skip to main content
10.1145/2505494.2505502acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Participant recruitment and data collection framework for opportunistic sensing: a comparative analysis

Published:30 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile crowdsensing is a novel approach that exploits the sensing capabilities offered by smartphones and users' mobility to sense large scale areas without requiring the deployment of sensors in-situ. Opportunistic sensing utilizes users' normal behavior to crowd-source sensing missions. In this work, we propose a novel framework for fully distributed, opportunistic sensing that coherently integrates two main components that operate in DTN mode: i. participant recruitment and ii. data collection. We adopt a new approach to match mobility profiles of users to the coverage of the sensing mission. We analyze several distributed approaches for both components through extensive trace-based simulations, including epidemic routing, PROPHET, spray and wait, profile-cast, and opportunistic geocast. The performances of these protocols are compared using realistic mobility traces from wireless LANs, various mission coverage patterns and sink mobility profiles. Our results show how the performances of the considered protocols vary, depending on the particular scenario, and suggest guidelines for future development of distributed opportunistic sensing systems.

References

  1. N. D. Lane, S. B. Eisenman, M. Musolesi, E. Miluzzo, and A. T. Campbell. Urban sensing systems: opportunistic or participatory? In Proc. HotMobile, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Hourton, G. Del Canto, J. Bustos, and F. Lalanne. Crowd-measuring: Assessing the quality of mobile internet from end-terminals. In NetGCooP, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Reddy, D. Estrin, and M. Srivastava. Recruitment Framework for Participatory Sensing Data Collections. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. G. S. Tuncay, G. Benincasa, and A. Helmy. Autonomous and distributed recruitment and data collection framework for opportunistic sensing. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. W. Hsu, D. Dutta, and A. Helmy. CSI: A paradigm for behavior-oriented profile-cast services in mobile networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. E. B. Hamida and G. Chelius. A Line-Based Data Dissemination Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks with Mobile Sink. In IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. Basagni, A. Carosi, E. Melachrinoudis, C. Petrioli, and Z. M. Wang. Controlled sink mobility for prolonging wireless sensor networks lifetime. Wireless Networks, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Vahdat and D. Becker. Epidemic routing for partially-connected ad hoc networks. Technical report, Duke University, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Y. Wang and H. Wu. Delay/fault-tolerant mobile sensor network (dft-msn): A new paradigm for pervasive information gathering. Mobile Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. Spyropoulos, K. Psounis, and C. S. Raghavendra. Spray and wait: an efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks. In Proc. WDTN, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Lindgren, A. Doria, and O. Schelén. Probabilistic routing in intermittently connected networks. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. C. Mascolo and M. Musolesi. Scar: context-aware adaptive routing in delay tolerant mobile sensor networks. In Proc. IWCMC, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Kinalis and S. Nikoletseas. Adaptive redundancy for data propagation exploiting dynamic sensory mobility. In Proc. MSWiM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Ma and A. Jamalipour. Opportunistic geocast in disruption-tolerant networks. In IEEE GLOBECOM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. F. Bai, N. Sadagopan, and A. Helmy. Important: a framework to systematically analyze the impact of mobility on performance of routing protocols for adhoc networks. In INFOCOM, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. W. Hsu, D. Dutta, and A. Helmy. Structural Analysis of User Association Patterns in University Campus Wireless LANs. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mobilib: Community-wide library of mobility and wireless networks measurements. http://nile.cise.ufl.edu/mobilib.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. Keranen, J. Ott, and T. Karkkainen. The ONE Simulator for DTN Protocol Evaluation. In Proc. SIMUTools, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Participant recruitment and data collection framework for opportunistic sensing: a comparative analysis

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHANTS '13: Proceedings of the 8th ACM MobiCom workshop on Challenged networks
      September 2013
      76 pages
      ISBN:9781450323635
      DOI:10.1145/2505494

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 September 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHANTS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate10of25submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate61of159submissions,38%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader