skip to main content
10.1145/2659021.2659034acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Sparse Matching of Random Patches for Person Re-Identification

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most of the open challenges in person re-identification are introduced by the large variations of human appearance and from the different camera views deployed to monitor the environment. To tackle these challenges, almost all state-of-the-art methods assume that all image pixels are equally relevant to the task, hence they are used in the feature extraction procedure. However, it is not guaranteed the a pixel sensed by one camera is viewed by a different one, so computing the person signature using such pixel might bring uninformative data in the feature matching phase. We believe that only some portions of the image are relevant to the re-identification task. Inspired by this, we introduce a novel algorithm that: (i) randomly samples a set of image patches to compute the person signature; (ii) uses the correlation matrix computed between such patches as a weighing tool in the signature matching process; (iii) brings sparsity in the correlation matrix so as only relevant patches are used in the matching phase. To validate the proposed approach, we have compared our performance to state-of-the-art methods using two publicly available benchmark datasets. Results show that superior performance to existing approaches are achieved.

References

  1. T. Avraham, I. Gurvich, M. Lindenbaum, and S. Markovitch. Learning Implicit Transfer for Person Re-identification. In ECCV Workshops and Demonstrations, pages 381--390, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Bazzani, M. Cristani, and V. Murino. Symmetry-driven accumulation of local features for human characterization and re-identification. CVIU, 117(2):130--144, Nov. 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Bazzani, M. Cristani, A. Perina, and V. Murino. Multiple-shot person re-identification by chromatic and epitomic analyses. Pattern Recognition Letters, Nov. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Bäěk, E. Corvée, F. Brémond, and M. Thonnat. Boosted human re-identification using Riemannian manifolds. Image and Vision Computing, 30(6-7):443--452, June 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection. In CVPR, pages 886--893, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Dikmen, E. Akbas, T. S. Huang, and N. Ahuja. Pedestrian Recognition with a Learned Metric. In ACCV, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Hirzer, P. M. Roth, and H. Bischof. Person Re-identification by Efficient Impostor-Based Metric Learning. In AVSS, pages 203--208, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Hirzer, P. M. Roth, K. Martin, and H. Bischof. Relaxed Pairwise Learned Metric for Person Re-identification. In ECCV, pages 780--793, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. O. Javed, K. Shafique, Z. Rasheed, and M. Shah. Modeling inter-camera space-time and appearance relationships for tracking across non-overlapping views. CVIU, 109(2):146--162, Feb. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. I. Kviatkovsky, A. Adam, and E. Rivlin. Color Invariants for Person Re-Identification. IEEE TPAMI, 35(7):1622--1634, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. C. Liu, S. Gong, C. C. Loy, and X. Lin. Person Re-identification: What Features Are Important? In ECCV Workshops and Demonstrations, pages 391--401, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B. Ma, Y. Su, and F. Jurie. BiCov: a novel image representation for person re-identification and face verification. BMVC, pages 57.1--57.11, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. B. Ma, Y. Su, and F. Jurie. Local Descriptors Encoded by Fisher Vectors for Person Re-identification. In ECCV Workshops and Demonstrations, pages 413--422, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. N. Martinel and C. Micheloni. Re-identify people in wide area camera network. In CVPRW, pages 31--36, June 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. N. Martinel, C. Micheloni, and G. L. Foresti. Saliency Weighted Features for Person Re-Identification. In ECCV Workshops and Demonstrations, number i, pages 1--17, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. N. Martinel, C. Micheloni, and C. Piciarelli. Distributed Signature Fusion for Person Re-Identification. In ICDSC, pages 1--6, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. N. Martinel, C. Micheloni, and C. Piciarelli. Learning pairwise feature dissimilarities for person re-identification. In ICDSC, pages 1--6, Oct. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. N. Martinel, C. Micheloni, C. Piciarelli, and G. L. Foresti. Camera Selection for Adaptive Human-Computer Interface. IEEE TSMC: Systems, 44(5):653--664, May 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, and T. Maenpaa. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE TPAMI, 24(7):971--987, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Piciarelli, C. Micheloni, and G. Foresti. PTZ camera network reconfiguration. In ICDSC, pages 1--7, Aug. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. W. R. Schwartz and L. S. Davis. Learning Discriminative Appearance-Based Models Using Partial Least Squares. In Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing, pages 322--329, Oct. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Vernier, N. Martinel, C. Micheloni, and G. L. Foresti. Remote feature learning for mobile re-identification. In ICDSC, pages 1--6, Oct. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Y. Wu, M. Minoh, M. Mukunoki, W. Li, and S. Lao. Collaborative Sparse Approximation for Multiple-Shot Across-Camera Person Re-identification. In AVSS, pages 209--214, Sept. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. G. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Kato, T. Marutani, and M. Kenji. Local distance comparison for multiple-shot people re-identification. In ACCV, pages 677--690, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. R. Zhao, W. Ouyang, and X. Wang. Unsupervised Salience Learning for Person Re-identification. In CVPR, pages 3586--3593, June 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Sparse Matching of Random Patches for Person Re-Identification

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICDSC '14: Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras
      November 2014
      286 pages
      ISBN:9781450329255
      DOI:10.1145/2659021
      • General Chair:
      • Andrea Prati,
      • Publications Chair:
      • Niki Martinel

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 November 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • tutorial
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ICDSC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate49of69submissions,71%Overall Acceptance Rate92of117submissions,79%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader