skip to main content
10.1145/2482767.2482808acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Computationally unifying urban masterplanning

Published:14 May 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Architectural design, particularly in large scale masterplanning projects, has yet to fully undergo the computational revolution experienced by other design-led industries such as automotive and aerospace. These industries use computational frameworks to undertake automated design analysis and design space exploration. However, within the Architectural, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industries we find no such computational platforms. This precludes the rapid analysis needed for quantitative design iteration which is required for sustainable design. This is a current computing frontier.

This paper considers the computational solutions to the challenges preventing such advances to improve architectural design performance for a more sustainable future. We present a practical discussion of the computational challenges and opportunities in this industry and present a computational framework "HierSynth" with a data model designed to the needs of this industry.

We report the results and lessons learned from applying this framework to a major commercial urban masterplanning project. This framework was used to automate and augment existing practice and was used to undertake previously infeasible, designer lead, design space exploration. During the casestudy an order of magnitude more analysis cycles were undertaken than literature suggests is normal; each occurring in hours not days.

References

  1. Autodesk. Autodesk lab's project vasari. Website, November 2012. http://labs.autodesk.com/utilities/vasari/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. E. Ayaz and J. Levitas. Spatially linked integrated resource management (IRM): A tool to inform eco-city planning. Proceedings of the 8th International Eco-city Conference 2008, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. S. Bittermann. Intelligent Design Objects (IDO) - A cognitive approach for performance-based design. Delft University of Technology, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. buildingSMART Alliance. Industry foundation classes (ifc). Website, October 2012. http://buildingsmart.com/standards/ifc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Comesol. Comsol multiphysics. Website, Sept. 2012. http://www.comsol.com/products/multiphysics/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dassault System. Isight & the simulia execution engine. Website, September 2012. http://www.3ds.com/products/simulia/portfolio/isight-simulia-execution-engine/overview/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Doboš and A. Steed. 3d revision control framework. In Web3D '12, Web3D '12, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Easterbrook. Climate change: a grand software challenge. In Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research, pages 99--104. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Eastman. The evolution of aec interoperability. EG-ICE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. C. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston. BIM Handbook. John Wiley and Sons, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. F. Flager and J. Haymaker. A comparison of multidisciplinary design, analysis and optimization processes in the building construction and aerospace industries. 24th International Conference on Information Technology in Construction. I. Smith. Maribor, Slovenia, pages 625--630, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. F. Flager, B. Welle, P. Bansal, G. Soremekun, and J. Haymaker. Multidisciplinary process integration and design optimization of a classroom building. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. gbXML Board of Directors. Open green building xml schema. Website, November 2012. http://gbxml.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Geyer. Component-oriented decomposition for multidisciplinary design optimization in building design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Holistic City Software. Citycad - technology for liveable cities. Website, September 2012. http://www.holisticcity.co.uk/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Keirstead, N. Samsatli, and N. Shah. Syncity: An integrated tool kit for urban energy systems modelling. Proceedings of the 5th Urban Research Symposium, Marseille, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Khronos Group Inc. Collaborative design activity (collada) format. Website, July 2010. https://collada.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. H. Liang and D. Birch. Extraction and analysis methodology for supporting complex sustainable design. 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED11), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. P. J. Littlefair. Site layout planning for daylight and sunlight: a guide to good practice. Building Research Establishment, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. K. Lomas, H. Eppel, C. Martin, and D. Bloomfield. Empirical validation of building energy simulation programs. Energy and Buildings, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. Page, N. Grange, and N. Kirkpatrick. The integrated resource management (IRM) model. 25th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Phoenix Integration. Phx modelcenter. Website, July 2012. http://www.phoenix-int.com/software/phx-modelcenter.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. R. Plackett and J. Burman. The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika, pages pp.305--325, 1946.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Rhinoceros Team. Rhinoceros - 3d modelling software. Website, August 2011. http://www.rhino3d.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. K. Shea, A. Sedgwick, and G. Antonuntto. Multicriteria optimization of paneled building envelopes using ant colony optimization. EG-ICE Workshop, 13:627--636, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Simondetti. BEM for collaborative design inception. Arup Foresight and Innovation, October 2011. http://tinyurl.com/BEMclient.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Unity3d. Unity3d games engine. Website, August 2012. http://www.unity3d.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. G. Vanderplaats and F. Moses. Automated optimal geometry design of structures. Journal of the Structural Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. G. J. Ward. The radiance lighting simulation and rendering system. Computer Graphics (Proceedings of '94 SIGGRAPH conference), 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Computationally unifying urban masterplanning

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CF '13: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers
            May 2013
            302 pages
            ISBN:9781450320535
            DOI:10.1145/2482767

            Copyright © 2013 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 14 May 2013

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            CF '13 Paper Acceptance Rate26of49submissions,53%Overall Acceptance Rate240of680submissions,35%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader