Simplify or help?: text simplification strategies for people with dyslexia

ABSTRACT

We present a user study for two different automatic strategies that simplify text content for people with dyslexia. The strategies considered are the standard one (replacing a complex word with the most simpler synonym) and a new one that presents several synonyms for a complex word if the user requests them. We compare texts transformed by both strategies with the original text and to a gold standard manually built. The study was undertook by 96 participants, 47 with dyslexia plus a control group of 49 people without dyslexia. To show device independence, for the new strategy we used three different reading devices. Overall, participants with dyslexia found texts presented with the new strategy significantly more readable and comprehensible. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest user study of its kind.

References

1. A. Al-Wabil, P. Zaphiris, and S. Wilson. Web navigation for individuals with dyslexia: an exploratory study. Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity, pages 593--602, 2007.
2. S. M. Aluísio and C. Gasperin. Fostering digital inclusion and accessibility: the PorSimples project for simplification of Portuguese texts. In Proc. NAACL HLT '10 Workshop YIWCALA '10, pages 46--53, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2010. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. S. Bautista, C. Leon, R. Hervás, and P. Gervás. Empirical identification of text simplification strategies for reading-impaired people. In European Conference for the Advancement of Assistive Technology, Maastricht, the Netherlands, 2011.
4. S. Bott, L. Rello, B. Drndarevic, and H. Saggion. Can Spanish be simpler? LexSiS: Lexical simplification for Spanish. In Proc. Coling '12, Mumbay, India, December 2012.
5. British Dyslexia Association. Dyslexia style guide, January 2012. http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/.
6. J. Carroll, G. Minnen, D. Pearce, Y. Canning, S. Devlin, and J. Tait. Simplifying text for language-impaired readers. In Proc. EACL '09, pages 269--270, 1999.
7. ClaroSoftware. Clarosoftware, 2012 2012. http://www.clarosoftware.com/index.php?cPath=348.
8. Col·legi de Logopedes de Catalunya. PRODISCAT Protocol de detecció i actuació en la dislexia. Àmbit Educativo. Departament d'Ensenyament de la Generalitat de Catalunya, 2011.
9. J. Craven and H. Booth. Putting awareness into practice: practical steps for conducting usability tests. Library review, 55(3):179--194, 2006.
10. F. Cuetos and F. Valle. Modelos de lectura y dislexias (Reading models and dyslexias). Infancia y Aprendizaje (Infancy and Learning), 44:3--19, 1988.
11. V. de Santana, R. de Oliveira, L. Almeida, and M. Baranauskas. Web accessibility and people with dyslexia: a survey on techniques and guidelines. In Proc. W4A '12, page 35. ACM, 2012.
12. S. Devlin and G. Unthank. Helping aphasic people process online information. In Proc. ASSETS '06, pages 225--226. ACM, 2006.
13. M. Dixon. Comparative study of disabled vs. non-disabled evaluators in user-testing: dyslexia and first year students learning computer programming. Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity, pages 647--656, 2007.
14. B. Drndarevic and H. Saggion. Towards automatic lexical simplification in Spanish: an empirical study. In Proc. NAACL HLT '12 Workshop PITR '12, 2012.
15. G. Eden, J. Stein, H. Wood, and F. Wood. Differences in eye movements and reading problems in dyslexic and normal children. Vision Research, 34(10):1345--1358, 1994.
16. L. Evett and D. Brown. Text formats and web design for visually impaired and dyslexic readers-clear text for all. Interacting with Computers, 17:453--472, 2005.
17. P. Gregor, A. Dickinson, A. Macaffer, and P. Andreasen. Seeword: a personal word processing environment for dyslexic computer users. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3):341--355, 2003.
18. M. Huenerfauth, L. Feng, and N. Elhadad. Comparing evaluation techniques for text readability software for adults with intellectual disabilities. In Proc. ASSETS '09, pages 3--10. ACM, 2009.
19. J. Hyönä and R. Olson. Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: Effects of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6):1430, 1995.
20. Interagency Commission on Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Report to the U.S. Congress. Government Printing Office, Washington DC, U.S., 1987.
21. International Dyslexia Association. Definition of dyslexia: http://interdys.org/DyslexiaDefinition.htm, 2011. Based in the initial definition of the Research Committee of the Orton Dyslexia Society, former name of the IDA, done in 1994.
22. G. Kanvinde, L. Rello, and R. Baeza-Yates. IDEAL: a dyslexic-friendly e-book reader (poster). In The 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference of Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS 2012), Boulder, USA, October 2012. ACM Press.
23. S. Kurniawan and G. Conroy. Comparing comprehension speed and accuracy of online information in students with and without dyslexia. Advances in Universal Web Design and Evaluation: Research, Trends and Opportunities, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, pages 257--70, 2006.
24. J. E. McCarthy and S. J. Swierenga. What we know about dyslexia and web accessibility: a research review. Universal Access in the Information Society, 9:147--152, June 2010.
25. R. Mitkov, L. A. Ha, A. Varga, and L. Rello. Semantic similarity of distractors in multiple-choice tests: extrinsic evaluation. In Proc. EACL Workshop GeMS '09, pages 49--56. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009.
26. A. Newell and L. Booth. The use of lexical and spelling aids with dyslexics. Computers and Literacy, pages 35--44, 1991.
27. K. Rayner and S. Duffy. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3):191--201, 1986.
28. L. Rello and R. Baeza-Yates. Lexical quality as a proxy for web text understandability (poster). In Proc. WWW '12, Lyon, France, 2012.
29. L. Rello and R. Baeza-Yates. The presence of English and Spanish dyslexia in the Web. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 8:131--158, 2012.
30. L. Rello, R. Baeza-Yates, L. Dempere, and H. Saggion. Frequent words improve readability and short words improve understandability for people with dyslexia. In Proc. INTERACT '13, Cape Town, South Africa, 2013.
31. L. Rello, R. Baeza-Yates, H. Saggion, S. Bott, R. Carlini, C. Bayarri, A. Gòrriz, S. Gupta, G. Kanvinde, and V. Topac. Dyswebxia 2.0! accessible text for people with dyslexia (demo). In Proc. W4A '13, The Paciello Group Web Accessibility Challenge, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013.
32. L. Rello, S. Bautista, R. Baeza-Yates, P. Gervás, R. Hervás, and H. Saggion. One half or 50%? An eye-tracking study of number representation readability. In Proc. INTERACT '13, Cape Town, South Africa, 2013.
33. L. Rello, G. Kanvinde, and R. Baeza-Yates. Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to improve accessibility for dyslexics. In Proc. W4A '12, Lyon, France, 2012. ACM Press.
34. J. Rüsseler, S. Probst, S. Johannes, and T. Münte. Recognition memory for high-and low-frequency words in adult normal and dyslexic readers: an event-related brain potential study. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 25(6):815--829, 2003.
35. H. Saggion, E. Gómez-Martínez, E. Etayo, A. Anula, and L. Bourg. Text Simplification in Simplext: Making Text More Accessible. Revista de la Sociedad Española para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 47, 2011.
36. F. Simmons and C. Singleton. The reading comprehension abilities of dyslexic students in higher education. Dyslexia, 6(3):178--192, 2000.
37. S. Swierenga, J. E. Porter, S. Ghosh, and J. E. McCarthy. Dyslexia and website design: The importance of user-based testing. In Fourth International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry., Urbana- Champaign, IL, May 2008.
38. S. Williams, E. Reiter, and L. Osman. Experiments with discourse-level choices and readability. In Proc. ENLG '03), Budapest, Hungary, 2003.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

• Information systems

  • Information retrieval

  • Information storage systems