skip to main content
10.1145/2486092.2486124acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespadsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Simulation-based verification of hybrid automata stochastic logic formulas for stochastic symmetric nets

Published:19 May 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Hybrid Automata Stochastic Logic (HASL) has been recently defined as a flexible way to express classical performance measures as well as more complex, path-based ones (generically called "HASL formulas"). The considered paths are executions of Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets (GSPN), which are an extension of the basic Petri net formalism to define discrete event stochastic processes. The computation of the HASL formulas for a GSPN model is demanded to the COSMOS tool, that applies simulation techniques to the formula computation. Stochastic Symmetric Nets (SSN) are a high level Petri net formalism, of the colored type, in which tokens can have an identity, and it is well known that colored Petri nets allow one to describe systems in a more compact and parametric form than basic (uncolored) Petri nets. In this paper we propose to extend HASL and COSMOS to support colors, so that performance formulas for SSN can be easily defined and evaluated. This requires a new definition of the logic, to ensure that colors are taken into account in a correct and useful manner, and a significant extension of the COSMOS tool.

References

  1. A. Aziz, K. Sanwal, V. Singhal, and R. Brayton. Model-checking continuous-time Markov chains. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic, 1(1):162--170, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Balbo, M. Beccuti, M. De Pierro, and G. Franceschinis. First Passage Time Computation in Tagged GSPNs with Queue Places. The Computer Journal, 2010. First published online July 22, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Balbo, M. Beccuti, M. D. Pierro, and G. Franceschinis. Computing first passage time distributions in stochastic well-formed nets. In ICPE'11 - Second Joint WOSP/SIPEW International Conference on Performance Engineering, pages 7--18, Karlsruhe, Germany, March 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Ballarini, H. Djafri, M. Duflot, S. Haddad, and N. Pekergin. COSMOS: a statistical model checker for the hybrid automata stochastic logic. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST'11), pages 143--144, Aachen, Germany, Sept. 2011. IEEE Computer Society Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Ballarini, H. Djafri, M. Duflot, S. Haddad, and N. Pekergin. HASL: An expressive language for statistical verification of stochastic models. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools (VALUETOOLS'11), pages 306{315, Cachan, France, May 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Barbot, S. Haddad, and C. Picaronny. Coupling and importance sampling for statistical model checking. In C. Flanagan and B. König, editors, TACAS, volume 7214 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 331--346. Springer, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. B. Barbot, S. Haddad, and C. Picaronny. Importance sampling for model checking of continuous time markov chains. In P. Dini and P. Lorenz, editors, SIMUL 2012, pages 30--35, Lisbon, Portugal, Novembre 2012. IARIA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Chen, T. Han, J.-P. Katoen, and A. Mereacre. Quantitative Model Checking of Continuous-Time Markov Chains Against Timed Automata Specifications. Logic in Computer Science, Symposium on, 0:309--318, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Chiola, C. Dutheillet, G. Franceschinis, and S. Haddad. Stochastic well-formed coloured nets for symmetric modelling applications. IEEE Trans. on Computers, 42(11):1343--1360, nov 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Clark and S. Gilmore. State-aware performance analysis with extended stochastic probes. In Proceedings of the 5th European Performance Engineering Workshop on Computer Performance Engineering, EPEW '08, pages 125--140, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Donatelli, S. Haddad, and J. Sproston. Model checking timed and stochastic properties with CSLTA. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 35(2):224--240, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. E. Emerson and E. M. Clarke. Using branching time temporal logic to synthesize synchronization skeletons. Science of Computer Programming, 2(3):241 -- 266, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. R. Gaeta. Efficient discrete-event simulation of colored petri nets. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 22(9):629--639, Sept. 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Hillston. Process algebras for quantitative analysis. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pages 239--248, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. A. Marsan, G. Balbo, G. Conte, S. Donatelli, and G. Franceschinis. Modeling with Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets. J. Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. W. D. Obal, II and W. H. Sanders. State-space support for path-based reward variables. Perform. Eval., 35:233--251, May 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Pnueli. The temporal logic of programs. In FOCS, pages 46--57. IEEE Computer Society, 1977. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. K. Sen, M. Viswanathan, and G. Agha. Statistical model checking of black-box probabilistic systems. In In 16th conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV O04), volume 3114 of LNCS, pages 202--215. Springer, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. The CosyVerif Group. Cosyverif. http://www.cosyverif.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Wau Men Au-Yeung. Response Times in Healthcare Systems. PhD thesis, Imperial College, London, 2008. pubs.doc.ic.ac.uk/response-times-in-healthcare.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. H. L. S. Younes. Ymer: A statistical model checker. In COMPUTER AIDED VERIFICATION. LNCS, pages 429--433. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Simulation-based verification of hybrid automata stochastic logic formulas for stochastic symmetric nets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSIM PADS '13: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSIM Conference on Principles of Advanced Discrete Simulation
      May 2013
      426 pages
      ISBN:9781450319201
      DOI:10.1145/2486092

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 May 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGSIM PADS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate29of75submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate398of779submissions,51%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader