skip to main content
10.1145/2487575.2488188acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

U-Air: when urban air quality inference meets big data

Published:11 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Information about urban air quality, e.g., the concentration of PM2.5, is of great importance to protect human health and control air pollution. While there are limited air-quality-monitor-stations in a city, air quality varies in urban spaces non-linearly and depends on multiple factors, such as meteorology, traffic volume, and land uses. In this paper, we infer the real-time and fine-grained air quality information throughout a city, based on the (historical and real-time) air quality data reported by existing monitor stations and a variety of data sources we observed in the city, such as meteorology, traffic flow, human mobility, structure of road networks, and point of interests (POIs). We propose a semi-supervised learning approach based on a co-training framework that consists of two separated classifiers. One is a spatial classifier based on an artificial neural network (ANN), which takes spatially-related features (e.g., the density of POIs and length of highways) as input to model the spatial correlation between air qualities of different locations. The other is a temporal classifier based on a linear-chain conditional random field (CRF), involving temporally-related features (e.g., traffic and meteorology) to model the temporal dependency of air quality in a location. We evaluated our approach with extensive experiments based on five real data sources obtained in Beijing and Shanghai. The results show the advantages of our method over four categories of baselines, including linear/Gaussian interpolations, classical dispersion models, well-known classification models like decision tree and CRF, and ANN.

References

  1. A. V. Donkelaar, R. V. Martin, and R. J. Park (2006), Estimating ground-level PM2.5 using aerosol optical depth determined from satellite remote sensing, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D21201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. Hasenfratz, O. Saukh, S. Sturzenegger, and L. Thiele. Participatory Air Pollution Monitoring Using Smartphones. In the 2nd International Workshop on Mobile Sensing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Y. Jiang, K. Li, L. Tian, R. Piedrahita, X. Yun, O. Mansata, Q. Lv, R. P. Dick, M. Hannigan, and L. Shang. Maqs: A personalized mobile sensing system for indoor air quality. In Proc. of UbiComp 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, F. Pereira (2001). Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. of 18th International Conf. on Machine Learning. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Ma, Y. Zheng, O. Wolfson. T-Share: A Large-Scale Dynamic Taxi Ridesharing Service. In Proc. of ICDE 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. N. Lamsal, R. V. Martin, A. V. Donkelaar, M. Steinbacher, E. A. Celarier, E. Bucsela, E. J. Dunlea, and J. P. Pinto (2008), Ground-level nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from the satellite-borne Ozone Monitoring Instrument, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D1630.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. V. Martin. Satellite remote sensing of surface air quality, Atmospheric Environment (2008), doi:10.1016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. K. Nigam, R. Ghani. Analyzing the Effectiveness and Applicability of Co-Training. In Proc. of CIKM 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Vardoulakis, B. E. A. Fisher, K. Pericleous, N. Gonzalez-Flesca. Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmospheric Environment 37 (2003) 155--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J.S. Scire, D.G. Strimaitis and R.J. Yamartino, 2000b: User's Guide for the CALPUFF Dispersion Model, (Version 5.0), Earth Tech, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Yuan, Y. Zheng, X. Xie. Discovering regions of different functions in a city using human mobility and POIs. In Proc. of KDD 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Yuan, Y. Zheng, C. Zhang, X. Xie, G. Sun. An Interactive-Voting based Map Matching Algorithm. In Proc. of MDM 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Yuan, Y. Zheng, X. Xie, G. Sun. Driving with Knowledge from the Physical World. In Proc. of KDD 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Zheng, Y. Liu, J. Yuan, X. Xie. Urban Computing with Taxicabs. In Proc. of UbiComp 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. F. Zhang, D. Wilkie, Y. Zheng, X. Xie. Sensing the Pulse of Urban Refueling Behavior. In Proc. of UbiComp 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. U-Air: when urban air quality inference meets big data

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          KDD '13: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
          August 2013
          1534 pages
          ISBN:9781450321747
          DOI:10.1145/2487575

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 August 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          KDD '13 Paper Acceptance Rate125of726submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

          Upcoming Conference

          KDD '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader