skip to main content
10.1145/2480362.2480392acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An algorithm for discovering clusters of different densities or shapes in noisy data sets

Published:18 March 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

In clustering spatial data, we are given a set of points in Rn and the objective is to find the clusters (representing spatial objects) in the set of points. Finding clusters with different shapes, sizes, and densities in data with noise and potentially outliers is a challenging task. This problem is especially studied in machine learning community and has lots of applications. We present a novel clustering technique, which can solve mentioned issues considerably. In the proposed algorithm, we let the structure of the data set itself find the clusters, this is done by having points actively send and receive feedbacks to each other.

The idea of the proposed method is to transform the input data set into a graph by adding edges between points that belong to the same cluster, so as connected components correspond to clusters, whereas points in different clusters are almost disconnected. At the start, our algorithm creates a preliminary graph and tries to improve it iteratively. In order to build the graph (add more edges), each point sends feedback to its neighborhood points. The neighborhoods and the feedback to be sent are determined by investigating the received feedbacks. This process continues until a stable graph is created. Henceforth, the clusters are formed by post-processing the constructed graph. Our algorithm is intuitive, easy to state and analyze, and does not need to have lots of parameter tuning. Experimental results show that our proposed algorithm outperforms existing related methods in this area.

References

  1. ACSD Data Sets.ce.sharif.edu/~fkhani/research/ACSD. {Online; accessed Sep-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chameleon Data Sets. http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/cluto/cluto/download. {Online; accessed Sep-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Ankerst, M. Breunig, H. Kriegel, and J. Sander. Optics: ordering points to identify the clustering structure. ACM SIGMOD Record, 28(2):49--60, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Birant and A. Kut. St-dbscan: An algorithm for clustering spatial--temporal data. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 60(1):208--221, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Borah and D. Bhattacharyya. An improved sampling-based dbscan for large spatial databases. In Intelligent Sensing and Information Processing, pages 92--96. IEEE, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. B. Borah and D. Bhattacharyya. A clustering technique using density difference. In Signal Processing, Communications and Networking, pages 585--588. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. B. Borah and D. Bhattacharyya. Ddsc: A density differentiated spatial clustering technique. Journal of Computers, 3(2):72--79, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Connor and P. Kumar. Fast construction of k-nearest neighbor graphs for point clouds. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 16(4):599--608, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Dickerson and D. Eppstein. Algorithms for proximity problems in higher dimensions. Computational Geometry, 5(5):277--291, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. Ertöz, M. Steinbach, and V. Kumar. Finding clusters of different sizes, shapes, and densities in noisy, high dimensional data. In SIAM international conference on data mining, volume 47, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. Ester, H. Kriegel, J. Sander, and X. Xu. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data mining, volume 1996, pages 226--231. AAAI Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. N. Grira, M. Crucianu, and N. Boujemaa. Unsupervised and semi-supervised clustering: a brief survey. A Review of Machine Learning Techniques for Processing Multimedia Content, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Jigui, L. Jie, and Z. Lianyu. Clustering algorithms research. Journal of Software, 19(1):48--61, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. P. Jones, A. Osipov, and V. Rokhlin. A randomized approximate nearest neighbors algorithm. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. G. Karypis, E. Han, and V. Kumar. Chameleon: Hierarchical clustering using dynamic modeling. Computer, 32(8):68--75, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Sander, M. Ester, H. Kriegel, and X. Xu. Density-based clustering in spatial databases: The algorithm gdbscan and its applications. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2(2):169--194, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An algorithm for discovering clusters of different densities or shapes in noisy data sets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '13: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
      March 2013
      2124 pages
      ISBN:9781450316569
      DOI:10.1145/2480362

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 March 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SAC '13 Paper Acceptance Rate255of1,063submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader