skip to main content
10.1145/2662155.2662207acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Participation for development

Published:06 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is more and more promoted as a driver and facilitator of economic growth and development in low and middle income countries. ICT for Development (ICT4D) though has mixed successes. Sustainability of solutions and usability respectively usefulness for the intended beneficiaries have been reported as causes. Participatory approaches to development have been proposed to address these causes. Participatory Design (PD) seems like a perfect fit. However, at the Participatory Design Conferences, research that addresses PD in low and middle income countries is rare. The workshop aims at bringing together the PD researchers working with under-privileged communities and attracting researchers from the ICT4D communities to the PD conference. The goal is to share experiences and start a discussion on how participation, ICT and development might relate.

References

  1. Avgerou, C. Discourses on ICT and development. Information Technologies and International Development, 2010, 6 (3), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dittrich, Y., Eriksén, S., & Wessles, B. Learning through Situated Innovation -- Why the Specific is Crucial for Participatory Design Research. Accepted for Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gonsalves, T. A., Dittrich, Y., Vaidyanathan, L., Jhunjhunwala, A. Prototyping Socio-Technical Systems for Banking Services for Rural India. Presented at: Learning from Marginalized Users: Reciprocity in HCI4D, Workshop at the CSCW 2012, Seattle Washington.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Heeks, R. The ICT4D 2.0 Manifesto: Where next for ICTs and International Development? Working Paper Series, Paper No.42. Development Informatics Group. Institute for Development Policy and Management 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mechael, P., & Searle, S. Barriers and Gaps Affecting mHealth in Low and Middle Income Countries?: Policy White Paper. 2010, 1--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sen, A. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Winschiers-Theophilus, H. The Challenges of Participatory Design in an Intercultural Context: Designing for Usability in Namibia. Proc. of the PDC 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Participation for development

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PDC '14: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts - Volume 2
      October 2014
      278 pages
      ISBN:9781450332149
      DOI:10.1145/2662155

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader