skip to main content
10.1145/2631775.2631808acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Online popularity and topical interests through the lens of instagram

Published:01 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online socio-technical systems can be studied as proxy of the real world to investigate human behavior and social interactions at scale. Here we focus on Instagram, a media-sharing online platform whose popularity has been rising up to gathering hundred millions users. Instagram exhibits a mixture of features including social structure, social tagging and media sharing. The network of social interactions among users models various dynamics including follower/followee relations and users' communication by means of posts/comments. Users can upload and tag media such as photos and pictures, and they can "like" and comment each piece of information on the platform. In this work we investigate three major aspects on our Instagram dataset: (i) the structural characteristics of its network of heterogeneous interactions, to unveil the emergence of self organization and topically-induced community structure; (ii) the dynamics of content production and consumption, to understand how global trends and popular users emerge; (iii) the behavior of users labeling media with tags, to determine how they devote their attention and to explore the variety of their topical interests.

Our analysis provides clues to understand human behavior dynamics on socio-technical systems, specifically users and content popularity, the mechanisms of users' interactions in online environments and how collective trends emerge from individuals' topical interests.

References

  1. J. Alstott, E. Bullmore, and D. Plenz. powerlaw: a python package for analysis of heavy-taileddistributions. PloS one, 9(1):e85777, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Aral, L. Muchnik, and A. Sundararajan. Distinguishing in uence-based contagion from homophily-driven di usion in dynamic networks. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(51):21544--21549, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Aral and D. Walker. Identifying in uential and susceptible members of social networks. Science, 337(6092):337--341, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and X. Lan. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 44--54, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A.-L. Barab--asi and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439):509--512, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. H. Becker, M. Naaman, and L. Gravano. Beyond trending topics: Real-world event identification on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. F. Benevenuto, T. Rodrigues, M. Cha, and V. A. F. Almeida. Characterizing user behavior in online social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pages 49--62, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10):P10008, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. R. M. Bond, C. J. Fariss, J. J. Jones, A. D. Kramer, C. Marlow, J. E. Settle, and J. H. Fowler. A 61-million-person experiment in social in uence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415):295--298, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. C. Budak, D. Agrawal, and A. El Abbadi. Structural trend analysis for online social networks. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 4(10):646--656, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Centola. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329:1194--1197, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Cha, A. Mislove, and K. P. Gummadi. A Measurement-driven Analysis of Information Propagation in the Flickr Social Network. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '09, pages 721--730, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. D. Conover, C. Davis, E. Ferrara, K. McKelvey, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. The geospatial characteristics of a social movement communication network. PloS one, 8:e55957, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. D. Conover, E. Ferrara, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. The digital evolution of occupy wall street. PloS one, 8(5):e64679, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. D. J. Crandall, L. Backstrom, D. Cosley, S. Suri, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52):22436--22441, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. D. J. Crandall, L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Mapping the world's photos. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, pages 761--770. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, R. West, D. Jurafsky, J. Leskovec, and C. Potts. No country for old members: user lifecycle and linguistic change in online communities. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, pages 307--318, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. De Meo, E. Ferrara, F. Abel, L. Aroyo, and G.-J. Houben. Analyzing user behavior across social sharing environments. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 5(1), 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. E. Ferrara. A large-scale community structure analysis in Facebook. EPJ Data Science, 1:1--30, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. E. Ferrara, O. Varol, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. Traveling trends: social butter ies or frequent iers' In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Online social networks, pages 213--222, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. P. A. Grabowicz, J. J. Ramasco, E. Moro, J. M. Pujol, and V. M. Eguiluz. Social features of online networks: The strength of intermediary ties in online social media. PloS one, 7(1):e29358, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. N. Hochman and L. Manovich. Zooming into an instagram city: Reading the local through social media. First Monday, 18(7), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. N. Hochman and R. Schwartz. Visualizing instagram: Tracing cultural visual rhythms. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Social Media Visualization (SocMedVis) in conjunction with The Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. H. Jeong, Z. N--eda, and A.-L. Barab--asi. Measuring preferential attachment in evolving networks. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 61(4):567, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J. Jiang, C. Wilson, X. Wang, P. Huang, W. Sha, Y. Dai, and B. Y. Zhao. Understanding latent interactions in online social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pages 369--382, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Lancichinetti, F. Radicchi, J. J. Ramasco, and S. Fortunato. Finding statistically significant communities in networks. PloS one, 6(4):e18961, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. D. Lazer, A. S. Pentland, L. Adamic, S. Aral, A. L. Barabasi, D. Brewer, N. Christakis, N. Contractor, J. Fowler, M. Gutmann, et al. Life in the network: the coming age of computational social science. Science, 323(5915):721, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. J. Lehmann, B. Gonçalves, J. J. Ramasco, and C. Cattuto. Dynamical classes of collective attention in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 251--260, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. K. Lerman and R. Ghosh. Information contagion: An empirical study of the spread of news on Digg and Twitter social networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pages 90--97, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, and J. Kleinberg. Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 497--506. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. N. Luhmann, J. Bednarz, D. Baecker, and E. M. Knodt. Social systems, volume 1. Stanford University Press Stanford, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. J. McAuley and J. Leskovec. From amateurs to connoisseurs: modeling the evolution of user expertise through online reviews. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, pages 897--908. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. A. Mislove, H. S. Koppula, K. P. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Growth of the Flickr Social Network. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Online Social Networks, WOSN '08, pages 25--30, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. A. Mislove, S. Lehmann, Y.-Y. Ahn, J.-P. Onnela, and J. N. Rosenquist. Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. A. Mislove, M. Marcon, P. K. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pages 29--42, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. D. Quercia, L. Capra, and J. Crowcroft. The social world of Twitter: Topics, geography, and emotions. In Proceedings of the 6th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pages 298--305, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. T. Rattenbury, N. Good, and M. Naaman. Towards automatic extraction of event and place semantics from ickr tags. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 103--110. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. D. M. Romero, C. Tan, and J. Kleinberg. On the interplay between social and topical structure. In Proceedings of the 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. H. Sayyadi, M. Hurst, and A. Maykov. Event detection and tracking in social streams. In Proceedings of the 3rd International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. F. Schneider, A. Feldmann, B. Krishnamurthy, and W. Willinger. Understanding online social network usage from a network perspective. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pages 35--48, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. T. H. Silva, P. O. Vaz de Melo, J. M. Almeida, J. Salles, and A. A. Loureiro. A comparison of foursquare and instagram to the study of city dynamics and urban social behavior. In Proceedings of the 2nd SIGKDD International Workshop on Urban Computing, page 4, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. H. A. Simon. On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42(3/4):425--440, 1955.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. M. Steinbach, G. Karypis, and V. Kumar. A comparison of document clustering techniques. In Proceedings of the KDD workshop on text mining, pages 525--526. Boston, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. A. Vespignani. Predicting the behavior of techno-social systems. Science, 325(5939):425, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. L. Weng, A. Flammini, A. Vespignani, and F. Menczer. Competition among memes in a world with limited attention. Scientific Reports, 2, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. L. Weng, F. Menczer, and Y.-Y. Ahn. Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Scientific Reports, 3:2522, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. L. Weng, F. Menczer, and Y.-Y. Ahn. Predicting successful memes using network and community structure. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2014), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. L. Weng, J. Ratkiewicz, N. Perra, B. Gonçalves, C. Castillo, F. Bonchi, R. Schifanella, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. The role of information diffusion in the evolution of social networks. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2013), pages 356--364, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. C. Wilson, B. Boe, A. Sala, K. P. N. Puttaswamy, and B. Y. Zhao. User interactions in social networks and their implications. In EuroSys, pages 205--218, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Y. Zhao and G. Karypis. Empirical and theoretical comparisons of selected criterion functions for document clustering. Machine Learning, 55(3):311--331, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Online popularity and topical interests through the lens of instagram

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HT '14: Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media
      September 2014
      346 pages
      ISBN:9781450329545
      DOI:10.1145/2631775

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 September 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      HT '14 Paper Acceptance Rate49of86submissions,57%Overall Acceptance Rate378of1,158submissions,33%

      Upcoming Conference

      HT '24
      35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
      September 10 - 13, 2024
      Poznan , Poland

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader