ABSTRACT
Decision making in the field of policy making is a complex task. On the one hand conflicting objectives influence the availability of alternative solutions for a given problem. On the other hand economic, social, and environmental impacts of the chosen solution have to be considered. In the political context, these solutions are called policy options. To tackle societal problems a thorough analysis of policy options needs to be executed before a policy can be put into practice. Computational simulation is a method considered for measuring the impacts of policy options. However, due to their complexity, the underlying models and their output may be difficult to access by decision makers. In this work, we present a visual-interactive interface for an agent-based simulation model that enables decision makers to evaluate the impacts of alternative policy options in the field of regional energy planning. The decision maker can specify different subsidy strategies for supporting public photovoltaic installations as input and evaluate their impact on the actual adoption via the simulation output. We show the usability and usefulness of the visual interface in a real-world example evolved from the European research project ePolicy.
- S. Afzal, R. Maciejewski, and D. S. Ebert. Visual analytics decision support environment for epidemic modeling and response evaluation. In Proc. of VAST, pages 191--200. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Andrienko, N. Andrienko, S. Bremm, T. Schreck, T. von Landesberger, P. Bak, and D. Keim. Space-in-time and time-in-space self-organizing maps for exploring spatiotemporal patterns. In VGTC Conf. on Visualization, pages 913--922. Eurographics, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Bernard, T. Ruppert, M. Scherer, J. Kohlhammer, and T. Schreck. Content-based layouts for exploratory metadata search in scientific research data. In JCDL, pages 139--148, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Booshehrian, T. Möller, R. M. Peterman, and T. Munzner. Vismon: Facilitating analysis of trade-offs, uncertainty, and sensitivity in fisheries management decision making. CGF, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Bremm, T. von Landesberger, J. Bernard, and T. Schreck. Assisted descriptor selection based on visual comparative data analysis. In VGTC Conf. on Visualization, pages 891--900. Eurographics, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. J. Crouser and D. Kee. Two visualization tools for analyzing agent-based simulations in political science. IEEE Comp. Graph. and App., pages 67--77, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Few. Now You See it: Simple Visualization Techniques for Quantitative Analysis. Analytics Press, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Gavanelli, M. Milano, A. Holland, and B. O'Sullivan. What-if analysis through simulation-optimization hybrids. In K. G. Troitzsch, M. Möhring, and U. Lotzmann, editors, ECMS, 2012.Google Scholar
- G. N. Gilbert. Agent-based models. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage, 2008.Google Scholar
- D. Guo, M. Gahegan, A. M. MacEachren, and B. Zhou. Multivariate analysis and geovisualization with an integrated geographic knowledge discovery approach. Journal of CaGIS, 32(2):113--132, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, and A. Perl. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
- P. G. Johnson, T. Balke, and L. Kotthof. Integrating optimisation and agent-based modelling. In European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, 2014 (accepted for publication).Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. A. Keim, J. Kohlhammer, G. Ellis, and F. Mansmann. Mastering the Information Age - Solving Problems with Visual Analytics. EG, 2010.Google Scholar
- J. Kohlhammer, K. Nazemi, T. Ruppert, and D. Burkhardt. Toward visualization in policy modeling. Comp. Graph. and App., pages 84--89, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Kornhauser, U. Wilensky, and W. Rand. Design guidelines for agent based model visualization. J. of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(2), 2009.Google Scholar
- G. Pölzlbauer, M. Dittenbach, and A. Rauber. Advanced visualization of self-organizing maps with vector fields. Neural Netw., 19(6):911--922, July 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Ruppert, J. Bernard, and J. Kohlhammer. Bridging knowledge gaps in policy analysis with information visualization. In EGOV/ePart Ongoing Research, volume 221 of LNI, pages 92--103. GI, 2013.Google Scholar
- B. Shneiderman. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, pages 336--343, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Telea and J. J. van Wijk. Simplified representation of vector fields. In Proc. of the Conference on Visualization '99, pages 35--42. IEEE, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Unger and H. Schumann. Visual support for the understanding of simulation processes. In PacificVis, pages 57--64, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Visual access to an agent-based simulation model to support political decision making
Recommendations
Consensus-based decision support for multicriteria group decision making
Consensus decision making is complex and challenging in multicriteria group decision making due to the involvement of several decision makers, the presence of multiple, and often conflicting criteria, and the existence of subjectiveness and imprecision ...
The design of AHPEC in web-based decision support system for making decision
AIC'10/BEBI'10: Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS international conference on applied informatics and communications, and 3rd WSEAS international conference on Biomedical electronics and biomedical informaticsThis paper presents the architecture of the WDSS using AHPEC for making decision. The WDSS-AHPEC involves client, user interface, server, web server, database, and DSS model. The DSS model in this study is using AHPEC method. In applying AHPEC, it ...
Improving Decision Making by Means of a Marketing Decision Support System
Marketing decision makers are confronted with an increasing amount of information. This leads to a complex decision environment that may cause decision makers to lapse into using mental-effort-reducing heuristics such as anchoring and adjustment. In an ...
Comments