Anneke Zuiderwijk
Marijn Janssen
ABSTRACT
Reports and research appears to assume that the benefits of open data dominate open data's negative consequences. Moreover, much of the existing research discusses benefits and disadvantages on a high level without providing much detailed insight in the underlying processes. Yet many governments are reluctant to open their data, as they are afraid of possible negative consequences of opening data. The objective of this policy paper is to better understand the aspects of the dark side of open data and contributes to the literature by providing a more realistic perspective on open data. We conducted nineteen in depth interviews with public sector officials and data archivists and identified sixteen categories of negative effects. For the dark side inherent to open data efforts the research suggests that a context and dataset dependent decision-making model needs to be made weighing the benefits of open data on the one hand (e.g. creating transparency, the possibility to strengthen economic growth), and the risks and disadvantages of open data (e.g. violating privacy and possible misuse and misinterpretation of data) on the other hand.
- European_Commission. (2003, December 12). Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/rules/eu/index_en.htm.Google Scholar
- K. Janssen, "The Influence of the PSI Directive on Open Government Data: An Overview of Recent Developments," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, pp. 446--456, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. McDermott, "Building Open Government," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, pp. 401--413, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Barry and F. Bannister, "Barriers to Open Data Release: A View from the Top," presented at the 2013 EGPA Annual Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, 2013.Google Scholar
- P. Conradie and S. Choenni, "Exploring process barriers to release public sector information in local government," presented at the 6th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (ICEGOV), Albany, New York, United States of America, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Janssen, "Legal interoperability -- barriers to the harmonization of licences " presented at the ICRI - Share PSI workshop, Brussels, 2011.Google Scholar
- T. Jetzek, M. Avital, and N. Bjorn-Andersen, "Data-Driven Innovation through Open Government Data," Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 9, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. C. Bertot, P. McDermott, and T. Smith, "Measurement of Open Government: Metrics and Process," presented at the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, U.S.A., 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- European_Commission, "Riding the wave: how Europe can gain form the rising tide of scientific data," Brussels2010.Google Scholar
- B. Obama. (2009, September 15). Open Government Directive. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-06.pdfGoogle Scholar
- B. Obama. (2012, September 15). Digital Government. Building a 21st Century Platform to Better Serve the American People. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/egov/digital-government/digital-government.htmlGoogle Scholar
- European_Commission. (2013, January 14). EU implementation of the G8 Open Data Charter. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=3489Google Scholar
- M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk, "Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government," Information Systems Management, vol. 29, pp. 258--268, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Charalabidis, E. Ntanos, and F. Lampathaki, "An architectural framework for open governmental data for researchers and citizens," in Electronic government and electronic participation joint proceedings of ongoing research and projects of IFIP EGOV and ePart 2011, M. Janssen, A. Macintosh, J. Scholl, E. Tambouris, M. Wimmer, H. d. Bruijn, et al., Eds., ed Delft 2011, pp. 77--85.Google Scholar
- J. C. Bertot, P. T. Jaeger, and J. M. Grimes, "Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: E-government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-Corruption Tools for Societies," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, pp. 264--271, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. T. Borzacchiello and M. Craglia, "The impact on innovation of open access to spatial environmental information: A research strategy," International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 60, pp. 114--129, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Davies, F. Perini, and J. M. Alonso. (2013, February 24). Researching the emerging impacts of open data. ODDC conceptual framework. Available: http://www.opendataresearch.org/sites/default/files/posts/Researching%20the%20emerging%20impacts%20of%20open%20data.pdfGoogle Scholar
- F. Bannister and R. Connolly, "The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e-Government," Policy & Internet, vol. 3, p. Article 8, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Strathern, "The Tyranny of Transparency," British Educational Research Journal, vol. 26, pp. 309--321, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Gurstein, "Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone?," First Monday, vol. 16, 2011.Google Scholar
- A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen, "Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A comparison framework," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31, pp. 17--29, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. United States of America: Sociology Press, 1967.Google Scholar
- S. Nieuwenhuijs. (2014, February 3). Het opvallendste nieuws volgens Sandor Nieuwenhuijs Available: http://www.automatiseringgids.nl/nieuws/2014/05/het-opvallendste-nieuws-volgens-sandor-nieuwenhuijsGoogle Scholar
- C. Böhm, M. Freitag, A. Heise, C. Lehmann, A. Mascher, F. Naumann, et al., "GovWILD: Integrating Open Government Data for Transparency," WWW, vol. (Companion Volume), pp. 321--324, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Delone and E. McLean, "Information Systems Succes: the quest for the dependent variable," Information Systems Research, vol. 3, pp. pp.60--95, 1992.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. W. Lee, D. M. Strong, B. K. Kahn, and R. Y. Wang, "AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment," Information and Management, vol. 40, pp. 133--146, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. R. Scott, Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.Google Scholar
- J. E. Fountain, Building the virtual state. Information technology and institutional change. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. F. Luna-Reyes and J. R. Gil-Garcia, "Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-Government phenomena," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, pp. 329--345, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- The negative effects of open government data - investigating the dark side of open data
Recommendations
Open government and data intermediaries: the case of AidData
dg.o '14: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government ResearchOpen Government initiatives can improve transparency, participation, and collaboration between citizens and government agencies. Increasingly a data intermediary is an important actor in this relationship. Helping state agencies as open data producers, ...
Open Government Data Policy and Indian Ecosystems
ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceIn a developing country like India, with complex issues at hand evidence-based Planning of socio-economic development processes must rely on quality data. As quality data is not easily accessible, there is a general need to facilitate sharing and ...
Open data policy-making: A review of the state-of-the-art and an emerging research agenda
Selection of Open Data Policy-making Papers from DG.O. 2018This section presents a selection of papers on open data policy-making from the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research 2018 (dg.o 2018). To position the research discussed in this section meaningfully, our introductory ...
Comments