skip to main content
10.1145/2628257.2628267acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessing naturalness and emotional intensity: a perceptual study of animated facial motion

Published:08 August 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Animated characters appear in applications for entertainment, education, and therapy. When these characters display appropriate emotions for their context, they can be particularly effective. Characters can display emotions by accurately mimicking the facial expressions and vocal cues that people display or by damping or exaggerating the emotionality of the expressions. In this work, we explored which of these strategies would be most effective for animated characters. We investigated the effects of altering the auditory and facial levels of expressiveness on emotion recognition accuracy and ratings of perceived emotional intensity and naturalness. We ran an experiment with emotion (angry, happy, sad), auditory emotion level (low, high), and facial motion magnitude (damped, unaltered, exaggerated) as within-subjects factors. Participants evaluated animations of a character whose facial motion matched that of an actress we tracked using an active appearance model. This method of tracking and animation can capture subtle facial motions in real-time, a necessity for many interactive animated characters. We manipulated auditory emotion level by asking the actress to speak sentences at varying levels, and we manipulated facial motion magnitude by exaggerating and damping the actress's spatial motion. We found that the magnitude of auditory expressiveness was positively related to emotion recognition accuracy and ratings of emotional intensity. The magnitude of facial motion was positively related to ratings of emotional intensity but negatively related to ratings of naturalness.

References

  1. Ambadar, Z., Schooler, J. W., and Cohen, J. F. 2005. Deciphering the enigmatic face: The importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions. Psychological Science 16, 5, 403--410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bartneck, C., and Reichenbach, J. 2005. Subtle emotional expressions of synthetic characters. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62, 2, 179--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bassili, J. N. 1978. Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4, 3, 373--379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bassili, J. N. 1979. Emotion recognition: The role of facial movement and the relative importance of upper and lower areas of the face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 11, 2049--2058.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Beale, R., and Creed, C. 2009. Affective interaction: How emotional agents affect users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 9, 755--776. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Boker, S. M., Cohn, J. F., Theobald, B.-J., Matthews, I., Brick, T. R., and Spies, J. R. 2009. Effects of damping head movement and facial expression in dyadic conversation using real-time facial expression tracking and synthesized avatars. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364, 1535, 3485--3495.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bradley, M. M., Greenwald, M. K., Petry, M. C., and Lang, P. J. 1992. Remembering pictures: Pleasure and arousal in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18, 2, 379--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Calder, A. J., Young, A. W., Rowland, D., and Perrett, D. I. 1997. Computer-enhanced emotion in facial expressions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 264, 919--925.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Calder, A. J., Rowland, D., Young, A. W., Nimmo-Smith, I., Keane, J., and Perrett, D. I. 2000. Caricaturing facial expressions. Cognition 76, 2, 105--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cootes, T. F., Edwards, G. J., and Taylor, C. J. 2001. Active appearance models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 23, 6, 681--685. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cootes, T. F., Wheeler, G., Walker, K., and Taylor, C. J. 2002. View-based active appearance models. Image and Vision Computing 20, 9--10, 657--664.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Cunningham, D. W., and Wallraven, C. 2009. Dynamic information for the recognition of conversational expressions. Journal of Vision 9, 13, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. de Gelder, B., and Vroomen, J. 2000. The perception of emotions by ear and by eye. Cognition and Emotion 14, 3, 289--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. V. 1978. Facial Action Coding System: Investigator's Guide. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hess, U., Blairy, S., and Kleck, R. E. 1997. The intensity of emotional facial expressions and decoding accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 21, 4, 241--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hill, H. C., Troje, N. F., and Johnston, A. 2005. Rangeand domain-specific exaggeration of facial speech. Journal of Vision 5, 10, 793--807.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Hodgkinson, G. 2009. The seduction of realism. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2009 Educators Program, 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hyde, J., Carter, E. J., Kiesler, S., and Hodgins, J. K. 2013. Perceptual effects of damped and exaggerated facial motion in animated characters. In Proc. of IEEE Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition 2013, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., and Pelli, D. 2007. What's new in Psychtoolbox-3? In Perception, vol. 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lasseter, J. 1987. Principles of traditional animation applied to 3D computer animation. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 1987, 35--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Massaro, D. W., and Egan, P. B. 1996. Perceiving affect from the voice and the face. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3, 2, 215--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Matthews, I., and Baker, S. 2004. Active appearance models revisited. International Journal of Computer Vision 60, 135--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Nass, C., and Moon, Y. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56, 1, 81--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Pollick, F. E., Hill, H., Calder, A., and Paterson, H. 2003. Recognising facial expression from spatially and temporally modified movements. Perception 32, 813--826.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Russell, J. A. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 6, 1161--1178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Theobald, B.-J., Matthews, I., Mangini, M., Spies, J. R., Brick, T. R., Cohn, J. F., and Boker, S. M. 2009. Mapping and manipulating facial expression. Language and Speech 52, 369--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Thomas, F., and Johnston, O. 1981. Disney Animation: The Illusion of Life. Abbeville Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tinwell, A., Grimshaw, M., Nabi, D. A., and Williams, A. 2011. Facial expression of emotion and perceptions of the Uncanny Valley in virtual characters. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 741--749. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wallbott, H. G., and Scherer, K. R. 1986. Cues and channels in emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 4, 690--699.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Watson, D., and Tellegan, A. 1985. Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin 98, 219--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Assessing naturalness and emotional intensity: a perceptual study of animated facial motion

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAP '14: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception
        August 2014
        137 pages
        ISBN:9781450330091
        DOI:10.1145/2628257

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 August 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate43of94submissions,46%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader