Exploring the effect of spatial layout on mediated urban interactions

ABSTRACT

In this paper we focus on the spatial configuration and emergent social interactions in two locations in London mediated by interactive and networked urban displays. Our analysis draws upon interactions mediated through displays we implemented in the real world connecting four urban spaces [1]. We outline our case study and the methodology we implemented, including the analysis of the spatial layout on the micro/local scale in two sites, followed by the observations of social behavior and technologically mediated interactions by actors, spectators and passers-by during two community events, before finally outlining the following identified interaction zones: 1) direct interaction space surrounding the display (direct); 2) the surrounding public space (wide); and 3) across spatial boundaries i.e. the remotely connected space through networked displays (connected) over time. We highlight site-specific interactions and compare them to the more generic types of interactions, thus contributing to the understanding of mediated social interactions. We suggest that the properties of the spatial layout play a significant role and, to a certain extent, frame the type of interactions mediated through public displays. We highlight in particular the dynamic and interconnected nature of this mediation, defined through the spatial layout, people, type of social activities, and time of the day.

References

1. Fatah gen. Schieck, A., Schnädelbach, H., and Penn, A. 2012. Research in the wild: exploring the potential of networked urban screens for communities and culture. In DIS'12 workshop on Research in the Wild, Newcastle, UK.
2. O'Neill, E. et al. 2006. Instrumenting the city: developing methods for observing and understanding the digital cityscape. In UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing, Bd. 4206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11853565_19
3. Behrens, M., and Fatah gen. Schieck, A. 2013. Exploring spatial configurations and actor, spectator and passer-by role in mediated public spaces. In CHI'13 workshop on Experiencing Interactivity in Public Spaces. Paris, France.
4. Goffman, E.1966. Behaviour in Public Places. The Free Press, New York.
5. Fatah gen. Schieck, A., et al. 2010. Exploring embodied mediated performative interactions in urban space. In UbiComp workshop on Designing for Performative Interactions in Public Spaces. Copenhagen, Denmark.
6. Reeves, S., Benford, S., O'Malley, C. 2005. Designing the spectator experience. In Proceedings CHI'05, ACM. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055074
7. Galloway, K. and Rabinowitz, S.1980. Hole-in-Space, New York/Los Angeles, USA.
8. www.talktalk.co.uk/telectroscope;www.connectingcities.net
9. Storz, O. et al. 2006. Public Ubiquitous computing systems: lessons from the e-campus display deployments. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 05(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2006.56
10. Brignull, H. and Rogers, Y. 2003. Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In Proceedings INTERACT'03. Zurich, Switzerland.
11. Vogel, D. and Balakrishnan, R. 2004. Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. In UIST'04. New Mexico. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1029632.1029656
12. Memarovic, N., Langheinrich, M., Alt, F., Elhart, I., Hosio, S., and Rubegni, E. 2012. Using public displays to stimulate passive engagement, active engagement, and discovery in public spaces. In Media Architecture Biennale'12. ACM. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2421076.2421086
13. Taylor, N., Cheverst, K. 2009. Social interaction around a rural community photo display. In: Int. J. of Hum.-Comp. Studies, 67, 12, Elsevier, Amsterdam. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.07.006
14. Fatah gen Schieck, A., Briones, C., and Mottram, C. 2008. The urban screen as a socialising platform: exploring the role of place within the urban space, In MEDIACITY. Situations, Practices and Encounters. Frank & Timme GmbH.
15. O'Hara, K. et al. 2008. Understanding collective play in an urban screen game. In Proceedings CSCW '08, ACM. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460576
16. Peltonen, P. et al. 2008. It's mine, don't touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. In Proceedings CHI'08, ACM. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357255
17. Fatah gen. Schieck, A., Shaojun F. 2012. Connected urban spaces: exploring interactions mediated through situated networked screens. In Proceedings Space Syntax Symposium'12, Chile.
18. Muller, J., et al. 2012. Looking glass: a field study on noticing interactivity of a shop window. In Proceedings CHI 2012. Texas, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207718
19. Michelis, D., and Muller, J. 2011. The audience funnel: observations of gesture based interaction with multiple large displays in a city center. In International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, (1).
20. Fischer, P. T., and Hornecker, E. 2012. Urban HCI: spatial aspects in the design of shared encounters for media facades. In Proceedings CHI'12. Texas. USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207719
21. Fischer, P. T., and Hornecker, E. 2011. Urban HCI -- Interaction Patterns in the Built Environment. Doctoral Consortium contribution at BritishHCI'11.
22. Brynskov, M. et al. 2009. Staging urban interactions with media façades. In Proceedings INTERACT'09. Berlin, Heidelberg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_20
23. Vande Moere, A. and Wouters, N. 2012. The role of context in media architecture. In Proceedings PerDisp'12, ACM. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2307798.2307810
24. Hillier und J. Hanson.1984. The social logic of space, Bd. Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
25. Gehl, J, and Gemzøe, L. 1996. Public Spaces and Public Life. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.
26. Carmona, M. P., Heath, T., Oc, T. and Tiesdell, S. 2003. Public Places Urban Spaces, Architectural Press.
27. Seamon, D., A Geography of the lifeworld: Movement, rest and encounter. St. Martin's Press, New York (1979).
28. Scupelli, P. et al. 2007. Using isovist views to study placement of large displays in natural settings. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, USA: ACM Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1241056
29. Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Index Terms

• Information systems

  • Information systems applications

    • Multimedia information systems