skip to main content
10.1145/2661435.2661444acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Stakeholder participation in the development of an electronic medical record system in Malawi

Published:06 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we are concerned with stakeholders' participation in the development of an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system for health facilities in Malawi, Africa. We draw on insights gained during the process of an Action Research project, which involved different stakeholders. We examine the different roles and forms of participation of these stakeholders. Through this, we illustrate how participation changes over time and co-evolves with the progress of the project. Our analysis also reveals that, in rural low-resource settings, expected end-users of EMR systems do not always have the health domain knowledge or expertise to effectively participate in such design projects. Therefore, participation of managers and other health domain experts is essential in order to supplement users' limited specialized knowledge of the domain.

References

  1. Avison, D. E. & Fitzgerald, G. Information systems development: methodologies, techniques & tools, London, McGraw-Hill.2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Balka, E. Broadening Discussion About Participatory Design: A replyto Kyng. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 22,1.2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. & Ståhlbrost, A. Participatory Design - One Step Back or Two Steps Forward? Proc. PDC 2008, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bjerknes, G. & Bratteteig, T. User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 7,1, 73--98.1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Braa, J. Community-based Participatory Design in the third world. Proc. PDC 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bratteteig, T. & Wagner, I. Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design. Proc. PDC 2012: ACM, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Byrne, E. & Sahay, S. Participatory Design for Social Development: A South African Case Study on Community-Based Health Information Systems. Information Technology for Development, 13,1, 71--94.2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bødker, K., Kensing, F. & Simonsen, J. Participatory IT Design. Designing for Business and Workplace Realities, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bødker, K., Kensing, F. & Simonsen, J. Participatory Design in Information Systems Development. In: Isomäki, H. and Pekkola, S. (eds.) Reframing Humans in Information Systems Development. Springer London.2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavaye, A. L. M. User participation in system development revisited. Information & Management, 28,5, 311--323.1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dalsgaard, P. Participatory Design in Large-Scale Public Projects: Challenges and Opportunities. Design Issues, 28,3, 34--47.2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Damodaran, L. User involvement in the systems design process-a practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15,6, 363--377.1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Elovaara, P., Igira, F. T. & Mörtberg, C. Whose participation? whose knowledge?: exploring PD in Tanzania-Zanzibar and Sweden. Proc. PDC 2006,105--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Iivari, J., Isomäki, H. & Pekkola, S. The user -- the great unknown of systems development: reasons, forms, challenges, experiences and intellectual contributions of user involvement. Information Systems Journal, 20,2, 109--117.2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ives, B. & Olson, M. H. User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research. Management Science, 30,5, 586--603.1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Johannessen, L. K. & Ellingsen, G. Lightweight Design Methods in Integrated Practices. Design Issues, 28,3, 22--33.2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kensing, F. & Blomberg, J. Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7167--185.1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kimaro, H. C. & Titlestad, O. H. Challenges of user participation in the design of a computer based system: The possibility of participatory customisation in low income countries. JHIDC 2,1, 1.2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Korpela, M., Soriyan, H. A., Olufokunbi, K. C., Onayade, A. A., Davies-Adetugbo, A. & Adesanmi, D. Community Participation in Health Informatics in Africa: An Experiment in Tripartite Partnership in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7,3-4, 339--358.1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lynch, T. & Gregor, S. User participation in decision support systems development: Influencing system outcomes. Eur J Inf Syst, 13,4, 286--301.2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mueller, D. H., Lungu, D., Acharya, A. & Palmer, N. Constraints to Implementing the Essential Health Package in Malawi. PLoS ONE, 6,6, e20741.2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mumford, E. Participative Systems Design: Structure and Method. Systems, Objectives, Solutions, 1,1, 5--19.1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Oostveen, A.-M. & Van den Besselaar, P. From small scale to large scale user participation: a case study of participatory design in e-government systems. Proc. PDC 2004: ACM, 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Puri, S. K., Sahay, S. & Lewis, J. Building participatory HIS networks: A case study from Kerala, India. Information and Organization, 19,2, 63--83.2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Robertson, T. & Simonsen, J. Challenges and Opportunities in Contemporary Participatory Design. Design Issues, 28,3, 3--9.2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Robertson, T. & Simonsen, J. Participatory Design. An introduction. In: Simonsen, J. and Robertson, T. (eds.) Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. New York: Routledge 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Simonsen, J. & Hertzum, M. Sustained Participatory Design: Extending the Iterative Approach. Design Issues, 28,3, 10--21.2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Stakeholder participation in the development of an electronic medical record system in Malawi

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PDC '14: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1
      October 2014
      178 pages
      ISBN:9781450322560
      DOI:10.1145/2661435

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      PDC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate17of62submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader