Designing for the physical margins of digital workspaces: fidget widgets in support of productivity and creativity

ABSTRACT

We present our ongoing work to develop the concept of physical "margin" spaces around software and a new type of human computer interaction. Our novel "Fidget Widgets" seek to engage users' interrelated bodily motions, affective states, and cognitive functions to selectively enhance creativity, focus, calm, etc. Building playful interactions embodying "mindless" activities like doodling, fidgeting, and fiddling, we are working to demonstrate the value of incidental tangible interactions in the physical spaces surrounding digital workspaces. We intend these secondary interactions to have no intrinsic goals; rather these interactions extrinsically enhance a user's state toward the completion of their primary tasks.

References

1. Alonso, M. B. Relax! Inherent Feedback During Product Interaction to Reduce Stress. Delft University of Technology, 2010.
2. Andrade, J. What does doodling do? Applied Cognitive Psychology 24, 1 (2010), 100--106.
3. Ashby, F. G., Valentin, V. V., and Turken, A. U. The effects of positive affect and arousal on working memory and executive attention. ADVANCES IN CONSCIOUSNESS RESEARCH 44, (2002), 245--288.
4. Bounds, G. How Handwriting Boosts the Brain: Forming Letters Is Key to Learning, Memory, Ideas. Wall Street Journal Online. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704631504575531932754922518.html.
5. Bødker, S. When Second Wave HCI Meets Third Wave Challenges. NordiCHI '06: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles, (2006).
6. Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. C., and Yap, A. J. Power Posing: Brief Nonverbal Displays Affect Neuroendocrine Levels and Risk Tolerance. Psychological Science 21, 10 (2010), 1363--1368.
7. Christensen, T. C., Barrett, L. F., Bliss-Moreau, E., Lebo, K., and Kaschub, C. A practical guide to experience-sampling procedures. Journal of Happiness Studies 4, 1 (2003), 53--78.
8. Cloud, J. Better Learning Through Fidgeting. Time 173, 2009, 61.
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Larson, R. Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of nervous and mental disease 175, 9 (1987), 526--536.
10. Dourish, P. Where the Actions Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004.
11. Garger, S. Is there a link between learning style and neurophysiology. Educational Leadership 48, 2 (1990), 63--65.
12. Goldberg, J., Hagman, J., and Sazawal, V. Doodling our way to better authentication. CHI'02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2002).
13. Intille, S., Kukla, C., and Ma, X. Eliciting user preferences using image-based experience sampling and reflection. CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2002).
14. Isbister, K. and Höök, K. On being supple: in search of rigor without rigidity in meeting new design and evaluation challenges for HCI practitioners. CHI '09: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, (2009), 2233--2242.
15. Isbister, K., Karlesky, M., Frye, J., and Rao, R. Scoop!: a movement-based math game designed to reduce math anxiety. CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2012), 1075--1078.
16. Isbister, K., Schwekendiek, U., and Frye, J. Wriggle: An Exploration of Emotional and Social Effects of Movement. CHI'11: Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, (2011).
17. Isen, A. M. Positive affect as a source of human strength. In L. G. Aspinwall and U. M. Staudinger, eds., A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 2003, 179--195.
18. Karlesky, M. On Doodling: Software with Margins? notethesmile.org, 2011. http://notethesmile.org/blog/on-doodling-software-with-margins.html.
19. Karlesky, M. and Isbister, K. Fidget widgets: secondary playful interactions in support of primary serious tasks. CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2013), 1149--1154.
20. Karlesky, M., Melcer, E., and Isbister, K. Open sesame: re-envisioning the design of a gesture-based access control system. CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2013), 1167--1172.
21. Kruglanski, A. W. and Higgins, E. T. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. The Guilford, 2007.
22. Levin, G. and Yarin, P. Bringing sketching tools to keychain computers with an acceleration-based interface. CHI'99 Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, (1999), 268--269.
23. Mangen, A. and Velay, J.-L. Digitizing literacy: reflections on the haptics of writing. In M. H. Zadeh, ed., Advances in Haptics. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2010, 385--402.
24. Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., and Macrae, C. N. Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science 315, 5810 (2007), 393--395.
25. Matheson, K. Teachers ditch student desk chairs for yoga balls. Associated Press, 2013. http://news.yahoo.com/teachers-ditch-student-desk-chairs-152403408.html.
26. Mehta, R., Zhu, R. J., and Cheema, A. Is Noise Always Bad? Exploring the Effects of Ambient Noise on Creative Cognition. Journal of Consumer Research 39, 4 (2012), 784--799.
27. Niedenthal, P. M. Embodying Emotion. Science 316, 5827 (2007), 1002--1005.
28. Park, A. The Two Faces of Anxiety. Time Online, 2011. http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,2100106,00.html.
29. Philips. Mind Spheres. design.philips.com. http://www.design.philips.com/about/design/designportfolio/design_futures/mind_spheres.page.
30. Sae-Bae, N., Ahmed, K., Isbister, K., and Memon, N. Biometric-rich gestures: a novel approach to authentication on multi-touch devices. CHI '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2012), 977--986.
31. Saracho, O. N. and Spodek, B. A Historical Overview of Theories of Play. In O. N. Saracho and B. Spodek, eds., Multiple Perspectives on Play in Early Childhood Education. State University of New York Press, Albany, 1998, 1--10.
32. Schott, G. D. Doodling and the default network of the brain. The Lancet 378, 9797 (2011), 1133--1134.
33. Scollon, C. N., Kim-Prieto, C., and Diener, E. Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies 4, 1 (2003), 5--34.
34. Seo, M. G., Barrett, L. F., and Bartunek, J. M. The Role of Affective Experience in Work Motivation. Academy of Management Review 29, 3 (2004), 423--439.
35. Tobias, S. P. Wichita fifth-graders stand up for learning. The Wichita Eagle Online, 2012. http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/27/2582854/wichita-fifth-graders-can-stand.html.
36. Varenhorst, C. Passdoodles: A lightweight authentication method. Research Science Institute, (2004).
37. Wilson, F. The Hand: How Its Use Shapes the Brain, Language, and Human Culture. Vintage, New York, 1999.
38. Zhang, Y., Risen, J. L., and Hosey, C. Reversing One's Fortune by Pushing Away Bad Luck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, (2013).
39. Zhong, Y., Li, X., Fan, M., and Shi, Y. Doodle space: painting on a public display by cam-phone. Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on Ambient media computing, (2009), 13--20.
40. Writing better than typing for learning. NHS Choices, 2011. http://www.nhs.uk/news/2011/01January/Pages/writing-versus-typing-for-learning.aspx.
41. Coffitivity - Increase Your Creativity! coffitivity.com. http://coffitivity.com/.
42. Sifteo. sifteo.com. https://www.sifteo.com/.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing