skip to main content
10.1145/2658537.2658538acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Playing with strangers: understanding temporary teams in league of legends

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Game researchers have extensively studied how players form long-term social organizations such as guilds and clans to accomplish complex tasks such as raiding in online games. Few studies have paid attention to how temporary teams (or pickup groups) composed of strangers fulfill complex tasks. Riot Games' League of Legends, a team-based competitive online game, is played by two temporary teams. Players must collaborate with strangers in a relatively short time (about 30-50 minutes). How do players interact and collaborate with their teammates in temporary teams? To answer this question, we conducted an ethnographic study within the League of Legends community. We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with experienced players. We found that rich social interaction exists within temporary teams. Players want to collaborate with strangers through communication and coordination. They discipline their own ways of interaction to facilitate collaboration. They try to exert influence over their teammates. We further discuss design implications for facilitating collaboration among strangers.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p161.mp4

mp4

280.1 MB

References

  1. Bardzell, J., Nichols, J., Pace, T., and Bardzell, S. Come meet me at Ulduar: progression raiding in world of warcraft. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work CSCW '12, ACM Press (2012), 603. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., Pace, T., and Reed, K. Blissfully productive: grouping and cooperation in world of warcraft instance runs. Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work CSCW '08, ACM Press (2008), 357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Blizzard Entertainment. Heroes of the Storm. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, B. and Bell, M. CSCW at play: 'there'as a collaborative virtual environment. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work CSCW '04, ACM Press (2004), 350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dabbish, L., Kraut, R., and Patton, J. Communication and commitment in an online game team. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '12, ACM Press (2012), 879. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ducheneaut, N. and Moore, R.J. The social side of gaming: a study of interaction patterns in a massively multiplayer online game. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work CSCW '04, ACM Press (2004), 360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., and Moore, R.J. "Alone together?": exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems CHI '06, ACM Press (2006), 407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., and Moore, R.J. The life and death of online gaming communities. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '07, ACM Press (2007), 839. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ekbia, H. and Nardi, B. Inverse Instrumentality: How Technologies Objectify Patients and Players. In Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World. MI: University of Michigan Press., Ann Arbor, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Eklund, L. and Johansson, M. Social Play? A study of social interaction in temporary group formation (PUG) in World of Warcraft. DiGRA Nordic, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Foo, C.Y. and Koivisto, E.M.I. Defining grief play in MMORPGs: player and developer perceptions. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology - ACE '04, ACM Press (2004), 245--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., and McGuire, T. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39 (1984), 1123--1134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kou, Y. and Nardi, B. Regulating Anti-Social Behavior on the Internet?: The Example of League of Legends. iConference 2013 Proceedings, (2013), 616--622.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kou, Y. and Nardi, B. Governance in League of Legends: A Hybrid System. Foundation of Digital Games, (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuznekoff, J.H. and Rose, L.M. Communication in multiplayer gaming: Examining player responses to gender cues. New Media & Society 15, 4 (2012), 541--556.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. KWOH, S. Announcing Team Builder two-day live beta! http://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/news/gameupdates/features/announcing-team-builder-two-daylive-beta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindtner, S., Nardi, B., Wang, Y., Mainwaring, S., Jing, H., and Liang, W. A hybrid cultural ecology: world of warcraft in China. Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work CSCW '08, ACM Press (2008), 371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mason, W. and Clauset, A. Friends FTW! friendship and competition in halo. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work CSCW '13, ACM Press (2013), 375. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nardi, B. and Harris, J. Strangers and friends: collaborative play in world of warcraft. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work CSCW '06, ACM Press (2006), 149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. O'Sullivan, P.B. and Flanagin, A.J. Reconceptualizing "flaming" and other problematic messages. New Media & Society 5, 1 (2003), 69--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ostrom, E. Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 14, 3 (2000), 137--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Pisan, Y. My Guild, My People: Role of Guilds in Massively Multiplayer Online Games. RMIT University (2007), 20:1--20:5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Riot Games. The Honor System. http://gameinfo.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/gameinfo/get-started/honor/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Riot Games. League of Legends. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Shamir, B., House, R.J., and Arthur, M.B. The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory. Organization Science 4, 4 (1993), 577--594. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sherr, I. Player Tally for "League of Legends" Surges. 2014. http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2014/01/27/player-tallyfor-league-of-legends-surges/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Shores, K.B., He, Y., Swanenburg, K.L., Kraut, R., and Riedl, J. The identification of deviance and its impact on retention in a multiplayer game. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing CSCW '14, ACM Press (2014), 1356-- 1365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Valve. "DOTA 2."2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Williams, D., Caplan, S., and Xiong, L. Can You Hear Me Now? The Impact of Voice in an Online Gaming Community. Human Communication Research 33, 4 (2007), 427--449.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Xu, Y., Cao, X., Sellen, A., Herbrich, R., and Graepel, T. Sociable killers: Understanding Social Relationships in an Online First-person Shooter Game. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work CSCW '11, ACM Press (2011), 197. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yee, N. Motivations for Play in Online Games. CyberPsychology & Behavior 9, (2006), 772--775.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Zhong, Z.-J. The effects of collective MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games) play on gamers' online and offline social capital. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 6 (2011), 2352--2363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. The Tribunal. http://na.leagueoflegends.com/Tribunal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Playing with strangers: understanding temporary teams in league of legends

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI PLAY '14: Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play
      October 2014
      492 pages
      ISBN:9781450330145
      DOI:10.1145/2658537

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI PLAY '14 Paper Acceptance Rate30of104submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader