skip to main content
10.1145/2522628.2522653acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmigConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Simulated motion blur does not improve player experience in racing game

Published:11 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motion blur effects are commonly used in racing games [Sousa 2008; Vlachos 2008; Ritchie et al. 2010] to add a sense of realism as well as to minimize artifacts due to strobing and temporal aliasing [Glassner 1999]. Typically, motion blur computations are expensive, and for real-time applications, trade-offs are made between the quality of the effects and the computational cost. In this work, we wanted to understand: (i) the practical impact of the motion blur effect on the player experience; and (ii) whether the value gained by including the effect is worth the extra cost in computation, real-time performance, development time, etc. We studied the objective and subjective aspects of the player experience for Split Second: Velocity (Black Rock Studios, Disney), a high-speed racing game, in the presence and absence of the motion blur effect. We found that neither objective measures of participants' performance (e.g., time to complete a race) nor subjective measures of the player experience (e.g, enjoyment of a race, perceived speed) were affected, even though participants could reliably detect the presence of the motion blur effect. We conclude that motion blur effects, while useful for reducing artifacts and achieving a realistic 'look', do not significantly enhance the player experience.

References

  1. Adams, E. 2007. Rethinking challenges in games and stories. In Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference, UBM TechWeb.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowles, H., Mitchell, K., Sumner, R. W., Moore, J., and Gross, M. 2012. Iterative image warping. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics) 31, 2 (May).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Burr, D., and Thompson, P. 2011. Motion psychophysics: 1985--2010. Vision Research 51(13), 1431--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Burr, D. 1980. Motion smear. Nature 284, 164--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Geisler, W. 1999. Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction. Nature 400, 64--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Glassner, A. 1999. An open and shut case. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 19, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Loviscach, J. 2005. Motion blur for textures by means of anisotropic filtering. In Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 105--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. McGuire, M., Hennessy, P., Bukowski, M., and Osman, B. 2012. A reconstruction filter for plausible motion blur. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mitchell, K. 2001. Real-time full scene anti-aliasing for pcs and consoles. In Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference, UBM TechWeb.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Navarro, F., Castillo, S., Serón, F. J., and Gutierrez, D. 2011. Motion blur rendering: state of the art. Computer Graphics Forum 30, 1, 3--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Navarro, F., Castillo, S., Serón, F. J., and Gutierrez, D. 2011. Perceptual considerations for motion blur rendering. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 8(3), 20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ritchie, M., Modern, G., and Mitchell, K., 2010. Split second motion blur. ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Talks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rosado, G. 2007. Motion blur as a post-processing effect. In GPU Gems 3. Addison Wesley, ch. 27, 575--581.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Salmon, R. A., Armstrong, M., and Jolly, S., 2011. Higher frame rates for more immersive video and television. White Paper 209, BBC Research & Development.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Shelley, B. 2001. Guidelines for developing successful games. In Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference, UBM TechWeb.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sousa, T. 2008. Crysis next-gen effects. In Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference, UBM TechWeb.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Vlachos, A. 2008. Post processing in the orange box. In Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference, UBM TechWeb.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang, L., and Bowles, H., 2012. Accelerating rendering pipelines using bidirectional iterative reprojection. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 course on Advances in Real-time Rendering in Games.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Simulated motion blur does not improve player experience in racing game

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            MIG '13: Proceedings of Motion on Games
            November 2013
            30 pages
            ISBN:9781450325462
            DOI:10.1145/2522628

            Copyright © 2013 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 11 November 2013

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • tutorial
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            MIG '13 Paper Acceptance Rate-9of-9submissions,100%Overall Acceptance Rate-9of-9submissions,100%

            Upcoming Conference

            MIG '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader