skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2481360acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

DIY, hacking, and craft have recently drawn attention in HCI and CSCW, largely as a collaborative and creative hobbyist practice. We shift the focus from the recreational elements of this practice to the ways in which it democratizes design and manufacturing. This democratized technological practice, we argue, unifies playfulness, utility, and expressiveness, relying on some industrial infrastructures while creating demand for new types of tools and literacies. Thriving on top of collaborative digital systems, the Maker movement both implicates and impacts professional designers. As users move more towards personalization and reappropriation, new design opportunities are created for HCI.

References

  1. .Expert Villiage. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/user/expertvillage on September 14, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. .Reprap. Retrieved from http://reprap.org/wiki/RepRap on January 13, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. (2010). In the Next Industrial Revolution, Atoms Are the New Bits. Wired, 18, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, N. (1961). Work and Leisure. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardzell, S., Rosner, D. K. and Bardzell, J. (2012). Crafting Quality in Design. Proc. DIS'12 11--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bilton, N. and Markoff, J. (2012). A Hardware Renaissance in Silicon Valley. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/26/technology/silicon-valleys-hardware-renaissance.html on September 14, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bleeker, J. (2009). Design Fiction.Retrieved from http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2009/03/17/design-fiction-a-short-essay-on-design-science-fact-andfiction/ on September 2, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bogost, I. (2006). Wii's Revolution Is in the Past. Retrieved from http://seriousgamessource.com/features/feature_112806_wii_1.php on July 22, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bojin, N. (2008). The Way Wii Were: A Blogosphere Retrospective. Loading - The Journal of the Canadian Games Studies Association, 1, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Brody, A. (2006). The Cleaners You Aren't Meant to See. Antipode, 38, 3, 534--556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Buechley, L., Eisenberg, M., Catchen, J. and Crockett, A. (2008). The Lilypad Arduino. Proc. CHI'08 423--432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Buechley, L., Rosner, D. K., Paulos, E. and Williams, A. (2009). Workshop: Diy for Chi. Proc. CHI'09 Extended Abstracts 4823--4826. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Colao, J. J. (2012). Makerbot: 3-D Printing for Your Living Room. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jjcolao/2012/06/06/makerbot-3-d-printing-for-your-living-room/ on September 13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dougherty, D. (2012). Darpa Mentor Award to Bring Making to Education. O'Reilly. Retrieved from http://blog.makezine.com/2012/01/19/darpa-mentoraward-to-bring-making-to-education/ on September 13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dougherty, D. (2012). Makerspaces in Education and Darpa. O'Reilly. Retrieved from http://blog.makezine.com/2012/04/04/makerspaces-ineducation-and-darpa/ on September 13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Dourish, P. and Bell, G. (to appear). "Resistance Is Futile": Reading Science Fiction Alongside Ubiquitous Computing. Pers. Ubiq. Comput.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dovey, J. and Kennedy, H. W. (2006). Game Cultures. Open University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Downs, D. (2012). 5 Kickstarter Projects Slammed with Success. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/design/2012/07/st_kickstarter/?pid=695 on September 13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fry, B. and Reas, C. (2012). Processing. Retrieved from http://processing.org/ on September 13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gelber, S. (1999). Hobbies. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenberg, A. (2012). 'Wiki Weapon Project' Aims to Create a Gun Anyone Can 3-D Print at Home. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/08/23/wiki-weapon-project-aims-to-create-a-gun-anyone-can3d-print-at-home/ on September 14, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hertz, G. (2012). Critical Making.Retrieved from http://www.conceptlab.com/criticalmaking/ on September 13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Innis, H. A. (1991). The Bias of Communication. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible Bits. Proc. CHI'97 234--241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kamkwamba, W. (2009). The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind. William Morrow.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Krahulik, M. and Holkins, J. (2006). Penny Arcade. Retrieved from http://www.pennyarcade.com/comic/2006/11/13/ on october 6th, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kushner, D. (2011). The Making of Arduino. IEEE. Retrieved from http://spectrum.ieee.org/geeklife/hands-on/the-making-of-arduino/0 on September 13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuznetsov, S. and Paulos, E. (2010). Rise of the Expert Amateur. Proc. NordiCHI'10 295--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Levy, P. (1999). Collective Intelligence. Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindtner, S. and Li, D. (2012). Created in China: The Makings of China's Hackerspace Community. Interactions, 19, 6 (November 2012), 18--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Maines, R. P. (2009). Hedonizing Technologies. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimor, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Make Magazine. (2012). Special Edition: School's Out! Summer Fun Guide. O'Reilly.Retrieved from http://www.makershed.com/category_s/214.htm on September 14, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mcluhan, M. and Mcluhan, E. (1992). Laws of Media. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Mota, C. (2011). The Rise of Personal Fabrication. Proc. C&C'11 279--287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Moynihan, C. (2012). Scores Cuffed or Cited by End of Day of Demonstrations. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/02/scorescuffed-or-cited-by-end-of-day-of-demonstrations/ on September 13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. O'reilly Media. (2012). Maker Faire. Retrieved from http://makerfaire.com on September 13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Oroza, E. (2012). Technological Disobedience. Make Shift - A Journal of Hidden Creativity, 1, 3, 50--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Owen, W. (2012). Hillsboro's Girls Get It Camp Introduces Sciene, Technology, and Engineering to Girls. The Oregonian. Retrieved from http://www.oregonlive.com/hillsboro/index.ssf/2012/07/hillsboros_girls_get_it_camp_i.html on September 13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Paulos, E., Honicky, R. J. and Hooker, B. (2008). Citizen Science. In Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics, M. Foth, eds. IGI Global, Hershey, PA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Ratto, M. (2011). Critical Making. The Information Society, 27, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Rosner, D. K. (2012). The Material Practices of Collaboration. Proc. CSCW'12 1155--1164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Rosner, D. K. and Bean, J. (2009). Learning from Ikea Hacking. Proc. CHI'09 419--422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Scott, J. (1985). Weapons of the Weak. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Tanenbaum, J., Tanenbaum, K. and Wakkary, R. (2012). Steampunk as Design Fiction. Proc. CHI'12 1583--1592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. The Economist. (2012). The Third Industrial Revolution. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/21553017 on September 13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Torrey, C., Churchill, E. F. and Mcdonald, D. W. (2009). Learning How. Proc. CHI'09 1371--1380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Upton, L. (2012). Raspberry Pi. Retrieved from http://www.raspberrypi.org/ on September 14, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang, T. and Kaye, J. J. (2011). Inventive Leisure Practices. Proc. CHI'11 263--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader