skip to main content
10.1145/2612733.2612747acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Examining trust as key drivers in smart disclosure for sustainable consumption: the case of I-choose

Published:18 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smart disclosure constitutes a form of open data policy that has the objective of promoting more sustainable economies and innovation by providing consumers with information to help them make better purchasing decisions. Trust in the information regarding product and certification is crucial for the adoption and usage of smart disclosure tools that make use of such information. In this paper, we investigate the determinants of trust in sustainable product information through a survey administered in Mexico and the United States. Our results suggest that brands and certificates reputation are important components to develop trust. Our results also suggest that additional information to verify label does not emerge as significant predictor to induce trust. We argue that to be useful, such information should be aggregated and presented to consumers in a simple way right at their fingertips. Finally, we found that support from government agencies and endorsement from non-for-profit organizations significantly influence consumer's trusting beliefs on sustainable practices information.

References

  1. Ba, S. Establishing online trust through a community responsibility system. Decision Support Systems 31, 3 (2001), 323--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bator, F. M. The Anatomy of Market Failure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 72, 3 (1958), 351--379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Beldad, A., de Jong, M., and Steehouder, M. How shall I trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 5 (2010), 857--869. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bigley, G. A. and Pearce, J. L. Straining for Shared Meaning in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust. Academy of Management Review 23, 3 (1998), 405--421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bizer, C., Heath, T., and Berners-Lee, T. Linked Data - The Story So Far: International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5, 3 (2009), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Büttner, O. B. and Göritz, A. S. Perceived trustworthiness of online shops. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 7, 1 (2008), 35--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Castaldo, S. Trust in Market Relationships. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cobb, J. Smart Disclosure: Innovation in Personal Data. Spruce Advisers, 2012. http://www.spruceadvisers.com/smart-disclosure-innovation-in-personal-data/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Coffee Jr, J. C. Market failure and the economic case for a mandatory disclosure system. Virginia Law Review, (1984), 717--753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Collins, C. M., Steg, L., and Koning, M. A. S. Customers' values, beliefs on sustainable corporate performance, and buying behavior. Psychology and Marketing 24, 6 (2007), 555--577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Cummings, L. L. and Bromiley, P. The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and Validation. In R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler, eds., Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. SAGE Publications, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gefen, D., Benbasat, I., and Pavlou, P. A Research Agenda for Trust in Online Environments. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 4 (2008), 275--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W. Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Q. 27, 1 (2003), 51--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gefen, D. E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega 28, 6 (2000), 725--737.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., and Cronin Jr., J. J. Against the Green: A Multi-method Examination of the Barriers to Green Consumption. Journal of Retailing 89, 1 (2013), 44--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Grabner-Kräuter, S. and Kaluscha, E. A. Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58, 6 (2003), 783--812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Howard, A. What is smart disclosure? O'Reilly Radar, 2012. http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/04/what-is-smart-disclosure.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., and Saarinen, L. Consumer Trust in an Internet Store: A Cross-Cultural Validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5, 2 (1999), 0--0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang, P., Jones, D. B., and Javie, S. How third-party certification programs relate to consumer trust in online transactions: An exploratory study. Psychology and Marketing 25, 9 (2008), 839--858.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., and Boyd, C. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems 43, 2 (2007), 618--644. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kim, K. and Kim, J. Third-party Privacy Certification as an Online Advertising Strategy: An Investigation of the Factors Affecting the Relationship between Third-party Certification and Initial Trust. Journal of Interactive Marketing 25, 3 (2011), 145--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kimery, K. and McCord, M. Third Party Assurances: Mapping the Road to Trust in eRetailing. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA) 4, 2 (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Leftwich, R. Market failure fallacies and accounting information. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2, 3 (1980), 193--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Lewicki, R. J. and Bunker, B. B. Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. In B. B. Bunker and J. Z. Rubin, eds., Conflict, cooperation, and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, US, 1995, 133--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Lewis, J. D. and Weigert, A. Trust as a social reality. Social forces 63, 4 (1985), 967--985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Li, X., Hess, T. J., and Valacich, J. S. Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17, 1 (2008), 39--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Locke, R., Kochan, T., Romis, M., and Qin, F. Beyond corporate codes of conduct: Work organization and labour standards at Nike's suppliers. International Labour Review 146, 1--2 (2007), 21--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Locke, R. and M. Romis. Improving Work Conditions in a Global Supply Chain. MIT Sloan Management Review 48, 2 (2007), 54--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Luna-Reyes, L., Zhang, J., Whitmore, A., et al. Full Information Product Pricing: An Information Strategy for Harnessing Consumer Choice to Create a More Sustainable World. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 34, 1 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Luna-Reyes, L. F., Pardo, T. A., Sayogo, D. S., et al. Beyond Open Government: Ontologies and Data Architectures to Support Ethical Consumption. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ACM (2012), 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Luna-Reyes, L. F., Zhang, J., Roy, R., Andersen, D. F., Whitmore, A., and Andersen, D. L. Information strategies to support full information product pricing: The role of trust. Information Polity 18, 1 (2013), 75--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Marian, L. and Thøgersen, J. Direct and mediated impacts of product and process characteristics on consumers' choice of organic vs. conventional chicken. Food Quality and Preference 29, 2 (2013), 106--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D. An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review 20, 3 (1995), 709--734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. McKee, K. Sizing up the potential for a "smart" disclosure approach in base-of-pyramid market. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. McKnight, D. H. and Chervany, N. L. What Trust Means in E-Commerce Customer Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6, 2 (2002), 35--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology. 2002. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., and Chervany, N. L. Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships. Academy of Management Review 23, 3 (1998), 473--490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Michaelidou, N. and Hassan, L. M. Modeling the factors affecting rural consumers'#8482; purchase of organic and free-range produce: A case study of consumers'#8482; from the Island of Arran in Scotland, UK. Food Policy 35, 2 (2010), 130--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Ng, K.-Y. and Chua, R. Y. J. Do I Contribute More When I Trust More? Differential Effects of Cognition- and Affect-Based Trust. Management and Organization Review 2, 1 (2006), 43--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Opara, L. U. Traceability in Agriculture and Food Supply Chain: A Review of Basic Concepts, Technological Implications, and Future Prospects. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, December (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Park, C. W., Iyer, E. S., and Smith, D. C. The Effects of Situational Factors on In-Store Grocery Shopping Behavior: The Role of Store Environment and Time Available for Shopping. Journal of Consumer Research 15, 4 (1989), 422--433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Pavlou, P. A. Institution-based trust in interorganizational exchange relationships: the role of online B2B marketplaces on trust formation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11, 3--4 (2002), 215--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., and Rayp, G. Do Consumers Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair-Trade Coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs 39, 2 (2005), 363--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Porter, C. E. and Donthu, N. Cultivating Trust and Harvesting Value in Virtual Communities. Management Science 54, 1 (2008), 113--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Powell, W. W. Trust-based Forms of Governance. In R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler, eds., Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Raynolds, L. T., Murray, D., and Heller, A. Regulating sustainability in the coffee sector: A comparative analysis of third-party environmental and social certification initiatives. Agriculture and Human Values 24, 2 (2007), 147--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., and Arinze, B. Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11, 3--4 (2002), 271--295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., Camerer, C., and others. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of management review 23, 3 (1998), 393--404.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Rousseau, D. M. Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 19, 3 (1998), 217--233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Sarker, S., Valacich, J. S., and Sarker, S. Virtual Team Trust: Instrument Development and Validation in an IS Educational Environment. In Information Resources Management Journal. IGI Global, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Sheppard, B. H. and Sherman, D. M. The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General Implications. Academy of Management Review 23, (1998), 422--438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Simons, T. The High Cost of Lost Trust. Harvard Business Review September, (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Sinai, N., Irwin, C., Wollman, D., Makoui, Z., Blockowicz, B., and King, C. Introducing Green Button. 2012. http://www.demandresponsesmartgrid.org/Default.aspx?pageId=1214634.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Sitkin, S. B. and Roth, N. L. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic "remedies" for trust/distrust. Organization Science 4, 3 (1993), 367--392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Sitkin, S. B., Stickel, D., Kramer, R. M., and Tyler, T. R. The Road to Hell: The Dynamics of Distrust in an Era of Quality. In Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Sitkin, S. B. On the Positive Effect of Legalization on Trust. In Research on negotiation in organizations. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1995, 185--217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Sunstein, C. Informing Consumers through Smart Disclosure. White House, Washington D.C., 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale Univ Pr, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Thaler, R. H. Smart Disclosure: The Regulatory Future. 2013. http://leeds.colorado.edu/event/bouldersummerconference#2012conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Thøgersen, J. and Schrader, U. From Knowledge to Action---New Paths Towards Sustainable Consumption. Journal of Consumer Policy 35, 1 (2012), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Vance, A., Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C., and Straub, D. W. Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 4 (2008), 73--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Wang, W. and Benbasat, I. Attributions of Trust in Decision Support Technologies: A Study of Recommendation Agents for E-Commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 4 (2008), 249--273. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Watson, C., McCarthy, J., and Rowley, J. Consumer attitudes towards mobile marketing in the smart phone era. International Journal of Information Management 33, 5 (2013), 840--849.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Willis, L. Which Consumer Financial Education Programs Are Most Effective?: Assuming a Fact Not in Evidence - Credit Slips. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson, T. P. and Clarke, W. R. Food safety and traceability in the agricultural supply chain: using the Internet to deliver traceability. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 3, 3 (1998), 127--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Examining trust as key drivers in smart disclosure for sustainable consumption: the case of I-choose

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          dg.o '14: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
          June 2014
          365 pages
          ISBN:9781450329019
          DOI:10.1145/2612733

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 June 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          dg.o '14 Paper Acceptance Rate36of62submissions,58%Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader