skip to main content
10.1145/2501988.2501989acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Touch & activate: adding interactivity to existing objects using active acoustic sensing

Published:08 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a novel acoustic touch sensing technique called Touch & Activate. It recognizes a rich context of touches including grasp on existing objects by attaching only a vibration speaker and a piezo-electric microphone paired as a sensor. It provides easy hardware configuration for prototyping interactive objects that have touch input capability. We conducted a controlled experiment to measure the accuracy and trade-off between the accuracy and number of training rounds for our technique. From its results, per-user recognition accuracies with five touch gestures for a plastic toy as a simple example and six hand postures for the posture recognition as a complex example were 99.6% and 86.3%, respectively. Walk up user recognition accuracies for the two applications were 97.8% and 71.2%, respectively. Since the results of our experiment showed a promising accuracy for the recognition of touch gestures and hand postures, Touch & Activate should be feasible for prototype interactive objects that have touch input capability.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

uist101.mp4

mp4

85.8 MB

References

  1. Arduino - HomePage. http://www.arduino.cc/, Accessed: June 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. mbed - Rapid Prototyping for Microcontrollers. http://mbed.org/, Accessed: June 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Amento, B., Hill, W., and Terveen, L. The sound of one hand: a wrist-mounted bio-acoustic fingertip gesture interface. In CHI EA '02, 724--725. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Azenkot, S., and Zhai, S. Touch behavior with different postures on soft smartphone keyboards. In MobileHCI '12, 251--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brenner, M.C., and Fitzgibbon, J.J. Surface acoustic wave touch panel system, Feb.17 1987. US Patent 4,644,100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, C.-C., Lin, C.-J. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines., http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/livsvmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng, L.-P., Hsiao, F.-I., Liu, Y.-T., and Chen, M.Y. iRotate grasp: automatic screen rotation based on grasp of mobile devices. In UIST '12 Adjunct, 15--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Christopher, D. Frequency Range of Human Hearing. In The Physics Factbook. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins, T. Active acoustic touch interface. Electronics Letters 45, 20 (24 2009), 1055 --1056.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cralg, L. Right--rapid--rough. Ask Magazine, 13 (2003), 12--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ewins, D.J. Modal testing: theory, practice and application, vol.2. Research studies press Baldock, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fourney, A., and Terry, M. PICL: portable in-circuit learner. In UIST '12, 569--578. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Goel, M., Wobbrock, J., and Patel, S. GripSense: using built-in sensors to detect hand posture and pressure on commodity mobile phones. In UIST '12, 545--554. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Greenberg, S., and Fitchett, C. Phidgets: easy development of physical interfaces through physical widgets. In UIST '01 , 209--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gupta, A., Fox, D., Curless, B., and Cohen, M. DuploTrack: a real-time system for authoring and guiding duplo block assembly. In UIST '12, 389--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gupta, S., Morris, D., Patel, S., and Tan, D. SoundWave: using the Doppler effect to sense gestures. In CHI '12, 1911--1914. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Han, J.Y. Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In UIST '05, 115--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Harrison, C., Benko, H., and Wilson, A.D. OmniTouch: wearable multitouch interaction everywhere. In UIST '11, 441--450. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Harrison, C., and Hudson, S.E. Scratch input: creating large, inexpensive, unpowered and mobile finger input surfaces. In UIST '08, 205--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Harrison, C., Sato, M., and Poupyrev, I. Capacitive fingerprinting: exploring user differentiation by sensing electrical properties of the human body. In UIST '12, 537--544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Harrison, C., Schwarz, J., and Hudson, S.E. TapSense: enhancing finger interaction on touch surfaces. In UIST '11, 627--636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Harrison, C., Tan, D., and Morris, D. Skinput: appropriating the body as an input surface. In CHI '10, 453--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Harrison, C., Xiao, R., and Hudson, S. Acoustic barcodes: passive, durable and inexpensive notched identification tags. In UIST '12, 563--568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hartmann, B., Abdulla, L., Mittal, M., and Klemmer, S.R. Authoring sensor-based interactions by demonstration with direct manipulation and pattern recognition. In CHI '07, 145--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Hartmann, B., Klemmer, S.R., Bernstein, M., Abdulla, L., Burr, B., Robinson-Mosher, A., and Gee, J. Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis. In UIST '06, 299--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hoggan, E., Stewart, C., Haverinen, L., Jacucci, G., and Lantz, V. Pressages: augmenting phone calls with non-verbal messages. In UIST '12, 555--562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Holman, D., and Vertegaal, R. TactileTape: low-cost touch sensing on curved surfaces. In UIST '11 Adjunct, 17--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Hudson, S.E., and Mankoff, J. Rapid construction of functioning physical interfaces from cardboard, thumbtacks, tin foil and masking tape. In UIST '06, 289--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Hwang, S., Bianchi, A., and Wohn, K. MicPen: pressure-sensitive pen interaction using microphone with standard touchscreen. In CHI EA '12, 1847--1852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Izadi, S., Kim, D., Hilliges, O., Molyneaux, D., Newcombe, R., Kohli, P., Shotton, J., Hodges, S., Freeman, D., Davison, A., and Fitzgibbon, A. KinectFusion: real-time 3D reconstruction and interaction using a moving depth camera. In UIST '11, 559--568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Karlson, A.K., and Bederson, B.B. Understanding single-handed mobile device interaction. Tech. rep., Dep. of Computer Science, Univ. of Maryland, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim, K.-E., Chang, W., Cho, S.-J., Shim, J., Lee, H., Park, J., Lee, Y., and Kim, S. Hand grip pattern recognition for mobile user interfaces. In IAAI '06, 1789--1794. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Liu, S., and Guimbretiére, F. FlexAura: a flexible near-surface range sensor. In UIST '12, 327--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Lopes, P., Jota, R., and Jorge, J.A. Augmenting touch interaction through acoustic sensing. In ITS '11, 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Miyaki, T., and Rekimoto, J. Graspzoom: zooming and scrolling control model for single-handed mobile interaction. In MobileHCI '09, 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Murray-Smith, R., Williamson, J., Hughes, S., and Quaade, T. Stane: synthesized surfaces for tactile input. In CHI '08, 1299--1302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Paradiso, J.A., Leo, C.K., Checka, N., and Hsiao, K. Passive acoustic knock tracking for interactive windows. In CHI EA'02, 732--733. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Parhi, P., Karlson, A.K., and Bederson, B.B. Target size study for one-handed thumb use on small touchscreen devices. In MobileHCI '06, 203--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Pham, D., Ji, Z., Yang, M., Wang, Z., and Al-Kutubi, M. A novel human-computer interface based on passive acoustic localisation. In HCII '07, 901--909. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Rekimoto, J., and Sciammarella, E. ToolStone: effective use of the physical manipulation vocabularies of input devices. In UIST '00, 109--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Sato, M., Poupyrev, I., and Harrison, C. Touché: enhancing touch interaction on humans, screens, liquids, and everyday objects. In CHI '12, 483--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Savage, V., Zhang, X., and Hartmann, B. Midas: fabricating custom capacitive touch sensors to prototype interactive objects. In UIST '12, 579--588. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Schwarz, B.J., and Richardson, M.H. Experimental modal analysis. CSI Reliability week (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Song, H., Benko, H., Guimbretiere, F., Izadi, S., Cao, X., and Hinckley, K. Grips and gestures on a multi-touch pen. In CHI'11, 1323--1332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Stewart, J., and Westerfield, E. A theory of active sonar detection. Proceedings of the IRE 47, 5 (1959), 872--881.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Takemura, K., Ito, A., Takamatsu, J., and Ogasawara, T. Active bone-conducted sound sensing for wearable interfaces. In UIST'11 Adjunct, 53--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Taylor, B.T., and Bove, Jr., V.M. Graspables: grasp-recognition as a user interface. In CHI '09, 917--926. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Villar, N., Scott, J., Hodges, S., Hammil, K., and Miller, C. . NET Gadgeteer: a platform for custom devices. Pervasive Computing (2012), 216--233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Vogel, D., and Casiez, G. Conté: multimodal input inspired by an artist's crayon. In UIST '11, 357--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Wilson, G., Stewart, C., and Brewster, S.A. Pressure-based menu selection for mobile devices. In MobileHCI '10, 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Wimmer, R. FlyEye: grasp-sensitive surfaces using optical fiber. In TEI '10, 245--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Wimmer, R., and Baudisch, P. Modular and deformable touch-sensitive surfaces based on time domain reflectometry. In UIST '11, 517--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Wimmer, R., and Boring, S. HandSense: discriminating different ways of grasping and holding a tangible user interface. In TEI '09, 359--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Touch & activate: adding interactivity to existing objects using active acoustic sensing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UIST '13: Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
        October 2013
        558 pages
        ISBN:9781450322683
        DOI:10.1145/2501988

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 October 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        UIST '13 Paper Acceptance Rate62of317submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

        Upcoming Conference

        UIST '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader