Attitude and usage of collaboration tools in GSE: a practitioner oriented theory

ABSTRACT

Collaboration tools support global software engineering (GSE) by providing relevant information and work context to developers, essentially seeking to provide a local context for developers working globally. Although many collaborative tools have been developed, we have insufficient knowledge of how they are used in practice. In this paper, we review the recent empirical studies on collaboration tools for GSE. Then we theorize a conceptual framework that aims to explain how the unique contextual dimensions of GSE (e.g. culture diversity and adaptation, etc.) influence practitioners' attitudes toward, and usage of, the tools. The conceptual framework will guide our future empirical studies, and it will be refined by the empirical evidence collected in these studies.

References

1. P. Hinds, and M. Mortensen, "Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: An empirical investigation," Organization Science, vol. 16, pp. 290--307, 2005.
2. R. Zolin, P. Hinds, R. Fruchter, and R. Levitt, "Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: A longitudinal study," Information & Organizations, vol. 14, pp. 1--26, 2004.
3. J. D. Herbsleb and A. Mockus, "An Empirical Study of Speed and Communication in Globally Distributed Software Development," IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, vol. 29, no.3, pp. 1--14, 2003.
4. D. Damian, L. Izquierdo, J. Singer, and I. Kwan, "Awareness in the Wild: Why Communication Breakdowns Occur," Proc. ICGSE, 2007, pp.81--90.
5. B., Al-Ani, S. Marczak, E. Trainer, D. Redmiles, and R. Prikladnicki, "Distributed developers' perspectives of Web 2.0 technologies in supporting the development of trust," Workshop on The Future of Collaborative Software Development, 2012.
6. B., Al-Ani, E. Trainer, D. Redmiles, and E. Simmons, "Trust and surprise in distributed teams: Towards an understanding of expectations and adaptations," Proc. ICIC, 2012, To Appear.
7. J. T. Biehl, M. Czerwinski, G. Smith, and G. G. Robertson, "FASTDash: a visual dashboard for fostering awareness in software teams," Proc. CHI, 2007, pp.1313--1322.
8. A. Sarma, D. F. Redmiles, and A. V. D. Hoek, "Empirical evidence of the benefits of workspace awareness in software configuration management," Proc. SIGSOFT FSE, 2008, pp.113--123.
9. C. Treude and M. D. Storey, "Awareness 2.0: staying aware of projects, developers and tasks using dashboards and feeds," Proc. ICSE, 2010, pp.365--374.
10. A. Sarma, L. Maccherone, P. Wagstrom, and J. D. Herbsleb, "Tesseract: Interactive visual exploration of socio-technical relationships in software development," Proc. ICSE, 2009, pp.23--33.
11. A. Begel, Y. P. Khoo, and T. Zimmermann, "Codebook: discovering and exploiting relationships in software repositories," Proc. ICSE, 2010, pp.125--134.
12. T. Fritz and G. C. Murphy, "Determining relevancy: how software developers determine relevant information in feeds," Proc. CHI, 2011, pp.1827--1830.
13. Y. Dittrich and R. Giuffrida, " Exploring the role of instant messaging in a global software development project," Proc. ICGSE, 2011, pp.103--112.
14. I. Ajzen, "The theory of planned behavior," In P. A. M. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski and E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Sage. 2012.
15. D. Zhao and M. B. Rosson, "How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work," in Proc. GROUP, 2009, pp.243--252.