skip to main content
10.1145/2644866.2644870acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocengConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Humanist-centric tools for big data: berkeley prosopography services

Published:16 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe Berkeley Prosopography Services (BPS), a new set of tools for prosopography - the identification of individuals and study of their interactions - in support of humanities research. Prosopography is an example of "big data" in the humanities, characterized not by the size of the datasets, but by the way that computational and data-driven methods can transform scholarly workflows. BPS is based upon re-usable infrastructure, supporting generalized web services for corpus management, social network analysis, and visualization. The BPS disambiguation model is a formal implementation of the traditional heuristics used by humanists, and supports plug-in rules for adaptation to a wide range of domain corpora. A workspace model supports exploratory research and collaboration. We contrast the BPS model of configurable heuristic rules to other approaches for automated text analysis, and explain how our model facilitates interpretation by humanist researchers. We describe the significance of the BPS assertion model in which researchers assert conclusions or possibilities, allowing them to override automated inference, to explore ideas in what-if scenarios, and to formally publish and subscribe-to asserted annotations among colleagues, and/or with students. We present an initial evaluation of researchers' experience using the tools to study corpora of cuneiform tablets, and describe plans to expand the application of the tools to a broader range of corpora.

References

  1. Ahmed, A. 2011. The Religious Elite of the Early Islamic Hijaz : Five Prosopographical Case Studies. Occasional Publications of the Oxford Unit for Prosopographical Research 14. Oxford: Unit for Prosopographical Research Linacre College University of Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Booth, A. 2013. Brief Overview of Curating Lives: Museums, Archives, Online Sites, Autobiography, Biography, and Life Writing session, MLA Commons, Jan 5 2013. Available at: http://commons.mla.org/docs/a-brief-synopsis-of-curating-lives-mla-paper-alison-booth/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bostock, M., et al. 2011. D3: Data-Driven Documents, IEEE Trans. Visualization & Comp. Graphics (Proc. InfoVis), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brandes, U., et al. 2000. The GraphML file format.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Csillag, K. 2013. Fuzzy anchoring (blog post, April 22, 2013). Available at: http://hypothes.is/blog/fuzzy-anchoring.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Elson, D., Dames, N., and McKeown, K. 2010, Extracting Social Networks from Literary Fiction, Proc. of 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 138--147, Uppsala, Sweden, 11-16 July 2010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fielding, R., and Taylor, R. 2002. Principled design of the modern Web architecture. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 2,2 (May 2002) DOI=10.1145/514183.514185 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gerritsen, A. 2008. Prosopography and its Potential for Middle Period Research, Journal of Song-Yuan Studies Volume 38, 2008 pp. 161--201.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Higgins, S. 2011. Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline, International Journal of Digital Curation, 2011, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 78--88, doi:10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191. http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/184Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mueller, M. 2011. Collaboratively Curating Early Modern English Texts. Contributed essay to Project Bamboo wiki. https://wikihub.berkeley.edu/x/QAdRB. Accessed June 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. O'Madadhain, J., et al. 2005. Analysis and visualization of network data using JUNG. Journal of Statistical Software 10.2 (2005): 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pasin, M. 2012, Exploring Prosopographical Resources Through Novel Tools and Visualizations: a Preliminary Investigation, Digital Humanities 2012, Hamburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sanderson, R, et al. (eds.) Open Annotation Data Model, W3C Community Draft, Accessed July 2014. http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmitz, P., and Pearce, L., 2013. Berkeley Prosopography Services: Ancient Families, Modern Tools, DH-Case 2013 (workshop), ACM Document Engineering 2013, Florence, Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Szaley, A., 2012. Data-intensive discoveries in science: the fourth paradigm. Data-Intensive Distributed Computing 2012 (DIDC '12). DOI=10.1145/2286996.2286998 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. TEI P5: Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange, Ch. 13 Names, Dates, People, and Places, V 2.3.0. Available at: http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ND.html (accessed April 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Waerzeggers, C. 2003-2004. The Babylonian Revolts Against Xerxes and the 'End of Archives', Archiv für Orientforschung 50: 150--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Waerzeggers, C. 2013. Social Network Analysis of Cuneiform Archives: A New Approach. Proc. of the Second START Conference in Vienna (17-19th July 2008) Too Much Data? Generalizations and Model-building in Ancient Economic History on the Basis of Large Corpora of documentary Evidence, edited by H. D. Baker and Michael Jursa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Humanist-centric tools for big data: berkeley prosopography services

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                DocEng '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM symposium on Document engineering
                September 2014
                226 pages
                ISBN:9781450329491
                DOI:10.1145/2644866

                Copyright © 2014 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 16 September 2014

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                DocEng '14 Paper Acceptance Rate15of41submissions,37%Overall Acceptance Rate178of537submissions,33%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader