skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557098acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reflects on the uses of prototypes in "Research through Design" and considers "Design Fiction" as a technique for exploring the potential value of new design work. It begins with an analysis of Research through Design abstracts in the ACM digital library and identifies an emerging language and structure of papers in this emerging field. The abstracts: frame a problem space, introduce a study, often involving the deployment of a prototype, and conclude with considerations, reflections and discussion. This format is then pastiched in a series of design fictions written for a project investigating new and emerging forms of reproduction in Art. The fictions take the form of "imaginary abstracts" which summarize findings of papers that have not been written about prototypes that do not exist. It is argued that framing concept designs as fictional studies can provide a space for research focused critique and development.

References

  1. Bakker, S., van den Hoven, E., and Eggen, B. (2013) FireFlies: physical peripheral interaction design for the everyday routine of primary school teachers. Proc. Of TEI '13. 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bardzell, J., and Bardzell, S. (2013). What is "critical" about critical design? Proc. of CHI'2013. ACM: New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bardzell, S., Gross, S., Wain, J., Toombs, A., and Bardzell, J., (2011). The significant screwdriver: care, domestic masculinity, and interaction design. In Proc. of (BCSHCI '11). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bleecker, J.( 2009). "Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction". http://drbfw5wfjlxon.cloudfront.net/writing/DesignFiction_WebEdition.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Blythe, M. (2013) The Hitch Hiker's Guide to Ubikomp: using techniques from literary and critical theory to reframe scientific agendas. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 2013 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Blythe, M., Briggs, J., Olivier, P. and Hook, J., 'Digital originals: reproduction as a space for design.' In Procs. of NordiCHI '12, ACM Press (2012), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Blythe, M., and Dearden, A., (2009) Representing older people: towards meaningful images of the user in design scenarios. Universal Access in the Information Society. Vol. 8, Issue1 (2009), Page 21--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Blythe M., and Wright P., (2006) Pastiche Scenarios: Fiction as a Resource for Experience Centred Design. Interacting with Computers. Volume 18, Issue 5 , September 2006, Pages 1139--1164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Boucher, A., Cameron, D., and Jarvis, N. (2012) Power to the people: dynamic energy management through communal cooperation. In Proc. Of DIS '12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 612--620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Branigan, E., (1992) Narrative Comprehension and Film, Routledge, London and New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Briggs, J. and Blythe ,M., 'Apps for art's sake: resistance and innovation'. In Procs. of Mobile HCI '13, ACM Press (2013), 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Briggs, P., Blythe, M., Vines, J., Lindsay, S., Dunphy, P., Nicholson, J., Green, D., Kitson, J., Monk, A., Olivier, P. (2012) Invisible Design: Exploring Insights and Ideas through Ambiguous Film Scenarios. In: DIS 2012, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 11-15 July. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Budd, J. M.. The Stapel Case: An Object Lesson in Research Integrity and Its Lapses. Synesis A Journal of Science, Technology, Ethics and Policy. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll, J. M. (1997) Scenario-based design. In: Helander, M., Landauer, T. K., and Prabhu, P., Editors, Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Carroll, J. M. (2000) Making Use: scenario based design of human-computer interactions. Cambridge. Mass MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Carroll, J. M. and Rosson, M. B. (2003) Usability Engineering: Scenario Based Development of Human Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufman. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Cooper, A. L. (1999) The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High-Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity. Sams. Indianapolis. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. DiSalvo, Carl. (2012) "Spectacles and Tropes: Speculative Design and Contemporary Food Cultures." Fibreculture: Special Issue on Networked Utopias and Speculative Futures, Issue 20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Dourish, P., and Bell, G., (2009) Resistance is Futile: Reading Science Fiction Alongside Ubiquitous Computing. http://www.dourish.com/publications/2009/scifi-pucdraft.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunne, T. and Raby, F. (2013) United Micro Kingdoms (UMK) Design Fiction. The Design Museum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse of Language. Pantheon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gayford, M. (2007) A Bigger Message: Conversations with David Hockney Thames and Hudson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaver, W. (2012) What Should We Expect from Research Through Design. CHI 2012 pp. 937--946. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Gerber, E. (2011). Tech break up: a research method for understanding people's attachment to their technology. In ProProc. Of (C&C '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Goldacre, B. (2012) Bad Pharma: How drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients. Fourth Estate. London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Gonzattoa, R. F., van Amstela, F., Merkleb, L. and Hartmann, T., (2013) The Ideology of the Future in Design Fictions. Digital Creativity vol. 24 no. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hales, D. Design Fictions an Introduction and Partial Taxonomy. Digital Creativity. Vol. 24, Issue 1. 2013. Special Issue: Design Fictions 30 Apr 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hengeveld, B., Voort, R., Hummels, C., de Moor, J., van Balkom, H., Overbeeke, K., and van der Helm, A. ( 2008) The development of LinguaBytes. Adv. in Hum.-Comp. Int. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Hook, J., Briggs, J., Blythe, M., Walsh, N. and Olivier, P., 'Repentir: digital exploration beneath the surface of an oil painting.' In Extended Abstracts of CHI '13, ACM Press (2013), 2947--2950. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Johnson, B. 2011. Science Fiction for Prototyping: Designing the Future with Science Fiction. San Francisco: Morgan and Claypool.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirman, B,. Linehan, C., Lawson, S. and O'Hara, D., (2013) CHI and the future Robot Enslavement of Mankind: A Retrospective. AltCHI CHI 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Kim, Y. K., Row, Y. K., and Nam, T. J. (2012). Knoby: pet-like interactive door knob. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1685--1690. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lem, S. (1973) Imaginary Magnitude. A Harvester book. New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Li, F., Blythe, M., Briggs, J., Hook, J. and Olivier, P., 'From "digital originals" to "unlimited editions": exploring new business models for digital art through case studies, research prototypes and design fictions.' 27th Annual British Academy of Management Conference, BAM2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Ludvigsen, M., and Veerasawmy, R. (2010). Designing technology for active spectator experiences at sporting events. In Proc. of OZCHI '10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 96--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Markussen, T., and Knutz, E., (2013) The Poetics of Design Fiction. Proc of DPPI 2013. Newcastle. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Microsoft Office Labs. (2012). Website. Available at http://www.microsoft.com/office/labs/index.html (accessed 9 May 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Morozov, E. (2013) To Save Everything Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don't Exist. Allen Lane Penguin Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Monk, A. F. (1998). Lightweight techniques to encourage innovative user interface design. In L. Wood (Ed.), User interface design: Bridging the gap from user requirements to design, Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 109--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Newell, A., Carmichael, A., Morgan, M., Dickinson, A. (2006) The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies. Interacting with Computers, 18, Elsevier Science, 996--1011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Nielsen, L. (2002) From user to character: An investigation into user descriptions in scenarios. In proceedings of designing Interactive Systems (DIS '02). ACM Press pp. 99--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Choi, H., Meier, S., and Park, A., (2012). Investigating the presence, form and behavior of virtual possessions in the context of a teen bedroom. In Proc. of (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 327--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ozenc, K. F., Brommer, J. P., Jeong, B.K., Shih, N., Au, K., and Zimmerman, J.. (2007). Reverse alarm clock: a research through design example of designing for the self. In Proc. of DPPI '07. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 392--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Park, S. Y. and Zimmerman, J. (2010). Investigating the opportunity for a smart activity bag. In proc. of CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2543--2552. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Pierce, J. and Paulos, E. (2013). Electric materialities and interactive technology. In Procs of CHI '13. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 119--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Schechner, R. (1988) Performance Theory. New York, London, Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Schön, D. A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 5(1), 3--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Seligman, M., (2011) Flourish. Nicholas Brealey Publishing. London Boston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Sterling, B. (2005) Shaping Things. MIT Press. Cambridge Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Sterling, B. (2009) Design Fictions. Interactions. Vol 16. Issue 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Sterling, B. 2013 Fantasy Prototypes and Real Disruption. Keynote NEXT Berlin 2013. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VIoRYPZk68Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Uriu, D., Namai, M., Tokuhisa, S., Kashiwagi, R., Inami, M., and Okude, N. (2012). panavi: recipe medium with a sensors-embedded pan for domestic users to master professional culinary arts. In Proc. of CHI '12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 129--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Vidyarthi, J. Riecke B. E, and Gromala D. (2012). Sonic Cradle: designing for an immersive experience of meditation by connecting respiration to music. In Proc. of DIS '12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 408--417 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Vines, J., Thieme, A., Comber, R., Blythe, M., Wright, P., and Olivier, P. (2013). HCI in the Press: Online Public Reactions to Mass Media Portrayals of HCI Research. CHI 2013 Paris, France. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Weiser, M. (1991). The Computer of the 21st Century. Scientific American Special Issue on Communication, Computers and Networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Wright, P. C. and McCarthy, J. C. (2004) The value of the novel in designing for experience. In A. Pirhonen, C. Roast, P. Saariluoma, H. Isom (eds.). Future Interaction Design. Springer, Amsterdam, 9--30, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Wyche, S., and Chetty, M. (2013). "I want to imagine how that place looks": designing technologies to support connectivity between Africans living abroad and home. In Proc. of CHI '13. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2755-2764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Zimmerman, J. & Forlizzi, J. (2008). The Role of Design Artifacts in Design Theory Construction. Human Computer Interaction Institute. Paper 37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader