skip to main content
10.1145/2652524.2652545acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Motivated software engineers are engaged and focused, while satisfied ones are happy

Published:18 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Context -- Motivation and job satisfaction are not the same thing, and although business organization research recognized this a long time ago, in Software Engineering research, we have not. As a result, thirty years of research on motivation in software engineering has produced knowledge on what makes software engineers generally happier, but not about how to increase their motivation. Goal -- In this article, we aim to identify visible signs of a software engineer who is motivated to work. Method -- We describe a field study in which 62 practitioners in Brazil reported their view of "motivation" in the context of their practical work. Data was collected by means of audio-recorded semi-structured interviews, and a thematic analysis was applied to identify the most relevant descriptors of motivation. Results -- Our data reveal that (1) motivated Software Engineers are engaged, focused, and collaborative; and (2) the term "motivation" is used as an umbrella term to cover several distinct organizational behaviours that are not necessarily related to the individual's desire to work. Conclusions -- Without a clear picture of the difference between these two concepts, work-based motivation programs may not be designed effectively to address either turnover or performance issues. Overall, this work indicates the need for a more effective conceptual system to investigate and encourage both job satisfaction and work motivation in software engineering research and practice.

References

  1. Beecham, S., Badoo, N., Hall, T., Robinson, H., and Sharp, H., 2007. Motivation in Software Engineering: A systematic literature review, Information and Software Technology, 50, 860--878. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. França, A. C. C., Gouveia, T. B., Santos, P. C. F., Santana, C. A., and da Silva, F. Q. B., 2011. Motivation in Software Engineering - A Systematic Review Update., In: 15th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering EASE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sharp, H., Badoo, N., Beecham, S., Hall, T., and Robinson, H., 2008. Models of motivation in software engineering, Information and Software Technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. França, A. C. C., Felix, A. L., and da Silva, F. Q. B., 2012. Towards an Explanatory Theory of Motivation in Software Engineering: A Qualitative Case Study of a Government Organization, In: International Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. França, A. C. C., Carneiro, D. E. S., and da Silva, F. Q. B., 2012. Towards an Explanatory Theory of Motivation in Software Engineering: A Qualitative Case Study of a Small Software Company, In: Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium of Software Engineering (SBES). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. França, A. C. C., Araújo, A. C., and Silva, F. Q. B., 2013. Motivation of Software Engineers: A Qualitative Case Study of a Research and Development Organisation, In: Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. França, A. C. C., da Silva, F. Q. B., Felix, A. L., and Carneiro, D. E., 2013. Motivation in Software Engineering Industrial Practice: A Cross-Case Analysis of Two Software Organisations, Information and Software Technology, Available online.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Locke, E. A., and Latham, G., 1990. WORK MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION: Light at the End of the Tunnel, Psychological Science, 240--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Judge, T., Thoresen, C., Bono, J., and Patton, G., 2001. The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review, Psychological bulletin, 127, 3, 376--407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Boselie, P., Dietz, G., and Boon, C., 2005. Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research, Human Resource Management Journal, 15, 3, 67--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hackman, J. R., and Oldham, G. R., 1976. Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 250--279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Latham, G., and Ernst, T., 2006. Keys to motivating tomorrow's workforce, Human Resource Management Review, 16, 2, 181--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Amabile, T. M., and Kramer, S., 2011. The progress principle: using small wins to ignite Joy, Engagement, and Creativity at work, Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Locke, E. A., 1969. What is job satisfaction?, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 309--336 (1969).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Golembiewski, R. T., 2000. Handbook of Organizational Behavior, 2 ed., New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Weiss, H. M., 2002. Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences, Human Resource Management Review, 12, 173--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Locke, E. A., 1976. The nature and causes of job satisfaction, in Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, Rand McNally, 1297--1349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ambrose, M. L., and Kulik, C. T., 1999. Old Friends, New Faces: Motivation Research in the 1990s, Journal of Management, 25, 3, 231--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Oldham, G. R., and Hackman, J. R., 2005. How Job Characteristics Theory Happened, in The Oxford handbook of management theory: The process of theory development, Smith, K. G. and Hitt, M. A., Eds., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 151--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, T., Badoo, N., Beecham, S., Robinson, H., and Sharp, H., 2009. A systematic review of Theory use in studies investigating the motivations of software engineers., ACM Trans. Soft. Eng. Methodol., 18, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Maslow, A., 1954. Motivation and Personality.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Herzberg, F., 1964. One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees?, Harvard Business Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Vroom, V. H., 1964. Work and Motivation, New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Locke, E. A., 1968. Toward a Theory of Task Motivation and Incentives, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. R. Hackman, J., Oldham, G., Janson, R., and Purdy, K., 1975. A New Strategy for Job Enrichment, California Management Review, 57--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Cruzes, D., and Dybå, T., 2011. Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study, Information and Software Technology, 53, 5, 440--455. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sach, R., Sharp, H., and Petre, M., 2010. Continued involvement in software development: motivational factors, In: Proceedings of Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Korunka, C., Hoonaker, P., and Carayon, P., 2008. Quality of working life and turnover intention in information technology work, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 18, 4, 409--423. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Potter, L. E., von Hellens, L. A., and Nielsen, S. H., 2009. Childhood interest in IT and the choice of IT as a career: the experiences of a group of IT, In: Proceedings of ACM Annual Conference of the Special Interest Group Management Information Systems and Computer Personnel Research (SIGCPR). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Benbya, H., and Belbaly, N., 2010. Understanding Developers' Motives in Open Source Projects: A Multi-Theoretical Framework, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27, 30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Hilkert, D., Benlian, A., and Hess, T., 2010. Motivational Drivers to Develop Apps for Social Software-Platforms: The Example of Facebook, In: Proceedings of American Conference on Information Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang, Y., 2009. What motivate software engineers to refactor source code? Evidences from professional developers, In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, (ICSM).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jørgensen, N., 2007. Developer autonomy in the FreeBSD open source project, Journal of Management and Governance, 11, 2, 119--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Beecham, S., Sharp, H., Badoo, N., Hall, T., and Robinson, H., 2007. Does the XP environment meet the motivational needs of the software developer? An empirical study, In: AGILE 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. da Silva, F. Q. B., and França, A. C. C., 2012. Towards understanding the underlying structure of motivational factors for software engineers to guide the definition of motivational programs, Journal of Systems and Software (JSS), 85, 2, 216--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Corbin, J., and Strauss, A., 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed., Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Noblit, G. W., and Hare, R. D., 1988. Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies (Qualitative Research Methods), Sage Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Cruzes, D. S., and Dybå, T., 2011. Recommended Steps for Thematic Synthesis in Software Engineering, In: International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Maslow, A. H., 1943. Preface to motivation theory, Psychosomatic Medicine, 85--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work, Applied psychology: an international review, 48(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Motivated software engineers are engaged and focused, while satisfied ones are happy

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ESEM '14: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
      September 2014
      461 pages
      ISBN:9781450327749
      DOI:10.1145/2652524

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 September 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ESEM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate23of123submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate130of594submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader