ABSTRACT
In this paper we explore how the decision of partaking in low-cost, low-risk online activism - slacktivism - \'14may affect subsequent civic action. Based on moral balancing and consistency effects, we designed an online experiment to test if signing or not signing an online petition increased or decreased subsequent contribution to a charity. We found that participants who signed the online petition were significantly more likely to donate money to a related charity, demonstrating a consistency effect. We also found that participants who did not sign the petition donated significantly more money to an unrelated charity, demonstrating a moral balancing effect. The results suggest that exposure to an online activism influences individual decision on subsequent civic actions.
- Dolin, D. J., Booth-Butterfield, S. Foot-in-the-door and cancer prevention. Health Communication 7, 1 (1995), 55--66.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Effron, D. and Monin, B. Letting people off the hook: When do good deeds excuse transgressions? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (2010), 1618--1634.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson, 1957.Google Scholar
- Gladwell, M. Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker, 4 October 2010.Google Scholar
- Guéguen, N. Foot-in-the-door technique and computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior 18, 1 (2002), 11--15Google ScholarCross Ref
- Khan, U. and Dhar, R. Where there is a way, there is a will? The effect of future choices on self-control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136 (2007), 277--288.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Land, M. B. Networked activism. Harvard Human Rights Journal. NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper 22, 09/10 (2009), #13.Google Scholar
- Mazar, N. and Zhong, C. B. Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science 21 (2010), 494-- 498.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Merritt, A. M., Effron, D. A. and Monin, B. Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4 (2010), 344357.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miller, D. T. and Effron, D. A. Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. In Zanna, M. P. and Olson, J. M. (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 43, San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier (2010), 117--158.Google Scholar
- Monin, B. and Miller, D. T. Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001), 33--43.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morozov, E. The brave new world of slacktivism. Net Effect - Foreign Policy. Slate Group, 19 May 2009. Web. 5 Apr. 2010.Google Scholar
- Nisan, M. (1991). The moral balance model: Theory and research extending our understanding of moral choice and deviation. In Kurtines, W. M. and Gewirtz, J. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (1991), 213--249.Google Scholar
- Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide and Georgetown University's Center for Social Impact Communication. Dynamics of Cause Engagement. At http://csic.georgetown.edu/research/215767.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press (1965).Google Scholar
- Pepitone, J. Text donations raise $7m for Red Cross Haiti effort. CNNMoney, January 16, 2010.Google Scholar
- Rotman, D., Vieweg, S., Yardi, S., Chi, E., Preece, J., Shneiderman, B., Pirolli, P. and Glaisyer, T. From slacktivism to activism: participatory culture in the age of social media. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R. and Medin, D. L. Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral selfregulation. Psychological Science 20, 4(2009), 523--528.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shulman, S. W. The case against mass e-mails: Perverse incentives and low quality public participation in U.S. federal rulemaking. Policy & Internet 1, 1 (2009), article 2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schwarzwald, J., Bizman, A. and Raz, M. The foot-in-the-door paradigm: Effects of second request size on donation probability and donor generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9, 3 (1983), 443--450.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vieweg, S., Hughes, A., Starbird, K. and Palen, L. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: What Twitter may contribute to situational awareness. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Does slacktivism hurt activism?: the effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism
Recommendations
Health Slacktivism on Social Media: Predictors and Effects
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media - Volume 8531The present study examined predictors, moderators, and effects of health slacktivism, which is characterized as individuals' effortless acts in supporting health causes primarily through Internet and social media. Findings revealed that issue-...
Political Participation in the Form of Online Petitions: A Comparison of Formal and Informal Petitioning
This paper contributes to the field of e-participation by studying e-petitioning on both formal and informal petition bodies. The aim is to contribute to the understanding of the features of formal and informal e-petition platforms as well as the ...
Perverting Activism: Cyberactivism and Its Potential Failures In Enhancing Democratic Institutions
This paper analyzes the impact of new technologies on a range of practices related to activism. The first section shows how the functioning of democratic institutions can be impaired by scarce political accountability connected with the emergence of ...
Comments