skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2470727acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Crowdfunding inside the enterprise: employee-initiatives for innovation and collaboration

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe a first experiment in enterprise crowdfunding - i.e., employees allocating money for employee-initiated proposals at an Intranet site, including a trial of this system with 511 employees in IBM Research. Major outcomes include: employee proposals that addressed diverse individual and organizational needs; high participation rates; extensive inter-departmental collaboration, including the discovery of large numbers of previously unknown collaborators; and the development of goals and motivations based on collective concerns at multiple levels of project groups, communities of practice, and the organization as a whole. We recommend further, comparative research into crowd-funding and other forms of employee-initiated innovations.

References

  1. Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2010). The geography of crowdsourcing. NET Institute Working Paper No. 10-80, 20 October 2010 (revised 9 January 2011). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1692661Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baez, M., & Convertino, G. (2012). Designing a facilitator's cockpit for an idea management system. CHI 2012 Ext. Abstr.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bailey, B. P., & Horvitz, E. (2010). What's your idea? A case study of a grassroots innovation pipeline within a large software company. Proc. CHI 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T. & Schwienbacher, A. (2011), "Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd" retrieved from http://www2.dse.unibo.it/dsa/seminari/610/Crowdfunding_BLS_13Feb2011.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehn, P. & Kyng, M. (1987). The collective resource approach to systems design. In G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng (Eds.), Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge. Brookfield VT USA: Gower.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gerber, E. M., Hui, J. S., & Kuo, P.-Y. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to participate. Position paper at CSCW 2012 DIST workshop, http://distworkshop.wordpress.com/resources/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghosh, A., & Mahdian, M. (2008). Charity auctions on social networks. Proc. ACM-SODA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Goecks, J., Voida, A., Voida, S., Mynatt, E. D. (2008). Charitable technologies: Opportunities for collaborative computing in nonprofit fundraising. Proc. CSCW 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Harms, M. (2007). What drives motivation to participate financially in a crowdfunding community? Master's thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Helander, M., Lawrence, R., & Li, Y. (2007). Looking for great ideas: Analyzing the innovation jam, Proc. KDD 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Holtzblatt, L. & Tierney, M. (2011). Measuring the effectiveness of social media on an innovation process. Proc. CHI 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hui, J., Gerber, E., & Greenberg, M. (2012). Easy money? The demands of crowdfunding work. Northwestern University Segal Design Inst. Tech. Rep. 12-04.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Indiegogo (n.d.). http://www.indiegogo.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kickstarter (n.d.). http://www.kickstarter.com/help/statsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kraut, R., & Resnick, P. (2012). Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kuo, P.-Y., & Gerber, L. (2012). Design principles: Crowdfunding as a creativity support tool. CHI 2012 Ext. Abstr. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kuznetsov, S., & Paulos, E. (2010). Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. Proc. NordiCHI 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Leigh, K. E., Huber, A. M., & Tremblay, K. R., Jr. (2012). Fostering individual and organizational creativity in design. Soc. & Info. Tech. http://www.iiis.org/CDs2012/CD2012IMC/IREPS_2012/PapersPdf/IR715DF.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. McDermott, R. (1999). Learning across teams: How to build communities of practice in team organizations. Know. Mgmt. J. 8, 32--36 (May/June).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Millen, D. R., & Fontaine, M. A. (2003). Multi-team facilitation of very large-scale distributed meetings. Proc. ECSCW 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Muller, M., & Carey, K. (2002). Design as a minority discipline in a software company: Toward requirements for a community of practice. Proc. CHI 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Muller, M. J., & Druin, A. (2012). Participatory design: The third space of HCI. In Jacko, J., Human Computer Interaction Handbook. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Muller, M., Ehrlich, K., Matthews, T., Perer, A., Ronen, I., & Guy, I. (2012). Diversity among enterprise communities: Collaborating, teaming, and innovating through social media. Proc. CHI 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Netburn, D. (2012). Online donations to bullied bus driver top $540,000. Los Angeles Times, 22 June 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Nielsen, J., (2006). 'Participation inequality: Encouraging more users to contribute,' http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Noble, J. (2012). Minority voices in crowdsourcing: Why we should pay attention to every member of the crowd. Proc. CSCW 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Nonnecke, B., Andrews, A., & Preece, J., 'Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes, and behavior.' Elec. Com. Res. 6(1), 7--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowdfunding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. J. Serv. Mgnt. 22(4), 443--470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Reed, J. (2012). Fans kick in a million to let Palmer make music her way. Boston Globe 26 June, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Schneider, D., Mornes, K., Moreira de Souza, J., & Esteves, G. P. (2012). CSCWD: Five characters in search of crowds. Proc. IEEE CSCWD 2012. Schuler, D., & Namiaki.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J. M., Ellison, N. B. & Lampe, C. (2009). Bowling online: Social networking and social capital within the organization. Proc. C&T 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Tam, F.-W. (2012). Pebble technology becomes Kickstarter's test case. Wall Street Journal 2 July 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Terveen, L., Riedl, J., Konstan, J., & Lampe, C. (in press). The build to learn genre of social computing research. To appear in Olson, J., & Kellogg, W. (eds.), Ways of knowing in HCI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. van Wingerden, R., & Ryan, J. (2011). Fighting for funds: An exploratory study into the field of crowdfunding. Lund University School of Economics and Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Wash, R., & Lampe, C. (2012). The power of the ask in social media. Proc. CSCW 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Westerski, A., Iglesias, C. A., & Nagle, T. (2011). The road from community ideas to organisational innovation: A life cycle survey of idea management systems. Int. J. Web Based Communities 7(4), 493--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Crowdfunding inside the enterprise: employee-initiatives for innovation and collaboration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader