Sensing group proximity dynamics of firefighting teams using smartphones

ABSTRACT

Firefighters work in dangerous and unfamiliar situations under a high degree of time pressure and thus team work is of utmost importance. Relying on trained automatisms, firefighters coordinate their actions implicitly by observing the actions of their team members. To support training instructors with objective mission data, we aim to automatically detect when a firefighter is in-sight with other firefighters and to visualize the proximity dynamics of firefighting missions. In our approach, we equip firefighters with smartphones and use the built-in ANT protocol, a low-power communication radio, to measure proximity to other firefighters. In a second step, we cluster the proximity data to detect moving sub-groups. To evaluate our method, we recorded proximity data of 16 professional firefighting teams performing a real-life training scenario. We manually labeled six training sessions, involving 51 firefighters, to obtain 79 minutes of ground truth data. On average, our algorithm assigns each group member to the correct ground truth cluster with 80% accuracy. Considering height information derived from atmospheric pressure signals increases group assignment accuracy to 95%.

References

1. FIRE - Fire Information and Rescue Equipment. http://fire.me.berkeley.edu/.
2. NIST Smart Firefighting Project. http://www.nist.gov/el/fire_research/firetech/project_sff.cfm.
3. ProeTEX - Advanced e-textiles for firefighters and civilian victims. http://www.proetex.org.
4. ProFiTex - Advanced Protective Firefighting Equipment. https://www.project-profitex.eu/.
5. Wear IT at work. http://www.wearitatwork.com/.
6. Do, T. M. T., and Gatica-Perez, D. Human interaction discovery in smartphone proximity networks. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2011).
7. Eagle, N., and (Sandy) Pentland, A. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2005).
8. Fischer, C., and Gellersen, H. Location and Navigation Support for Emergency Responders: A Survey. Pervasive Computing (2010).
9. Jensen, C., Lin, D., and Ooi, B. Continuous clustering of moving objects. Knowledge and Data Engineering (2007).
10. Kalnis, P., Mamoulis, N., and Bakiras, S. On discovering moving clusters in spatio-temporal data. Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases (2005).
11. Li, Y., Han, J., and Yang, J. Clustering moving objects. In Proc. SIGKDD (2004).
12. Lymberopoulos, D., Lindsey, Q., and Savvides, A. An empirical characterization of radio signal strength variability in 3-d ieee 802.15. 4 networks using monopole antennas. Wireless Sensor Networks (2006).
13. Srinivasan, K., Dutta, P., Tavakoli, A., and Levis, P. An empirical study of low-power wireless. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (2010).
14. Stoyanova, T., Kerasiotis, F., Prayati, A., and Papadopoulos, G. Evaluation of impact factors on RSS accuracy for localization and tracking applications in sensor networks. Telecommunication Systems (2009).
15. Wilson, J., Bhargava, V., Redfern, a., and Wright, P. A Wireless Sensor Network and Incident Command Interface for Urban Firefighting. In Proc. MobiQuitous (2007).
16. Wirz, M., Kjaergaard, M. B., Feese, S., Schlăpfer, P., Roggen, D., and Tröster, G. Towards an online detection of pedestrian flocks in urban canyons by smoothed spatio-temporal clustering of gps trajectories. In Proc. LBSN (2011).

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

• Information systems

  • Information retrieval

    • Search engine architectures and scalability

      • Distributed retrieval

      • Peer-to-peer retrieval

  • Information storage systems

    • Storage architectures

      • Distributed storage