skip to main content
10.1145/2491288.2491307acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quantize-map-forward (QMF) relaying: an experimental study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the design and experimental evaluation of a wireless system that exploits relaying in the context of WiFi. We opt for WiFi given its popularity and wide spread use for a number of applications, such as smart homes. Our testbed consists of three nodes, a source, a relay and a destination, that operate using the physical layer procedures of IEEE802.11. We deploy three main competing strategies that have been proposed for relaying, Decode-and-Forward (DF), Amplify-and-Forward (AF) and Quantize-Map-Forward (QMF). QMF is the most recently introduced of the three, and although it was shown in theory to approximately achieve the capacity of arbitrary wireless networks, its performance in practice had not been evaluated. We present in this work experimental results---to the best of our knowledge, the first ones---that compare QMF, AF and DF in a realistic indoor setting. We find that QMF is a competitive scheme to the other two, offering in some cases up to 12% throughput benefits and up to 60% improvement in frame error-rates over the next best scheme.

References

  1. Local and metropolitan area networks-specific requirements part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. IEEE Std 802.11-2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. WARP Project, http://warpproject.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alamouti, S. A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Select Areas in Communications 16, 8 (October 1998), 1451--1458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Atsan, E., Knopp, R., Diggavi, S., and Fragouli, C. Towards integrating quantize-map-forward relaying into LTE. In Proceedings of the IEEE Information Theory Workshop (September 2012), pp. 212--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Avestimehr, A. S., Diggavi, S. N., and Tse, D. N. C. Wireless network information flow: A deterministic approach. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 57, 4 (April 2011), 1872--1905. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Balan, H. V., Rogalin, R., Michaloliakos, A., Psounis, K., and Caire, G. AirSync: Enabling distributed multiuser MIMO with full spatial multiplexing. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 99 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradford, G., and Laneman, J. N. An experimental framework for the evaluation of cooperative diversity. In Proceedings of the IEEE CISS (March 2009), pp. 641--645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bradford, G., and Laneman, J. N. A survey of implementation efforts and experimental design for cooperative communications. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICASSP (2010), pp. 5602--5605.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Chang, K. et al. Relay operation in 802.11ad. In IEEE 802.11ad TGad 1-/0494r1 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cover, T. M., and Gamal, A. E. Capacity theorems for the relay channel. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 25, 5 (September 1979), 572--584. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hunter, C., Murphy, P., and Sabharwal, A. Real-time testbed implementation of a distributed cooperative MAC and PHY. In Proceedings of the IEEE CISS (March 2010), pp. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Knox, M., and Erkip, E. Implementation of cooperative communications using software defined radios. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICASSP (March 2010), pp. 5618--5621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Korakis, T., Knox, M., Erkip, E., and Panwar, S. Cooperative network implementation using open-source platforms. IEEE Communications Magazine 47, 2 (2009), 134--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lim, S. H., Kim, Y.-H., Gamal, A. E., and Chung, S.-Y. Noisy network coding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 57, 5 (May 2011), 3132--3152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Liu, P., Tao, Z., Narayanan, S., Korakis, T., and Panwar, S. CoopMAC: A cooperative MAC for wireless LANs. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 25, 2 (February 2007), 340--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Loiacono, M., Rosca, J., and Trappe, W. The snowball effect: Detailing performance anomalies of 802.11 rate adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE GLOBECOM (November 2007), pp. 5117--5122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Murphy, P. Design, Implementation, and Characterization of a Cooperative Communications System. PhD thesis, Rice University, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Murphy, P., and Sabharwal, A. Design, implementation, and characterization of a cooperative communications system. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 60, 6 (July 2011), 2534--2544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Nagpal, V., Wang, I.-H., Jorgovanovic, M., Tse, D., and Nikolic, B. Coding and system design for quantize-map-and-forward relaying. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (August 2013). See also arXiv:1209.4679 {cs.IT}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ozgur, A., and Diggavi, S. Approximately achieving Gaussian relay network capacity with lattice codes. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (June 2010), pp. 669--673. See also arXiv:1005.1284 {cs.IT}.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Rahul, H., Hassanieh, H., and Katabi, D. SourceSync: a distributed wireless architecture for exploiting sender diversity. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM (August 2010), pp. 171--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sengupta, A., Brahma, S., Ozgur, A., Fragouli, C., and Diggavi, S. Graph-based codes for quantize-map-and-forward relaying. In Proceedings of the IEEE Information Theory Workshop (October 2011), pp. 140--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Sun, T., Zhang, Y., and Trappe, W. Improving access point association protocols through channel utilization and adaptive switching. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (October 2011), pp. 155--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tse, D., and Viswanath, P. Fundamentals of Wireless Communication. Cambridge University Press, May 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Zhang, J., Jia, J., Zhang, Q., and Lo, E. M. K. Implementation and evaluation of cooperative communication schemes in software-defined radio testbed. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM (March 2010), pp. 1307--1315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Zhang, X., and Shin, K. G. DAC: Distributed asynchronous cooperation for wireless relay networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM (March 2010), pp. 1064--1072. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Quantize-map-forward (QMF) relaying: an experimental study

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MobiHoc '13: Proceedings of the fourteenth ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing
          July 2013
          322 pages
          ISBN:9781450321938
          DOI:10.1145/2491288

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 July 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          MobiHoc '13 Paper Acceptance Rate42of234submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate296of1,843submissions,16%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader