Johanna Pirker
Maria Riffnaller-Schiefer
ABSTRACT
Attracting and engaging computer science students to enhance their mathematical and algorithmic thinking skills are challenging tasks. In winter 2013 we introduced a new teaching format for a course, which combines theory in computer science with hands-on algorithmic challenges, mathematical thinking activities, and collaborative problem-solving. Therefore, we introduced the pedagogical model Motivational Active Learning (MAL), which is grounded in MIT's successful format for teaching physics, Technology-Enabled Active Learning (TEAL), and combines it with motivational strategies usually used by game designers. Results from the initial setup in class reveals that students indeed assessed the course structure as more interactive and motivating compared to other similar courses. In this paper we discuss the course design, issues, and the impact, and analyze the first results in detail.
- Augustine, D.K., Gruber, K. D., & Hanson, L. R. (1989--1990). Cooperation works! Educational Leadership, 47Google Scholar
- Beichner, R.J. and Saul, J.M. 2003. Introduction to the SCALE-UP (Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs) Project. In Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi", Varenna, Italy.Google Scholar
- Deterding, S. and Khaled, R. 2011. Gamification: Toward a Definition. In CHI'11 Gamificatoin Workshop. ACMGoogle Scholar
- DiSessa, A. A. 2000. Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dori, Y.J. and Belcher, J. 2005. How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 14(2), 243--279.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dori, Y.J., Hult. E., Breslow, L., and Belcher, J.W. 2007. How much have they retained? Making Unseen Concepts Seen in a Freshman Electromagnetism Course at MIT. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(4), 299--323.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Freedman, R. A. 1996. Challenges in Teaching and Learning Introductory Physics. In From High Temperature Superconductivity to Microminiature Refrigeration (pp. 313--322).Google Scholar
- Gaffney, J.D.H., Richards, E., Kustusch, M.B., Ding, L., and Beichner, R.J. 2008. Scaling Up Education Reform. Journal of College Science Teaching (Mai/June), 18--23. http://www.ncsu.edu/per/Articles/JCST_SCALE-UP_article.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Hake, R. 1988. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66 (1), 64--74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnson, R.T., Johnson, D. W., and Stanne, M. B. 1986. Comparison Of Computer-Assisted Cooperative, Competitive, And Individualistic Learning. In American Education Research Journal, Vol. 23, No 3. 382--392.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kohl, P.B., and Kuo, H.V. 2012. Chronicling successful secondary implementation of Studio Physics. American Journal of Physics. Vol. 80(832), 832--839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4712305Google ScholarCross Ref
- MacKay, B., and College, C. 2006. Interative Engagement. (Science Education Resource Center at Carleton College) Retrieved 9 2012, 1, from http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/models/IntEng.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Mazur, E. 1996. Peer Interaction, A User's Manual. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- McConnell, J.J. 1996. Active learning and its use in Computer Science. Integrating technology into Computer Science Education, 6/96, Barcelona. 52--54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McGonigal, J. 2011. Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin Press HC. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Papasterigiou, M. 2009. Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education 52. 1--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Porter, L. and Simon. B. 2013. Retaining Nearly One-Time more Majors with a Trio of Instructional Best Practices in CS1. In SIGCSE'13 Proceedings, Denver, Colorado, Usa. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shantanu S. February 14, 2012. "Motivating Students and the Gamification of Learning". Huffington Post.Google Scholar
- Slavin, R. E. 1990. Cooperative learning. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Stuart, J. and Rutherford, R. 1978. Medical Student Concentration During Lectures. The Lancet, Vol. 2, (September), 514--516.Google ScholarCross Ref
- TEAL-Project. 2006. Retrieved 06 2012, 23, from Technology Enabled Active Learning: http://icampus.mit.edu/projects/TEAL.shtmlGoogle Scholar
- Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L. Blais, M., Briere, N., Senecal, C., and Vallieres, E. 1992. The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Educa-tion. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003--1017.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Motivational active learning: engaging university students in computer science education
Recommendations
Motivational active learning for computer science education (abstract only)
SIGCSE '14: Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science educationMotivational Active Learning (MAL) is an innovative pedagogical approach based on MIT's teaching format TEAL (Technology-Enabled Active Learning) combined with advanced motivational strategies based on gamification design aspects. The main idea of MAL ...
Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based learning in learning performance and intrinsic motivation
Although the proponents of game-based learning argue that educational games engage students and afford better learning outcomes, the impact of educational games on motivation and learning performance is still unclear. Research suggested that the ...
Towards a Conceptual Framework of GBL Design for Engagement and Learning of Curriculum-based Content
This paper aims to show best practices of GBL design for engagement. It intends to show how teachers can implement GBL in a collaborative, comprehensive and systematic way, in the classrooms, and probably outside the classrooms, based on empirical ...
Comments