skip to main content
10.1145/2499149.2499172acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschitalyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Touching dante: a proximity-based paradigm for tabletop browsing

Published:16 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the design of a proximity-based interaction paradigm for browsing complex information. This paradigm builds on the intrinsic characteristics of interactive tabletops, namely their physical spatial dimension, direct-touch input modality and affordance for multi-user interaction. To validate such a proposal, we developed a prototypical application about Dante's Inferno, due to the complexity, vastness and universality of this classic and to the availability of partially-structured data about the relationships between characters. Four pairs of users were involved in a user study to assess qualitatively whether the interaction paradigm would help them in collaboratively browsing a collection of data. Preliminary results are encouraging: the proposed paradigm is easily understood, is perceived as simple while still engaging, allows for collaborative learning while not forcing it, and helps highlighting and remembering connections among data.

References

  1. A. Cappelli, M. N. Catarsi, P. Michelassi, L. Moretti, M. Baglioni, F. Turini, and M. Tavoni. Knowledge mining and discovery for searching in literary texts. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Cappelli, M. Coscia, F. Giannotti, D. Pedreschi, and S. Rinzivillo. The social network of Dante's Inferno. Leonardo, 44:246--247, June 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. G. Ciocca, P. Olivo, R. Schettini. Browsing museum image collections on a multi-touch table. Inf. Syst. 37, 2, pages 169--182, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Exhibition dedicated to the examination of the social networks of the Bauhaus movement http://vimeo.com/5333614.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. Fleck, Y. Rogers, N. Yuill, P. Marshall, A. Carr, J. Rick, and V. Bonnett. Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS '09, pages 189--196, New York, N Y, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Gabrielli, S. Bellutti, A. Jameson, C. Leonardi, and M. Zancanaro. A single-user tabletop card game system for older persons: General lessons learned from an in-situ study, pages 85--88. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. L. Z. Gress, M. Fior, A. F. Hadwin, and P. H. Winne. Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning. Comput. Hum. Behav., 26: 806--814, September 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Hassenzahl. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Hum.-Comput. Interact., 19(4):319--349, Dec. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Hassenzahl, M. Burmester and F. Koller. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In Mensch & Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung, pages 187--196, Stuttgart, Germany, 2003. B. G. Teubner.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Isenberg, D. Fisher, M. Ringel, M. Kori, and I. Mary. An exploratory study of co-located collaborative visual analytics around a tabletop display. October, pages 179--186, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Isenberg, U. Hinrichs, M. Hancock, M. Tobiasz, and S. Carpendale. Information visualization on interactive tabletops in work vs. public settings. In Proc. CoVIS 2009, 2009. Appeared in the Technical Reports series of the Department of Media Informatics of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany in 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D. A. Keim, F. Mansmann, J. Schneidewind, J. Thomas, and H. Ziegler. Visual data mining. Chapter Visual Analytics: Scope and Challenges, pages 76--90. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mæve installation website. http://portal.mace-project.eu/maeve/installation.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Microsoft PixelSense technology. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/pixelsense/pixelsense.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Microsoft PixelSense's website. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/pixelsense/default.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mitsubishi's Diamond Touch. http://www.merl.com/areas/DiamondTouch/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. R. Morris. Designing tabletop groupware. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. R. Morris, A. Huang, and T. Winograd. Cooperative gestures: multi-user gestural interactions for co-located groupware. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, CHI '06, pages 1201--1210, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. Nagel, L. Pschetz, M. Stefaner, M. Halkia, and B. Müller. mæve --- an interactive tabletop installation for exploring background information in exhibitions. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part III: Ubiquitous and Intelligent Interaction, pages 483--491, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. The Natural User Interface group. http://nuigroup.com/go/lite/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. Norman. The design of everyday things. Basic Books, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. M. Piper and J. D. Hollan. Tabletop displays for small group study: affordances of paper and digital materials. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '09, pages 1227--1236, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Y. Rogers and S. Lindley. Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? Interacting with Computers, 16(6): 1133--1152, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. K. Ryall, C. Forlines, C. Shen, M. R. Morris, and K. Everitt. Experiences with and observations of direct-touch tabletops. In Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems, pages 89--96, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. D. Scott, K. D. Grant, and R. L. Mandryk. System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. In Proceedings of the eighth conference on European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, page 159178, Norwell, MA, USA, 2004. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. D. Wigdor and D. Wixon. Brave NUI World: Designing Natural User Interfaces for Touch and Gesture. Morgan Kaufmann, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Touching dante: a proximity-based paradigm for tabletop browsing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHItaly '13: Proceedings of the Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI
      September 2013
      215 pages
      ISBN:9781450320610
      DOI:10.1145/2499149

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 September 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate109of242submissions,45%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader