skip to main content
10.1145/2465529.2465533acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmetricsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

A tale of two metrics: simultaneous bounds on competitiveness and regret

Published:17 June 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

No abstract available.

References

  1. A. Blum and C. Burch, "On-line learning and the metrical task system problem," Machine Learning, vol. 39, pp. 35--58, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Buchbinder, S. Chen, J. Naor, and O. Shamir, "Unified algorithms for online learning and competitive analysis," in Proc. Conf. on Learning Techniques (COLT), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Blum, S. Chawla, and A. Kalai, "Static optimality and dynamic search-optimality in lists and trees," in Proceedings of SODA, 2002, pp. 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Blum, C. Burch, and A. Kalai, "Finely-competitive paging," in Proceedings of FOCS, 1999, pp. 450--457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Abernethy, P. Bartlett, N. Buchbinder, and I. Stanton, "A regularization approach to metrical task systems," in Proceedings of ALT, 2010, pp. 270--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. E. Hazan and C. Seshadhri, "Efficient learning algorithms for changing environments," in Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning. ACM, 2009, pp. 393--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Blum and Y. Mansour, "From external to internal regret," Learning Theory, pp. 1--10, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Blum, H. Karloff, Y. Rabani, and M. Saks, "A decomposition theorem and bounds for randomized server problems," in Proc. IEEE Symp. Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Zinkevich, "Online convex programming and generalized infinitesimal gradient ascent," in Proc. Int. Conf. Machine Learning (ICML), T. Fawcett and N. Mishra, Eds. AAAI Press, 2003, pp. 928--936.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. E. Hazan, A. Agarwal, and S. Kale, "Logarithmic regret algorithms for online convex optimization," Mach. Learn., vol. 69, pp. 169--192, Dec. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Lin, A. Wierman, L. L. H. Andrew, and E. Thereska, "Dynamic right-sizing for power-proportional data centers," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A tale of two metrics: simultaneous bounds on competitiveness and regret

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMETRICS '13: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS/international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
      June 2013
      406 pages
      ISBN:9781450319003
      DOI:10.1145/2465529
      • cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
        ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 41, Issue 1
        Performance evaluation review
        June 2013
        385 pages
        ISSN:0163-5999
        DOI:10.1145/2494232
        Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 June 2013

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGMETRICS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate54of196submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate459of2,691submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader