Deformable Material Systems. Proceedings of the 30th eCAADe Conference, Prague. 565--576.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. MacDowell, P. and Tomova, D. 2011. Robotic Rod-bending: Digital Drawing in Physical Space. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the ACADIA, Calgary. 132--137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Pigram, D., Maxwell, I., McGee, W., Hagenhofer-Daniell, B., and Vasey, L. 2012. Protocols, Pathways, and Production. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art, and Design - Rob|Arch, Vienna. 143--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pottmann, H., Asperl, A., Hofer, M., and Kilian A. 2007. Architectural Geometry. Exton, Bentley Institute Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Rohmer, E., Singh S. P. N., and Freese, M. 2013. V-REP: a Versatile and Scalable Robot Simulation Framework. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo. 1321--1326.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Visual robot programming: linking design, simulation, and fabrication

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader