skip to main content
10.1145/2608628.2627488acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mathematics by machine

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

When David Hilbert started so called "Hilbert's program" (formalization of mathematics) in the early 20th century to give a solid foundation to mathematics, he unintentionally introduced the possibility of automatization of mathematics. Theoretically, the possibility was denied by Gödel's incompleteness theorem. However, an interesting issue remains: is "mundane mathematics" automatizable? We are developing a system that solves a wide range of math problems written in natural language, as a part of the Todai Robot Project, an AI challenge to pass the university entrance examination. We give an overview and report on the progress of our project, and the theoretical and methodological difficulties to be overcome.

References

  1. T. Arai. Mathematical Logic. Iwanami Shoten, 2011. (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Church. A note on the Entscheidungsproblem. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1:40--41, 1936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. G. E. Collins. Quantifier elimination for real closed fields by cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In Automata Theory and Formal Languages 2nd GI Conference Kaiserslautern, volume 33 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 134--183. Springer-Verlag, 1975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K. Gödel. Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik, 38(1):173--198, 1931.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. T. C. Hales. The Jordan curve theorem, formally and informally. The American Mathematical Monthly, 114(10):882--894, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. H. Iwane, H. Yanami, H. Anai, and K. Yokoyama. An effective implementation of symbolic-numeric cylindrical algebraic decomposition for quantifier elimination. Theoretical Computer Science, 479:43--69, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. Matsuzaki, H. Iwane, H. Anai, and N. Arai. The complexity of math problems -- linguistic, or computational? In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 73--81, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Matsuzaki, H. Iwane, H. Anai, and N. H. Arai. The most uncreative examinee: a first step toward wide coverage natural language math problem solving. In Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2014. (to appear).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Robinson. Definability and decision problems in arithmetic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 14(2):98--114, 1949.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. Steedman. The Syntactic Process. Bradford Books. Mit Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. W. Strzeboński. Cylindrical algebraic decomposition using validated numerics. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 41(9):1021--1038, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Tarski. A Decision Method for Elementary Algebra and Geometry. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Turing. On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 42:230--265, 1936.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. N. Whitehead and B. A. W. Russell. Principia Mathematica. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1910, 1912, and 1913.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L. Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations/Philosophische Untersuchungen. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Mathematics by machine

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              ISSAC '14: Proceedings of the 39th International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation
              July 2014
              444 pages
              ISBN:9781450325011
              DOI:10.1145/2608628

              Copyright © 2014 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 23 July 2014

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              ISSAC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate51of96submissions,53%Overall Acceptance Rate395of838submissions,47%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader