skip to main content
10.1145/2461121.2461137acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Firefixia: an accessibility web browser customization toolbar for people with dyslexia

Published:13 May 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

People with dyslexia often face difficulties on consuming written content at the Web. This occurs mainly because websites' designs do not consider the barriers faced by them, since dyslexia is not taken into account as often as other functional limitations. Guidelines for designing accessible Web pages are being consolidated and studied. Meanwhile, people with dyslexia face barriers and develop workarounds to overcome these difficulties. This work presents a customization toolbar called Firefixia, especially designed to support people with dyslexia to adapt the presentation of Web content according to their preferences. Firefixia was tested by 4 participants with diagnosed dyslexia. The participants evaluated and provided us feedback regarding the toolbar most/least useful features. From the presented results, one expects to highlight the need for end-user customization features that are easy to access, easy to use, and easy to explore. Participants reported that the most useful customization features are the text size, the text alignment, and the link color. Finally, this work indicates promising directions for end-user customization tools such as Firefixia.

References

  1. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). 2005. Introduction to Web Accessibility. http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organization - Disability and health. 2012. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs352/en/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. International Dyslexia Association (IDA). 2008. Dyslexia Basics. http://www.interdys.org/ewebeditpro5/upload/BasicsFactSheet.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Baeza-Yates, R. and Rello, L. 2011. Estimating dyslexia in the web. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1969289.1969300 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Santana, V. F. de, Oliveira, R. de, Almeida, L. D. A., and Baranauskas, M. C. C. 2012. Web accessibility and people with dyslexia: a survey on techniques and guidelines. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2207016.2207047 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). 2008. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. American Psychiatric Association (APA). 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rello, L., Kanvinde, G., and Baeza-Yates, R. 2012. Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to improve accessibility for dyslexics. In Proc. of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 36, 9 pages. DOI=10.1145/2207016.2207048 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2207016.2207048 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Nielsen, J. 2009. Customization of UIs and Products. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/customization-of-uis-and-products/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mørch, A. 1997. Three levels of end-user tailoring: customization, integration, and extension. In Computers and design in context, Morten Kyng and Lars Mathiassen (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA 51--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dickinson, A., Gregor P., Newell, A. F. 2002. Ongoing investigation of the ways in which some of the problems encountered by some dyslexics can be alleviated using computer techniques. In Proc. of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies (Assets '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 97--103. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/638249.638268 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rubin, J. 1994. Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. Theresa Hudson (Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nielsen, J. 2012. Thinking Aloud: The #1 Usability Tool. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/thinking-aloud-the-1-usability-tool/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Firefixia: an accessibility web browser customization toolbar for people with dyslexia

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          W4A '13: Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility
          May 2013
          209 pages
          ISBN:9781450318440
          DOI:10.1145/2461121

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 May 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          W4A '13 Paper Acceptance Rate7of20submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate171of371submissions,46%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader