skip to main content
10.1145/2656434.2656437acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiteConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Printer watermark obfuscation

Published:13 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most color laser printers manufactured and sold today add "invisible" information to make it easier to determine when a particular document was printed and exactly which printer was used. Some manufacturers have acknowledged the existence of the tracking information in their documentation while others have not. None of them have explained exactly how it works or the scope of the information that is conveyed. There are no laws or regulations that require printer companies to track printer users this way, and none that prevent them from ceasing this practice or providing customers a means to opt out of being tracked. The tracking information is coded by patterns of yellow dots that the printers add to every page they print. The details of the patterns vary by manufacturer and printer model.

In this document, our team will discuss several obfuscation methods and demonstrate a successful one.

Included in this document is an explanation of the firmware generated yellow dots matrix and answers to the following questions: 1. Which printers produce the dots? 2. How are the dots put on? 3. What is needed for testing? 4. What is the dot size and spacing? 5. Where are the dots located on the page? 6. How can the dots be rendered useless?

References

  1. Schoen, S. October 16, 2005. Secret code in color printers lets government track you. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved November 3, 2013 from https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2005/10/16Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. EFF. List of printers which do or do not display tracking dots. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved September 22, 2013 from https://www.eff.org/pages/list-printers-which-do-or-do-not-display-tracking-dotsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. EFF. DocuColor Tracking Dot Decoding Guide. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved September 22, 2013 from https://w2.eff.org/Privacy/printers/docucolor/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Neufeld, B. 2008 -- 2012. FOIA request nets list of manufacturers. Brahm's Yellow Dots. Retrieved September 22, 2013 from http://brahmsyellowdots.blogspot.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Prewitt, K. 2012. Freedom of information act appeal -- file no. 20100517. U.S. Department of Homeland Security United States Secret Service. Retrieved September 22, 2013 from http://www.scribd.com/doc/94599181/FOIA-release-names-spy-printersGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Steganographix, 2013--2014. Steganographix Documentation Retrieved May 20, 2014 from https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B9ZrovajUPg2NFEtNXZKUi02Tjg&usp=sharingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Steganographix, 2013--2014. Steganographix Images Retrieved May 20, 2014 from https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B9ZrovajUPg2U3Z2Ul9WSXI0b1U&usp=sharingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved September 22, 2013 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ObfuscationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Printer watermark obfuscation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        RIIT '14: Proceedings of the 3rd annual conference on Research in information technology
        October 2014
        98 pages
        ISBN:9781450327114
        DOI:10.1145/2656434

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 October 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        RIIT '14 Paper Acceptance Rate14of39submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate51of116submissions,44%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader