skip to main content
10.1145/2486092.2486131acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespadsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reducing simulation costs of embedded simulation in yard crane dispatching in container terminals

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 May 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Embedding simulation in optimization algorithms will incur computational costs. For NP-hard problems the computational costs of the embedded simulation in the optimization algorithm are likely to be substantial. YC dispatching is NP-hard. So it is very important to be able to minimize simulation costs in YC dispatching algorithms. In the optimization algorithm for yard crane dispatching published, simulation of YC operations of the entire (partial) sequence of YC jobs are carried out each time the tardiness of a (partial) sequence needs to be evaluated. In this paper we study two approaches to reduce simulation costs in these embedded simulations in the optimization algorithm. Experimental results show that one approach significantly reduces the computational time of the optimization algorithm. We also analyze the reasons for the other approach which fails to reduce the computational time.

References

  1. Cao, Z., D. H. Lee, and Q. Meng. 2008. Deployment strategies of double-rail-mounted gantry crane systems for loading outbound containers in container terminals, International Journal of Production Economics, 115, 221--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Chu, C. 1992. A branch-and-bound algorithm to minimize total tardiness with different release dates, In Naval Research Logistics, 39(2), 265--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Guo, X., S. Y. Huang, W. J. Hsu, M. Y. H. Low. 2011. Dynamic Yard Crane Dispatching in Container Terminals with Predicted Vehicle Arrival Information, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(3), 472--484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Huang S. Y., X. Guo, W. J. Hsu and W. L. Lim. 2012. Yard Crane Dispatching to Minimize Job Tardiness in Container Terminals, The 2012 International Conference on Logistics and Maritime Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang S. Y., X. Guo, W. J. Hsu and W. L. Lim. 2012. Embedding Simulation in Yard Crane Dispatching to Minimize Job Tardiness in Container Terminals, Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Huang S. Y., Z. C. Tay and W. J. Hsu. A Framework for Automated Real Time Management of Container Handling Equipment. To be submitted to The 2013 International Conference on Logistics and Maritime Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jung, S. H., and K. H. Kim. 2006. Load scheduling for multiple quay cranes in port container terminals, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17, 479--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kim, K. H., J. S. Kang, and K. R. Ryu. 2004. A beam search algorithm for the load sequencing of outbound containers in port container terminals, OR Spectrum, 26, 93--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kim, K. M., and K. Y. Kim. 1999. An optimal routing algorithm for a transfer crane in port container terminals, Transportation Science, 33(1), 17--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kim, K. Y., and K. H. Kim. 2003. Heuristic algorithms for routing yard-side equipment for minimizing loading times in container terminals, Naval Research Logistics, 50, 498--514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lee, L. H., E. P. Chew, K. C. Tan, and Y.B. Han. 2006. An optimization model for storage yard management in transshipment hubs, OR Spectrum, 28, 539--561.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Li, W., Y. Wu, M. Petering, M. Goh, and R. d. Souza. 2009. Discrete time model and algorithms for container yard crane scheduling, European Journal of Operational Research, 198, 165--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Narasimhan A. and U.S. Palekar. 2002. Analysis and Algorithm for the Transtainer Routing Problem in Container Port Operation, Transportation Science 36(1), 63--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ng, W. C. and K. L. Mak. 2005. An effective heuristic for scheduling a yard crane to handle jobs with different ready times, Engineering Optimization, 37(8), 867--877.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Steenken, D., S. Vo², and R. Stahlbock. 2004. Container terminal operation and operations research -- a classification and literature review, OR Spectrum, 26, 3--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Zeng, Q. and Z. Yang. 2009. Integrating simulation and optimization to schedule loading operations in container terminals, Computers & Operations Research, 36(6), 1935--1944. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reducing simulation costs of embedded simulation in yard crane dispatching in container terminals

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGSIM PADS '13: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSIM Conference on Principles of Advanced Discrete Simulation
          May 2013
          426 pages
          ISBN:9781450319201
          DOI:10.1145/2486092

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 May 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGSIM PADS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate29of75submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate398of779submissions,51%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader