skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557262acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In most online citizen science projects, a large proportion of participants contribute in small quantities. To investigate how low contributors differ from committed volunteers, we distributed a survey to members of the Old Weather project, followed by interviews with respondents selected according to a range of contribution levels. The studies reveal a complex relationship between motivations and contribution. Whilst high contributors were deeply engaged by social or competitive features, low contributors described a solitary experience of 'dabbling' in projects for short periods. Since the majority of participants exhibit this small-scale contribution pattern, there is great potential value in designing interfaces to tempt lone workers to complete 'just another page', or to lure early drop-outs back into participation. This includes breaking the work into components which can be tackled without a major commitment of time and effort, and providing feedback on the quality and value of these contributions.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., and Tighe, E. M. The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(5) (1994), 950.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Borst, W. A. M. Understanding Crowdsourcing: Effects of motivation and rewards on participation and performance in voluntary online activities (2010). hdl.handle.net/1765/1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowser, A., Hansen, D., and Preece, J. Gamifying Citizen Science: Lessons and Future Directions. Workshop on Designing Gamification: Creating Gameful and Playful Experiences (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3(2) (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Causer, T. and Wallace, V. Building A Volunteer Community: Results and Findings from Transcribe Bentham. Digital Humanities Quarterly 6(2) (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Crowston, K. and Fagnot, I. The motivational arc of massive virtual collaboration. Proc IFIP WG 9.5 Working Conference on Virtuality and Society: Massive Virtual Communities (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Crowston, K. and Prestopnik, N. R. Motivation and data quality in a citizen science game: A design science evaluation. Proc HICSS (2013), 450--459. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Haythornthwaite, C. Crowds and Communities: Light and Heavyweight Models of Peer Production. Proc HICSS (2009), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Iacovides, I., Jennett, C., Cornish-Trestrail, C., and Cox, A. L. Do games attract or sustain engagement in citizen science? a study of volunteer motivations. CHI Ext. Abstr. (2013), 1101--1106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lintott, C., Schawinski, K., Keel, W., et al. Galaxy Zoo: 'Hanny's Voorwerp', a quasar light echo? (2009). arxiv.org/abs/0906.5304.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Massung, E., Coyle, D., Cater, K. F., Jay, M., and Preist, C. Using crowdsourcing to support pro-environmental community activism. Proc CHI (2013), 371--380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S., and Crowston, K. The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6) (2012), 298--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nov, O., Arazy, O., and Anderson, D. Technology-Mediated Citizen Science Participation: A Motivational Model. Proc ICWSM (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nov, O., Arazy, O., and Anderson, D. Dusting for science: motivation and participation of digital citizen science volunteers. Proc iConference (2011), 68--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Prestopnik, N. R. and Crowston, K. Gaming for (Citizen) Science: Exploring Motivation and Data Quality in the Context of Crowdsourced Science through the Design and Evaluation of a Social-Computational System. Proc eScienceW (2011), 28--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Gay, P. L., et al. Galaxy Zoo: Exploring the Motivations of Citizen Science Volunteers. Astronomy Education Review 9(1) (2010), 010103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Gay, P. L., et al. Galaxy Zoo: Motivations of Citizen Scientists. arXiv preprint (2013) arXiv:1303.6886.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Raymond, E. S. The Cathedral and the Bazaar. First Monday 3(3) (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Reed, J., Raddick, M. J., Lardner, A., and Carney, K. An Exploratory Factor Analysis of Motivations for Participating in Zooniverse, a Collection of Virtual Citizen Science Projects. Proc HICSS (2013), 610--619. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Romeo, F. and Blaser, L. Bringing Citizen Scientists and Historians Together. Proc Museums and the Web (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., et al. Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. Proc CSCW (2012), 217--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wiggins, A. and Crowston, K. Developing a conceptual model of virtual organisations for citizen science. International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering 1(1) (2010), 148--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Zooniverse: Old Weather - Our Weather's Past, the Climate's Future. www.oldweather.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Zooniverse: Purpose. www.zooniverse.org/about.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader