Yvonne Rogers
Gary Marsden
- Newell, A. Design and the Digital Divide: insights from 40 Years in Computer Support for Older and Disabled People. Morgan and Claypool, 2011.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- This can be economically, intellectually, physically, emotionally or educationally; "than us" refers to HCI researchers employed at universities, research institutions, companies, etc., who are funded to conduct research.Google Scholar
- Kramer, K.L., Dedrick, J., and Sharma. P. One laptop per child: Vision vs. reality. Commun. ACM 52, 6 (2009), 66--73. Google ScholarDigital Library
- One laptop per child; http://one.laptop.org/Google Scholar
- Shneiderman, B. Universal usability. Commun. ACM 43, 5 (2000), 84--91. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Taylor, S. Out there. Proc. CHI '11. 2011, 685--694. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cooper, G. Representing the User. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Open University, U.K, 1991.Google Scholar
- Rogers, Y. Reconfiguring the social scientist: Shifting from prescription to proactive research. In Social Science, Information Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. G. Bowker, S.L. Star, and B. Turner, eds. L. Erlbaum Assoc., 1997, 57--78.Google Scholar
- Cooper, G. and Bowers, J. Representing the user: Notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human-computer interaction. Cambridge Series On Human Computer Interaction (1995), 48--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Satchell, C. and Dourish, P. Beyond the user: Use and non-use in HCI. Proc. OZCHI'09. 2009, 9--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogers, Y. Moving on from Weiser's vision of calm computing: Engaging UbiComp experiences. Proc. Ubicomp'06. 2006, 404--421. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Consolvo, S., Roessler, P., Shelton, B., LaMarca, A., Schilit, B., and Bly, S. Technology for care networks for elders. Pervasive Computing 3, 2 (2004), 22--29. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mynatt, E., Melenhorst, A., Fisk, A.D., and Rogers, W. Aware technologies for aging in place: Understanding user needs and attitudes. Pervasive Computing 3, 2 (2004), 36--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beckwith, R. and Lederer, S. Designing for one's dotage: UbiComp and residential care facilities. Conf. on the Networked Home and the Home of the Future (Irvine, CA). 2003.Google Scholar
- Anderson, K. and Dourish, P. Situated Privacies: Do you know where you mother {trucker} is? Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 2005.Google Scholar
- ICT hand in hand with social innovation. Interviews with Lena Gustafsson and Silas Olsson. 2012; www.projectsmagazine.eu.comGoogle Scholar
- Bannon, L. Reimagining HCI: Toward a more human-centered perspective. interactions 18, 4 (2011), 50--57. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Waycott et al. Older adults as digital content producers. Proc. CHI'13. 2013, 39--48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marsden, G., Maunder, A., and Parker, M. People are people, but technology is not technology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. (2008), 1--10.Google Scholar
- Shneiderman, B. Leonardo's Laptop: Human Needs and the New Computing Technologies, MIT Press, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nelson, H.G. and Stolterman, E. The Design Way: Second Edition. MIT Press, 2012.Google Scholar
- Mueller, S., Lopes, P., and Baudisch, P. Interactive construction: Interactive fabrication of functional mechanical devices. Proc. UIST 2012. 2012, 599--606. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Buechley, L. and Perner-Wilson, H. Crafting technology: Reimagining the processes, materials, and cultures of electronics. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19, 3 (2013), article 17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogers, Y. Interaction design gone wild: Striving for wild theory, interactions 18, 4 (2011), 58--62. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogers, Y. HCI Theory: Classical, Modern and Contemporary. Morgan and Claypool, 2012.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Does he take sugar?: moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion
Recommendations
SUGAR: A high-level programming language for geographical analysis and mapping
The papers of the ACM symposium on Graphic languagesThis paper presents the recently designed interactive computer language for cartography called SUGAR. It is intended for use by non-computer specialists, especially geographers, city planners and landscape architects to make maps by computer. The syntax ...
Inferring scope through syntactic sugar
Many languages use syntactic sugar to define parts of their surface language in terms of a smaller core. Thus some properties of the surface language, like its scoping rules, are not immediately evident. Nevertheless, IDEs, refactorers, and other tools ...
Comments