skip to main content
10.1145/2639108.2639144acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The case for UHF-band MU-MIMO

Published:07 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

While the UHF band exhibits superior propagation characteristics compared to other frequency bands used for broadband communications, limited spectral availability in time and space necessitates high spectral efficiency techniques such as Multi-user MIMO (MU-MIMO). In this paper we design and implement the first open MU-MIMO Software-Defined Radio (SDR) platform that operates on an order of magnitude frequency range, from 300 MHz to 5.8 GHz. We perform a comprehensive set of over-the-air experiments to evaluate the potential of UHF-band MU-MIMO in comparison to 2.4 and 5.8 GHz WiFi bands encompassing a range of operating environments. We evaluate MU-MIMO performance in both outdoor, indoor, line-of-sight (LOS), and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) environments, and demonstrate that while the temporal correlation of the measured UHF environment is increased, it does not come at the cost of increased spatial correlation as measured by the Demmel condition number, thus proving highly attractive for MU-MIMO. This evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of MU-MIMO transmission techniques in UHF bands for high spectral efficiency and low-overhead wireless access.

References

  1. Ettus USRP. Available at: https://www.ettus.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lime Microsystems LMS6002D. Available at: http://www.limemicro.com/products/LMS6002D.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mango Communications 802.11 Reference Design. Available at: http://mangocomm.com/802.11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Microsoft SORA. Available at: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/sora/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nutaq. Available at: http://nutaq.com/en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Rice University WARP project. Available at: http://warp.rice.edu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wurc documentation. Available at: http://http://www.volowireless.com/products/WURC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ofcom. Regulatory requirements for white space devices in the UHF TV band, Jul. 2012. Available at: www.cept.org/Documents/se-43/6161/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E. Aryafar, N. Anand, T. Salonidis, and E. Knightly. Design and experimental evaluation of multi-user beamforming in Wireless LANs. In Proc. ACM MobiCom, Chicago, IL, Sept. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Boyer, P. Brown, K. Hayler, M. Garcia, J. Mitchell, P. Moss, and M. Thorp. MIMO for Broadcast - results from a high-power UK trial. In Proc. IBC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Sept. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. G. Breit. Coherence Time Measurement for TGac Channel Model. In IEEE 802.11-09/1173r1, Nov. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 47, part 15, subpart H - Television Band Devices, Feb. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. I. Collings, H. Suzuki, and D. Robertson. Ngara broadband access system for rural and regional areas. Telecommunications Journal of Australia, 62(1), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Costa. Writing on dirty paper. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 29(3):439--441, May 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. Eriksson, S. Linder, K. Wiklundh, P. Holm, P. Johansson, F. Tufvesson, and A. Molisch. Urban peer-to-peer MIMO channel measurements and analysis at 300 MHz. In Proc. IEEE MILCOM, San Diego, CA, Nov. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. A. Flores, R. Guerra, E. Knightly, P. Ecclesine, and S. Pandey. IEEE 802.11af: A standard for TV white space spectrum sharing. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(10):92--100, Oct. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. A. Grebennikov. RF and Microwave Power Amplifier Design. McGraw-Hill, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Greenbaum and T. Chartier. Numerical Methods: Design, analysis, and computer implementation of algorithms. Princeton University Press, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Hammons, J. Hampton, N. Merheb, and M. Cruz. Cooperative MIMO field measurements for military UHF band in low-rise urban environments. In Proc. IEEE SAM, Darmstadt, Germany, Jul. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. Hampton, N. Merheb, W. Lain, D. Paunil, R. Shuford, J. Abrahamson, and W. Kasch. Propagation characteristics of ground based urban communications in the military UHF band. In Proc. IEEE MILCOM, Atlantic City, NJ, Oct. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. IEEE P802.11ac/D4.1. Specification framework for TGac, Nov. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Jung, J.-H. Kim, Y.-K. Yoon, and H.-J. Hong. Multipath characteristics of MIMO channel at the UHF band for wireless systems in the urban area. In Proc. IEEE ICACT, Phoenix Park, South Korea, Feb. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. F. Kaltenberger, D. Gesbert, R. Knopp, and M. Kountouris. Correlation and capacity of measured multi-user MIMO channels. In Proc. IEEE PIMRC, Cannes, France, Sept. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. L. Liu, C. Oestges, J. Poutanen, K. Haneda, P. Vainikainen, F. Quitin, F. Tufvesson, and P. Doncker. The COST 2100 MIMO channel model. IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, 19(6):92--99, Dec. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. R. Parviainen, J. Ylitalo, J-P.Nuutinen, P. Talmola, J. Henriksson, H. Himmanen, R. Ekman, and E. Huuhka. Experimental investigations on MIMO radio channel characteristics on UHF band. In Proc. IEEE ICC, Dresden, Germany, Jun. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. V. Pham and J.-Y. Chouinard. A study on the channel and signal cross correlation of UHF DTV channels. In Proc. IEEE ISSSE, Montreal, Canada, Jul. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. J. Poutanen, K. Haneda, L. Lingfeng, C. Oestges, F. Tufvesson, and P. Vainikainen. Parameterization of the COST 2100 MIMO channel model in indoor scenarios. In Proc. EurAAP EuCAP, Rome, Italy, Apr. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. T. Rappaport. Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice. Prentice Hall, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. H. Suzuki, D. Robertson, N. Ratnayake, and K. Ziri-Castro. Prediction and measurement of multiuser MIMO-OFDM channel in rural Australia. In Proc. IEEE VTC, Yokohama, Japan, May 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. D. Tse and P. Viswanath. Fundamentals of wireless communication. Cambridge University Press, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. J. Wallace, M. Jensen, L. Swindlehurst, and B. Jeffs. Experimental characterization of the MIMO wireless channel: Data acquisition and analysis. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2(2):335--343, Mar. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. B. Yarman. Design of ultra wideband power transfer networks. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. X. Ying, J. Zhang, L. Yan, G. Zhang, M. Chen, and R. Chandra. Exploring indoor white spaces in metropolises. In Proc. ACM MobiCom, Miami, FL, Sept. 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. T. Yoo and A. Goldsmith. On the optimality of multiantenna broadcast scheduling using zero-forcing beamforming. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(3):528--541, Mar. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. C. Zhong, M. McKay, T. Ratnarajah, and K. Wong. Distribution of the Demmel condition number of Wishart matrices. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 59(5):1309--1320, May 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. M. Zhu, G. Eriksson, and F. Tufvesson. The COST 2100 channel model: Parametrization and validation based on outdoor MIMO measurements at 300 MHz. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(2):888--897, Feb. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The case for UHF-band MU-MIMO

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MobiCom '14: Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
        September 2014
        650 pages
        ISBN:9781450327831
        DOI:10.1145/2639108

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 September 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        MobiCom '14 Paper Acceptance Rate36of220submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      ePub

      View this article in ePub.

      View ePub