ABSTRACT
Smart disclosure constitutes a form of open data policy that has the objective of promoting more sustainable economies and innovation by providing consumers with information to help them make better purchasing decisions. Trust in the information regarding product and certification is crucial for the adoption and usage of smart disclosure tools that make use of such information. In this paper, we investigate the determinants of trust in sustainable product information through a survey administered in Mexico and the United States. Our results suggest that brands and certificates reputation are important components to develop trust. Our results also suggest that additional information to verify label does not emerge as significant predictor to induce trust. We argue that to be useful, such information should be aggregated and presented to consumers in a simple way right at their fingertips. Finally, we found that support from government agencies and endorsement from non-for-profit organizations significantly influence consumer's trusting beliefs on sustainable practices information.
- Ba, S. Establishing online trust through a community responsibility system. Decision Support Systems 31, 3 (2001), 323--336. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bator, F. M. The Anatomy of Market Failure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 72, 3 (1958), 351--379.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beldad, A., de Jong, M., and Steehouder, M. How shall I trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 5 (2010), 857--869. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bigley, G. A. and Pearce, J. L. Straining for Shared Meaning in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust. Academy of Management Review 23, 3 (1998), 405--421.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bizer, C., Heath, T., and Berners-Lee, T. Linked Data - The Story So Far: International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5, 3 (2009), 1--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Büttner, O. B. and Göritz, A. S. Perceived trustworthiness of online shops. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 7, 1 (2008), 35--50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Castaldo, S. Trust in Market Relationships. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cobb, J. Smart Disclosure: Innovation in Personal Data. Spruce Advisers, 2012. http://www.spruceadvisers.com/smart-disclosure-innovation-in-personal-data/.Google Scholar
- Coffee Jr, J. C. Market failure and the economic case for a mandatory disclosure system. Virginia Law Review, (1984), 717--753.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Collins, C. M., Steg, L., and Koning, M. A. S. Customers' values, beliefs on sustainable corporate performance, and buying behavior. Psychology and Marketing 24, 6 (2007), 555--577.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cummings, L. L. and Bromiley, P. The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and Validation. In R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler, eds., Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. SAGE Publications, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gefen, D., Benbasat, I., and Pavlou, P. A Research Agenda for Trust in Online Environments. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 4 (2008), 275--286. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W. Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Q. 27, 1 (2003), 51--90. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gefen, D. E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega 28, 6 (2000), 725--737.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., and Cronin Jr., J. J. Against the Green: A Multi-method Examination of the Barriers to Green Consumption. Journal of Retailing 89, 1 (2013), 44--61.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grabner-Kräuter, S. and Kaluscha, E. A. Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58, 6 (2003), 783--812. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Howard, A. What is smart disclosure? O'Reilly Radar, 2012. http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/04/what-is-smart-disclosure.html.Google Scholar
- Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., and Saarinen, L. Consumer Trust in an Internet Store: A Cross-Cultural Validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5, 2 (1999), 0--0.Google Scholar
- Jiang, P., Jones, D. B., and Javie, S. How third-party certification programs relate to consumer trust in online transactions: An exploratory study. Psychology and Marketing 25, 9 (2008), 839--858.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., and Boyd, C. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems 43, 2 (2007), 618--644. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, K. and Kim, J. Third-party Privacy Certification as an Online Advertising Strategy: An Investigation of the Factors Affecting the Relationship between Third-party Certification and Initial Trust. Journal of Interactive Marketing 25, 3 (2011), 145--158.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kimery, K. and McCord, M. Third Party Assurances: Mapping the Road to Trust in eRetailing. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA) 4, 2 (2002).Google Scholar
- Leftwich, R. Market failure fallacies and accounting information. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2, 3 (1980), 193--211.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lewicki, R. J. and Bunker, B. B. Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. In B. B. Bunker and J. Z. Rubin, eds., Conflict, cooperation, and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, US, 1995, 133--173.Google Scholar
- Lewis, J. D. and Weigert, A. Trust as a social reality. Social forces 63, 4 (1985), 967--985.Google Scholar
- Li, X., Hess, T. J., and Valacich, J. S. Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17, 1 (2008), 39--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Locke, R., Kochan, T., Romis, M., and Qin, F. Beyond corporate codes of conduct: Work organization and labour standards at Nike's suppliers. International Labour Review 146, 1--2 (2007), 21--40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Locke, R. and M. Romis. Improving Work Conditions in a Global Supply Chain. MIT Sloan Management Review 48, 2 (2007), 54--61.Google Scholar
- Luna-Reyes, L., Zhang, J., Whitmore, A., et al. Full Information Product Pricing: An Information Strategy for Harnessing Consumer Choice to Create a More Sustainable World. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 34, 1 (2014).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Luna-Reyes, L. F., Pardo, T. A., Sayogo, D. S., et al. Beyond Open Government: Ontologies and Data Architectures to Support Ethical Consumption. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ACM (2012), 1--4. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luna-Reyes, L. F., Zhang, J., Roy, R., Andersen, D. F., Whitmore, A., and Andersen, D. L. Information strategies to support full information product pricing: The role of trust. Information Polity 18, 1 (2013), 75--91. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marian, L. and Thøgersen, J. Direct and mediated impacts of product and process characteristics on consumers' choice of organic vs. conventional chicken. Food Quality and Preference 29, 2 (2013), 106--112.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D. An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review 20, 3 (1995), 709--734.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McKee, K. Sizing up the potential for a "smart" disclosure approach in base-of-pyramid market. 2012.Google Scholar
- McKnight, D. H. and Chervany, N. L. What Trust Means in E-Commerce Customer Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6, 2 (2002), 35--59. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology. 2002. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., and Chervany, N. L. Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships. Academy of Management Review 23, 3 (1998), 473--490.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michaelidou, N. and Hassan, L. M. Modeling the factors affecting rural consumers'#8482; purchase of organic and free-range produce: A case study of consumers'#8482; from the Island of Arran in Scotland, UK. Food Policy 35, 2 (2010), 130--139.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ng, K.-Y. and Chua, R. Y. J. Do I Contribute More When I Trust More? Differential Effects of Cognition- and Affect-Based Trust. Management and Organization Review 2, 1 (2006), 43--66.Google Scholar
- Opara, L. U. Traceability in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain: A Review of Basic Concepts, Technological Implications, and Future Prospects. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, December (2002).Google Scholar
- Park, C. W., Iyer, E. S., and Smith, D. C. The Effects of Situational Factors on In-Store Grocery Shopping Behavior: The Role of Store Environment and Time Available for Shopping. Journal of Consumer Research 15, 4 (1989), 422--433.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pavlou, P. A. Institution-based trust in interorganizational exchange relationships: the role of online B2B marketplaces on trust formation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11, 3--4 (2002), 215--243.Google ScholarCross Ref
- De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., and Rayp, G. Do Consumers Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair-Trade Coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs 39, 2 (2005), 363--385.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Porter, C. E. and Donthu, N. Cultivating Trust and Harvesting Value in Virtual Communities. Management Science 54, 1 (2008), 113--128. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Powell, W. W. Trust-based Forms of Governance. In R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler, eds., Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raynolds, L. T., Murray, D., and Heller, A. Regulating sustainability in the coffee sector: A comparative analysis of third-party environmental and social certification initiatives. Agriculture and Human Values 24, 2 (2007), 147--163.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., and Arinze, B. Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11, 3--4 (2002), 271--295.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., Camerer, C., and others. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of management review 23, 3 (1998), 393--404.Google Scholar
- Rousseau, D. M. Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 19, 3 (1998), 217--233.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sarker, S., Valacich, J. S., and Sarker, S. Virtual Team Trust: Instrument Development and Validation in an IS Educational Environment. In Information Resources Management Journal. IGI Global, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sheppard, B. H. and Sherman, D. M. The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General Implications. Academy of Management Review 23, (1998), 422--438.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simons, T. The High Cost of Lost Trust. Harvard Business Review September, (2002).Google Scholar
- Sinai, N., Irwin, C., Wollman, D., Makoui, Z., Blockowicz, B., and King, C. Introducing Green Button. 2012. http://www.demandresponsesmartgrid.org/Default.aspx?pageId=1214634.Google Scholar
- Sitkin, S. B. and Roth, N. L. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic "remedies" for trust/distrust. Organization Science 4, 3 (1993), 367--392.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sitkin, S. B., Stickel, D., Kramer, R. M., and Tyler, T. R. The Road to Hell: The Dynamics of Distrust in an Era of Quality. In Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sitkin, S. B. On the Positive Effect of Legalization on Trust. In Research on negotiation in organizations. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1995, 185--217.Google Scholar
- Sunstein, C. Informing Consumers through Smart Disclosure. White House, Washington D.C., 2011.Google Scholar
- Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale Univ Pr, 2008.Google Scholar
- Thaler, R. H. Smart Disclosure: The Regulatory Future. 2013. http://leeds.colorado.edu/event/bouldersummerconference#2012conference.Google Scholar
- Thøgersen, J. and Schrader, U. From Knowledge to Action---New Paths Towards Sustainable Consumption. Journal of Consumer Policy 35, 1 (2012), 1--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vance, A., Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C., and Straub, D. W. Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 4 (2008), 73--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, W. and Benbasat, I. Attributions of Trust in Decision Support Technologies: A Study of Recommendation Agents for E-Commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 4 (2008), 249--273. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Watson, C., McCarthy, J., and Rowley, J. Consumer attitudes towards mobile marketing in the smart phone era. International Journal of Information Management 33, 5 (2013), 840--849.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Willis, L. Which Consumer Financial Education Programs Are Most Effective?: Assuming a Fact Not in Evidence - Credit Slips. 2013.Google Scholar
- Wilson, T. P. and Clarke, W. R. Food safety and traceability in the agricultural supply chain: using the Internet to deliver traceability. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 3, 3 (1998), 127--133.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Examining trust as key drivers in smart disclosure for sustainable consumption: the case of I-choose
Recommendations
An investigation of the effect of online consumer trust on expectation, satisfaction, and post-expectation
This study proposes a framework regarding the relationship between consumer trust, satisfaction, expectation, and post-expectation in the context of electronic commerce. In particular, the framework draws together from three theories: social exchange ...
A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents
Are trust and risk important in consumers' electronic commerce purchasing decisions? What are the antecedents of trust and risk in this context? How do trust and risk affect an Internet consumer's purchasing decision? To answer these questions, we i) ...
A study of the effect of consumer trust on consumer expectations and satisfaction: the Korean experience
ICEC '03: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Electronic commerceThis study proposes a framework regarding the relationship between consumer trust, satisfaction, and expectation in the context of electronic commerce. In particular, the framework draws together two theories: expectation-confirmation theory and social ...
Comments