skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557404acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

HaptiMoto: turn-by-turn haptic route guidance interface for motorcyclists

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

A national study by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau revealed that motorcyclist deaths were nearly thirty times more prevalent than that of drivers of other vehicles. These fatalities represent approximately 5% of all highway deaths each year, yet motorcycles account for only 2% of all registered vehicles in the USA. Motorcyclists are highly exposed on the road, so maintaining situational awareness at all times is crucial. Route guidance systems enable users to efficiently navigate between locations using dynamic visual maps and audio directions, and have been well tested with motorists, but remain unsafe for use by motorcyclists. Audio/visual routing systems decrease motorcyclists' situational awareness and vehicle control, and thus elevate chances of an accident. To enable motorcyclists to take advantage of route guidance while maintaining situational awareness, we created HaptiMoto, a wearable haptic route guidance system. HaptiMoto uses tactile signals to encode the distance and direction of approaching turns, thus avoiding interference with audio/visual awareness. Our evaluations demonstrate that HaptiMoto is both intuitive and a safer alternative for motorcyclists compared to existing solutions.

References

  1. Report on transportation accidents in australia. http://tinyurl.com/rgxcd, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. National highway traffic safety administration, traffic safety facts, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Arduino website. http://www.arduino.cc/, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bluesmirf product page. http://tinyurl.com/oghbno5, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Center for disease control and prevention (cdc), motorcycle crash-related data, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lilypad product page. http://tinyurl.com/k4oql7z, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Barfield, W., and Dingus, T. A. Human factors in intelligent transportation systems. Psychology Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Book, G. A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, C. H., and Gordon, M. S. Motorcycle helmet noise and active noise reduction. Open Acoustics Journal (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, J. L., Carney, C., and Kantowitz, B. H. Human factors design guidelines for advanced traveler information systems (atis) and commercial vehicle operations (cvo). Tech. rep., 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cao, Y., Van Der Sluis, F., Theune, M., Nijholt, A., et al. Evaluating informative auditory and tactile cues for in-vehicle information systems. Automotive UI (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Chang, W., Hwang, W., and Ji, Y. G. Haptic seat interfaces for driver information and warning systems. International Journal of HCI (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cummings, D., Lucchese, G., Prasad, M., Aikens, C., Ho, J., and Hammond, T. Haptic and ar interface for paratrooper coordination. CHINZ (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. de Vries, S. C., van Erp, J. B., and Kiefer, R. J. Direction coding using a tactile chair. Applied ergonomics (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dingus, T. A., and Hulse, M. C. Some human factors design issues and recommendations for automobile navigation information systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ege, E. S., Cetin, F., and Basdogan, C. Vibrotactile feedback in steering wheel reduces navigation errors during gps-guided car driving. WHC (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Elliott, L., van Erp, J., Redden, E., and Duistermaat, M. Field-based validation of a tactile navigation device. Haptics (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Elliott, L. R., Schmeisser, E. T., and Redden, E. S. Development of tactile and haptic systems for u.s. infantry navigation and communication. HI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Erp, J. B. F. V., Veen, H. A. H. C. V., Jansen, C., and Dobbins, T. Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 2, 2 (Apr. 2005), 106--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Fröhlich, P., Oulasvirta, A., Baldauf, M., and Nurminen, A. On the move, wirelessly connected to the world. Commun. ACM (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Gallace, A., Tan, H. Z., and Spence, C. The failure to detect tactile change: A tactile analogue of visual change blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gallace, A., Tan, H. Z., Spence, C., et al. Numerosity judgments for tactile stimuli distributed over the body surface. Perception (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gallace, A., Zeeden, S., Röder, B., and Spence, C. Lost in the move secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body. Consciousness and cognition (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Hart, S. G., and Staveland, L. E. Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Human mental workload (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hibberd, D. L., Jamson, S. L., and Carsten, O. M. J. Managing in-vehicle distractions: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ho, C., Tan, H. Z., and Spence, C. The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention. Ergonomics (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, L., and Higgins, C. A navigation aid for the blind using tactile-visual sensory substitution. EMBS (2006), 6289--6292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones, L. A., Nakamura, M., and Lockyer, B. Development of a tactile vest. HAPTICS (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jones, L. A., and Sarter, N. B. Tactile displays: Guidance for their design and application. HFES (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaaresoja, T., and Linjama, J. Perception of short tactile pulses generated by a vibration motor in a mobile phone. WHC (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Lin, M.-W., Cheng, Y.-M., Yu, W., and Sandnes, F. E. Investigation into the feasibility of using tactons to provide navigation cues in pedestrian situations. OZCHI (2008), 299--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Liu, Y.-C. Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems. Ergonomics (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Lunenfeld, H. Human factor considerations of motorist navigation and information systems. VNISC (1989).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Magnusson, C., Molina, M., Rassmus-Grohn, K., and Szymczak, D. Pointing for non-visual orientation and navigation. NordiCHI (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Magnusson, C., Rassmus-Grohn, K., and Szymczak, D. The influence of angle size in navigation applications using pointing gestures. HAID (2010), 107--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Magnusson, C., Rassmus-Grohn, K., and Szymczak, D. Scanning angles for directional pointing. MobileHCI (2010), 399--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Marek, M. A. Roadway design manual. Tech. rep., 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Parkes, A. M., Ashby, M. C., and Fairclough, S. H. The effects of different in-vehicle route information displays on driver behaviour. VNIS (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Pielot, M., and Boll, S. Tactile wayfinder: Comparison of tactile waypoint navigation with commercial pedestrian navigation systems. LNCS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Pielot, M., Henze, N., and Boll, S. Supporting map-based wayfinding with tactile cues. MobileHCI (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Pielot, M., Poppinga, B., Heuten, W., and Boll, S. 6th senses for everyone!: the value of multimodal feedback in handheld navigation aids. ICMI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Pielot, M., Poppinga, B., Heuten, W., and Boll, S. A tactile compass for eyes-free pedestrian navigation. INTERACT (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Pielot, M., Poppinga, B., Heuten, W., and Boll, S. Pocketnavigator: studying tactile navigation systems in-situ. CHI (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Poppinga, B., Pielot, M., and Boll, S. Tacticycle: a tactile display for supporting tourists on a bicycle trip. In MobileHCI (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Prasad, M. A., Taele, P., Olubeko, A., and Hammond, T. A. Haptigo: A navigational "tap on the shoulder". HAPTICS (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Raisamo, R., Nukarinen, T., Pystynen, J., Makinen, E., and Kildal, J. Orientation inquiry: a new haptic interaction technique for non-visual pedestrian navigation. EuroHaptics (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Reid, G. B., and Nygren, T. E. The subjective workload assessment technique: A scaling procedure for measuring mental workload. Human mental workload (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Robinson, S., Jones, M., Eslambolchilar, P., Murray-Smith, R., and Lindborg, M. 'i did it my way': moving away from the tyranny of turn-by-turn pedestrian navigation. MobileHCI (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Ross, D. A., and Blasch, B. B. Wearable interfaces for orientation and wayfinding. Assets (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Rumelin, S., Rukzio, E., and Hardy, R. Naviradar: a novel tactile information display for pedestrian navigation. UIST (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Salzer, Y., and Oron-Gilad, T. A comparison of 'on-thigh' vibrotactile, combined visual-vibrotactile, and visual-only alerting systems for the cockpit under visually demanding conditions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Salzer, Y., Oron-Gilad, T., and Ronen, A. Vibrotactor-belt on the thigh-directions in the vertical plane. Haptics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Shivakumara, B., and Sridhar, V. Study of vibration and its effect on health of the motorcycle rider. Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Srikulwong, M., and O'Neill, E. A comparison of two wearable tactile interfaces with a complementary display in two orientations. HAID (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Srinivasan, R., and Jovanis, P. P. Effect of selected in-vehicle route guidance systems on driver reaction times. HFES (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Steltenpohl, H., and Bouwer, A. Vibrobelt: tactile navigation support for cyclists. IUI (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Streeter, L. A., Vitello, D., and Wonsiewicz, S. A. How to tell people where to go: comparing navigational aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies (1985). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Szymczak, D., Rassmus-Grohn, K., Magnusson, C., and Hedvall, P.-O. A real-world study of an audio-tactile tourist guide. MobileHCI (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Tan, H. Z., Gray, R., Young, J. J., and Traylor, R. A haptic back display for attentional and directional cueing. Haptics-e (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Thorndyke, P. W., and Hayes-Roth, B. Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive psychology (1982).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. van Erp, J. B. Absolute localization of vibrotactile stimuli on the torso. Percept. Psychophys. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. van Erp, J. B., Kooi, F. L., Bronkhorst, A. W., van Leeuwen, D. L., van Esch, M. P., and van Wijngaarden, S. J. Multimodal interfaces: a framework based on modality appropriateness. vol. 50 of HFES (2006), 1542--1546.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. van Erp, J. B., and Van Veen, H. A. Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Wickens, C. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Williamson, J., Robinson, S., Stewart, C., Murray-Smith, R., Jones, M., and Brewster, S. Social gravity: a virtual elastic tether for casual, privacy-preserving pedestrian rendezvous. CHI (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. HaptiMoto: turn-by-turn haptic route guidance interface for motorcyclists

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader