skip to main content
10.1145/2535372.2535381acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Virtualizing the access network via open APIs

Published:09 December 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Residential broadband consumption is growing rapidly, increasing the gap between ISP costs and revenues. Meanwhile, proliferation of Internet-enabled devices is congesting access networks, frustrating end-users and content providers. We propose that ISPs virtualize access infrastructure, using open APIs supported through SDN, to enable dynamic and controlled sharing amongst user streams. Content providers can programmatically provision capacity to user devices to ensure quality of experience, users can match the degree of virtualization to their usage pattern, and ISPs can realize per-stream revenues by slicing their network resources. Using video streaming and bulk transfers as examples, we develop an architecture that specifies the interfaces between the ISP, content provider, and user. We propose an algorithm for optimally allocating network resources, leveraging bulk transfer time elasticity and access path space diversity. Simulations using real traces show that virtualization can reduce video degradation by over 50%, for little extra bulk transfer delay. Lastly, we prototype our system and validate it in a test-bed with real video streaming and file transfers. Our proposal is a first step towards the long-term goal of realizing open and agile access network service quality management that is acceptable to users, ISPs and content providers alike.

References

  1. HTTP Archive. http://www.httparchive.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Akhshabi, A. Begen, and C. Dovrolis. An experimental evaluation of rate-adaptation algorithms in adaptive streaming over http. In Proc. ACM MMSys, Feb. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group. Moving Toward Usage-Based Pricing. http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/clmw/Usage-Based-Pricing-Strategies.pdf, Mar. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Danphitsanuphan. Dynamic Bandwidth Shaping Algorithm for Internet Traffic Sharing Environments. In Proc. World Congress on Engineering, July 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. F. Dobrian, V. Sekar, A. Awan, I. Stoica, D. Joseph, A. Ganjam, J. Zhan, and H. Zhang. Understanding the Impact of Video Quality on User Engagement. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Aug. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Ghobadi, Y. Cheng, A. Jain, and M. Mathis. Trickle: Rate Limiting YouTube Video Streaming. In Proc. USENIX ATC, Jun 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Goma, M. Canini, A. Lopez Toledo, N. Laoutaris, D. Kostić, P. Rodriguez, R. Stanojević, and P. Yagüe Valentin. Insomnia in the Access or How to Curb Access Network Related Energy Consumption. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Aug. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R.L. Graham. Bounds on Multiprocessing Timing Anomalies. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 17(2):416--429, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Internet Society. Bandwidth Management: Internet Society Technology Roundtable Series. http://www.internetsociety.org/sites/default/files/BWroundtable_report-1.0.pdf, Nov 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Jakubczak, D.G. Andersen, M. Kaminsky, K. Papagiannaki, and S. Seshan. Link-alike: Using Wireless to Share Network Resources in a Neighborhood. ACM SIGMOBILE MC2R, 12(4):798--814, Oct 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. C. Joe-Wong, S. Ha, and M. Chiang. Time-dependent broadband pricing: feasibility and benefits. In Proc. IEEE ICDCS, June 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Krishnan and R. Sitaraman. Video Stream Quality Impacts Viewer Behavior: Inferring Causality Using Quasi-Experimental Designs. In Proc. ACM IMC, Nov. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Laoutaris, M. Sirivianos, X. Yang, and P. Rodriguez. Inter-Datacenter Bulk Transfers with NetStitcher. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Aug. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Light Reading. Comcast Turns Homes Into Hotspots. http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=703027, Jun. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. X. Liu, F. Dobrian, H. Milner, J. Jiang, V. Sekar, I. Stoica, and H. Zhang. A Case for a Coordinated Internet Video Control Plane. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Aug. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Mahimkar, A. Chiu, R. Doverspike, M.D. Feuer, P. Magill, E. Mavrogiorgis, J. Pastor, S.L. Woodward, and J. Yates. Bandwidth on Demand for Inter-Data Center Communication. In Proc. ACM HotNets Workshop, Nov. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Matias, E. Jacob, N. Katti, and J. Astorga. Towards Neutrality in Access Networks: A NANDO Deployment With OpenFlow. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Access Networks, June 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Mok, E. Chan, and R. Chang. Measuring the quality of experience of HTTP video streaming. In Proc. IFIP/IEEE Int'l Symp. on Integrated Network Management, May 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. K. Nahrstedt and J.M. Smith. The QoS Broker. IEEE Multimedia Magazine, 2(1):53--67, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. Nicosia, R. Klemann, K. Griffin, S. Taylor, B. Demuth, J. Defour, R. Medcalf, T. Renger, and P. Datta. Rethinking flat rate pricing for broadband services. White Paper, Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group, July 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Ramachandran. Web metrics: Size and number of resources. https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/web-metrics, May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. Rao, Y. Lim, C. Barakat, A. Legout, D. Towsley, and W. Dabbous. Network characteristics of video streaming traffic. In Proc. ACM CoNEXT, Dec. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. K. Rothermel, G. Dermler, and W. Fiederer. QoS Negotiation and Resource Reservation for Distributed Multimedia Applications. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, Canada, Jun 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sandvine-Intelligent Broadband Networks. Global Internet Phenomena Report. https://www.sandvine.com/trends/global-internet-phenomena/, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. H. Sugiyama. Programmable Network Systems Through the Junos SDK and Junos Space SDK. In World Telecommunications Congress, Mar. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Sundaresan, W. Donato, N. Feamster, R. Teixeira, S. Crawford, and A. Pescapè. Broadband Internet Performance: A View From the Gateway. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Aug 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Telefonica. BeWiFi. http://www.bewifi.es/, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. The European Telecom. Network Operators' Association. ITRs Proposal to Address New Internet Ecosystem. http://www.etno.be/datas/itu-matters/etno-ip-interconnection.pdf, Sep. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. N. Vallina-Rodriguez, V. Erramilli, Y. Grunenberger, L. Gyarmati, N. Laoutaris, R. Stanojevic, and K. Papagiannaki. When David helps Goliath: The Case for 3G OnLoading. In Proc. ACM Hotnets, Seattle, WA, USA, Oct 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Y. Yiakoumis, S. Katti, T. Huang, N. McKeown, K. Yap, and R. Johari. Putting Home Users in Charge of their Network. In Proc. ACM UbiComp, Sept. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Y. Yiakoumis, K. Yap, S. Katti, G. Parulkar, and N. McKeown. Slicing Home Networks. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM HomeNets Workshop, Aug. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Virtualizing the access network via open APIs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CoNEXT '13: Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Emerging networking experiments and technologies
        December 2013
        454 pages
        ISBN:9781450321013
        DOI:10.1145/2535372

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 December 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CoNEXT '13 Paper Acceptance Rate44of226submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate198of789submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader