skip to main content
10.1145/2467696.2467737acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling heterogeneous data resources for social-ecological research: a data-centric perspective

Published:22 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital repositories are grappling with an influx of scientific data brought about by the well publicized "data deluge" in science, business, and society. One particularly perplexing problem is the long-term archival and reuse of complex data sets. This paper presents an integrated approach to data discovery over heterogeneous data resources in social-ecological systems research. Social-ecological systems data is complex because the research draws from both social and natural sciences. Using a sample set of data resources from the domain, we explore an approach to discovery and representation of this data. Specifically, we develop an ontology-based process of organization and visualization from a data-centric perspective. We define data resources broadly and identify six key categories of resources that include data collected from site visits to shared ecological resources, the structure of research instruments, domain concepts, research designs, publications, theories and models. We identify the underlying relationships and construct an ontology that captures these relationships using semantic web languages. The ontology and a NoSQL data store at the back end store the data resource instances. These are integrated into a portal architecture we refer to as the Integrated Visualization of Social-Ecological Resources (IViSER) that allows users to both browse the relationships captured in the ontology and easily visualize the granular details of data resources.

References

  1. Alexander, K., and Hausenblas, M. 2009. Describing linked datasets-on the design and usage of void, the vocabulary of interlinked datasets. In Proceedings of LDOW2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechhofer, S., De Roure, D., Gamble, M., Goble, C., and Buchan, I. 2010. Research Objects: Towards Exchange and Reuse of Digital Knowledge. In 1st Int'l Workshop on The Future of The Web for Collaborative Science (Raleigh, North Carolina).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosch, T., Cyganiak, R., Wackerow, J., and Zapilko, B. 2012. Leveraging the DDI model for linked statistical data in the social, behavioral, and economic sciences. In Proceedings of the Int'l Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chhatre, A., and Agrawal, A. 2009. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. P NATL ACAD SCI USA, 106, 42, 17667--17670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Fegraus, E. H., Andelman, S., Jones, M. B., and Schildhauer, M. 2005. Maximizing the value of ecological data with structured metadata: an introduction to ecological metadata language (EML) and principles for metadata creation. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 86,3, 158--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gerber, A., and Hunter, J. 2008. LORE: A Compound Object Authoring and Publishing Tool for the Australian Literature Studies Community. In Proceedings of 11th Int'l Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries (ICADL) 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Google Web Toolkit. Last accessed May19, 2013 at https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. IFRI (International Forestry Resources and Institutions). Last accessed May 19, 2013 at http://www.ifriresearch.net/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jensen, S., Plale, B., Liu, X., Chen, M., Leake, D., and England, J. 2012. Generalized representation and mapping for social-ecological data: Freeing data from the database. In Proceedings of IEEE eScience Conference 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. MongoDB. Last accessed May 19, 2013 at http://www.mongodb.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ostrom, E. 2007. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. P NATL ACAD SCI USA, 104, 9, 15181--15187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ostrom, E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325, 5939, 419--422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Pepe, A., Mayernik, M., Borgman, C., and Van de Sompel, H. 2010. From Artifacts to Aggregations: Modeling Scientific Life Cycles on the Semantic Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 567--582. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Social-Ecological Systems Semantic Wiki. Last accessed May 19, 2013 at http://socialecologicalsystems.referata.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. TechAmerica Foundation's Big Data Commission. 2012. Demystifying big data: A practical guide to transforming the business of government.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Vardigan, M., Heus, P., and Thomas, W. 2008. Data Documentation Initiative: Toward a Standard for the Social Sciences. Int'l Journal of Digital Curation, 3,1, 107--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Van de Sompel, H., Lagoze, C., Nelson, M. L., Warner, S., Sanderson, R., & Johnston, P. 2009. Adding eScience assets to the data web. In Proceedings of LDOW 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. WebProtege. Last accessed May 19, 2013 at http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/WebProtegeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Modeling heterogeneous data resources for social-ecological research: a data-centric perspective

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            JCDL '13: Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
            July 2013
            480 pages
            ISBN:9781450320771
            DOI:10.1145/2467696

            Copyright © 2013 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 22 July 2013

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            JCDL '13 Paper Acceptance Rate28of95submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader